Home

Boring_Meat2550 Archive

View 0 posts and 119 comments by Boring_Meat2550 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

A man who "acts feminist" in front of women without believing in its principles is certainly suspect, yes. Feminism is a political ideology. To real feminist men, it's a deeply rooted belief system that they try and apply it to all aspects of their lives, not just dating/sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:22 PM
–

I mean you're entitled to your opinion but you're wrong lol. I don't need to do anything to "land women". I've already "landed" one for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:04 PM
1

Just like men, there are plenty of young women who are immature and don't know what they want. They may date/sleep with a few men before figuring it out. There's no shame in that. There's something slightly romantic about two young and immature partners figuring life out together. If you want to "wait at the finish line" that's your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:37 PM
–

This looks like bait so I'm not going to bite. Just be specific when you speak about "men". Most men aren't redpill men. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:33 PM
1

This isn't wrong. I see this myself. It also doesn't change the fact that there are many women who continue to expect their male partner to provide and protect. I also see men increasingly taking on childraising responsibilities, some even relinquishing their role as provider in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:27 PM
–

I mean this just isn't true. Dunno what else to say. If you or other men you know think like this, y'all need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:22 PM
–

I've already explained why I didn't do that. It would have been a waste of my time and energy since OP would not have understood it. The terms I used to describe the post were not directed at OP but to the post itself. Hence not ad hominem, either "weak" or strong. Do look up these terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:24 AM
9

This phenomenon is reportedly more common amongst women actually. One hears "I can fix him" more than "I can fix her". How OP decided the latter is the original phenomenon I really have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:31 AM
–

The terms I used described OP's argument, they weren't "ad hominem". Look up what that means. Also look up "logical fallacy". You seem to like using heavy-sounding words to sound smart except you don't seem to know what they actually mean or what contexts to use them in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:23 AM
2

I'm glad you don't, and there are obviously other women who don't too, but there are also women who do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:20 AM
3

Not always. For some people it just never works out. Being conventionally unattractive can multiply the probability of that happening. I do agree that being open to women who are also conventionally unattractive increases your chances of finding a partner considerably. I just don't agree that a man who's single necessarily has a "defeatist mindset". Maybe things just didn't click for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:53 PM
-2

Ok, you may be right but I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "standards issue". Looks like they mean the men have standards that are too high but I can't be sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:48 PM
1

I used terms that described OP's post accurately without elaborating on actual gender theory because that wouldn't have been productive given where they're coming from. It was the most rational course of action from my perspective. Not every man's masculinity is as fragile as yours where being called "weak" "effeminate" "lame" etc. threaten it. If you were trying to get under my skin, you'll have to try a lot harder. If you think you're being rational, you might want to look up the dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:45 PM
2

Read the comment again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:38 PM
0

>So, when people say that there really are no truly involuntarily single men, it’s confusing and invalidating But this user never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:37 PM
7

>It is true that I see them as losers but not necessarily because they aren’t good men, but because they’re stuck in a defeatist mindset. A conventionally unattractive man who's single because many women find him physically unattractive doesn't have a "defeatist mindset", many women just find him physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:34 PM
5

I'm an ugly short quiet guy. I'm not single. I don't think most women in my workplace look at me and think I'm single. I don't think most women in my workplace think about my love life at all. The only people having such thoughts are men who haven't been outside in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:30 PM
7

No, someone can be autistic/have other mental disorders which leads to lack of social skills. Nothing to do with "character" in such cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:27 PM
3

If you consider being conventionally unattractive as something wrong with them, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:25 PM
2

A lot of it has to do with shaming single women into feeling like she needs to be with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:23 PM
8

I'm not sure if by "loser" OP means a man who's morally bad or someone who's inept and worthy of demeaning. There are quite a few women who think a man who's single is a "loser" in the latter sense, I don't know if there are many who think it's a moral failing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:17 PM
1

You don't have to do all these things. A lot of "average" men will simply find "average" women. Behaving as if you'll be single as a man unless you do all of this is rather wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:06 PM
2

No, modern gender theory is scientific, facts-based and logical. Whatever this guy has written is all of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:54 PM
1

That's a vague statement that doesn't even begin to answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:29 PM
1

Indeed. The men (and some women) on this sub are astonishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:11 AM
2

What (who) is WPATH? There's no "according to" when it comes to something being unscientific. There's no scope for personal opinion here. Whatever you've written is factually incorrect and has no relation to reality or history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:06 AM
1

How do you know which is more common?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:04 AM
2

I can't speak to what "most men" are like and neither can you. I can only speak about the men I keep company with and most of them aren't horny/desperate enough to sleep with almost any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:03 AM
1

I never said anything remotely as outlandish as a "guy using a woman for girlfriend energy". I said some women develop feelings for their male friends that go unreciprocated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:01 AM
0

That's what I'm saying, the logic doesn't follow for you because it seems you're willing to sleep with almost any type of woman. It follows for a lot of men (including me) who wouldn't. I'd rather stay sexless than sleep with certain types of women, and I believe many men would.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:28 AM
1

Which "stuff" are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:21 AM
2

This is weird. Some women may like "bad boy traits", most don't. This myth that most women want bad boy traits in men is probably because some of the attributes that "bad boys" have are generally desirable like confidence, ambition etc. But y'all assume that women want the whole package of disrespectful, disloyal etc. which most women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:36 AM
0

I mean, you do you, just don't claim to speak for men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:33 AM
2

What is your point here? That all women are having sex with the same "chad" men while the bottom 80% or whatever men are all sexless?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:29 AM
2

It isn't remotely "reasonable" to feel entitled to women's affection and sex and be angry and resentful towards them for not getting it. No one is owed these things by another person. This is the sort of thinking that breeds incel behaviour, which in some cases leads to violence against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:28 AM
2

I agree with what you're saying and you don't deserve being spoken to that way. No one does. However, it isn't innate "male nature" that's the problem, it's the fact that a lot of men have been socialised to behave in this way. Your flair indicates you believe in gender essentialism, which is dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:26 AM
2

Uninformed, unscientific, irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:16 AM
1

This is the most twisted reason for not befriending women that I've ever come across. My female friends are amazing people and life wouldn't be the same without them. I know I'll never develop romantic feelings for them, nor will I not befriend a woman because of the possibility that I'll catch feelings for her down the line. If that happens I'll deal with it. It's quite possible the woman carches feelings for you and you don't reciprocate. You don't seem to have even considered the possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:14 AM
2

Saying "women right" and blindly supporting women isn't feminist. There many awful women out there, not only is it not misogynist to call those women out if you're a sensible man, it's simply the right thing to do. Supporting awful women isn't supporting women's issues. Of course there are misogynist men who pretend to be feminists in hopes of getting laid, but I'm pretty sure they tell on themselves soon enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 06:14 PM
1

Oh I do know my fallacies pretty well kiddo. Nah kid, you really don't. I used a analogy that fits nicely into explaining how what you're saying is wrong You did the exact opposite of this actually. Do I need to pull up what you said? Please do, it'll make you look even worse. Since you know these "clowns" you should be able to explain what they say is wrong and the reasons behind people laughing at them due to their position. Look kid, I already told you this ain't how it works in the real worl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:31 PM
1

You truly dont know what that fallacy even is. Nah kid, the truly not knowing of fallacies is your department. trying to move the goal post Sorry kid, I know you want to show off the new phrase you just learnt, but this isn't where you use it. You just keep burying yourself deeper and deeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:15 PM
1

Thats like me saying men will fall over from a kick in the balls and you would ask how would you know? How do you know most men experienced the same reaction when getting kicked in the balls. Add false equivalences to the list of fallacies you've been making. Fox News know these guys or podcasters know them too. Lmao you're just proving my point kid. Do yourself and everyone else a huge favour and get off the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:39 AM
1

>they complain all the time about their abusive bfs, and when you ask them why dont you leave, they stay silent or give a bs excuse. Could be because their abusive bfs are more likely to kill them if they leave than if they stay. Also they may need to stay for their kids, be financially dependent on their partner etc. You haven't spent even a second trying to understand what life might be like for women in abusive relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:14 AM
11

That, and the fact that women are shamed for having casual sex and it's also far more risky for them than for men. These factors disincentivise women from having sex too soon with someone they don't know very well. I doubt many women even think of sex as a "bargaining chip" the way men on here believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:50 AM
1

It's also worth mentioning not every man even wants to be a "millionaire playboy". The millionaire part would be fine if I could get there without exploiting people. No desire to be a "playboy" whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:32 AM
1

>Who promised you guys that everybody can be a millionaire playboy? Obviously no one did and no sensible man believes this. Absurd statement. I've just mentioned why it's impossible to make even "marginal improvements" in some of the metrics men are judged on most (height, facial attractiveness). It is possible in other areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:12 PM
1

All you've been doing is talking in circles and tangents, indulging in deflection and changing goalposts multiple times. You haven't provided an iota of evidence to support your original assertions, which you've then tried to obfuscate through the above tactics. You clearly don't know the fundamental principles of debate or logical reasoning. Engaging with you is not a productive use of my time. I strongly suggest you learn the basics of debate/reasoning before trying to argue with strangers onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:08 PM
–

Speaking of terms of service, you don't sound old enough to participate in adult subreddits. Nothing "personnel" kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:13 AM
1

I did provide evidence I explained it thoroughly go and read my replies. Nothing you provided qualifies as "evidence". They're simply your personal opinions. Wait so your contradicting yourself. You agree that men have higher sex drives that cause them to go after women more but now saying that I don't understand how most men behave even though saying before that you agree that men have higher sex drive which leads to men going after women more often than the other way around. Non sequitur again…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:52 AM
2

Oh it does since I said right after that a proven fact that men have higher sex drives. Non sequitur. Simply having higher sex drives on average doesn't mean most men slot women into two categories - relationship material vs. onky casual sex material - which was your original assertion. did as a man I understand what a man is and behave You know how you behave, clearly not how most men behave. Show me a time in human history where the roles of men or the behavior of men were that of women I'll w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 09:23 PM
2

Because I have a penis and testicles and behave like a man That doesn't mean you can speak to how "most men" behave. Your arguments are fallacious and you present no actual evidence. You simply hold a questionable opinion, what you're stating isn't a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 09:06 PM
3

Your proof that "most men" think like this? How are you such an expert on what "most men" do?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:37 PM
–

Yes I see that, but what were your reasons for posting this? Do you find such behaviour "icky"? Because if that's the case then these are incredibly imaginative situations. Also, the first one is a terrible situation to be in and if you find that an "ick", you're just not a very nice person. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:36 PM
1

Where did this underlying assumption of "he must not find her attractive enough to have a relationship but attractive enough to sleep with" come from? I was simply talking about a scenario where two consenting adults have casual sex. I mentioned nothing about either party's reasons for wanting casual sex, which could be anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:32 PM
–

Yup, "regarded" is what I am lol. Also, you clearly can't read so maybe go back to school and learn that before trying to debate strangers online.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:29 PM
3

It's not "using" her if it's something she's doing consensually.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:06 PM
6

We men have 2 categories Speak for yourself, you don't represent men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:04 PM
1

What is "lesser" is subjective. Also, quite a few conventionally unattractive wealthy men try to date women who are attractive. Wouldn't an attractive woman they end up dating be with someone "lesser" than her in this scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:03 PM
2

In what world is this reality? The real one. Doesn't seem like the one you're living in though. The stats for apps are abysmal, it's 80 percent men and 20 percent women You have your answer - reality is more than just dating apps. Also, read my comment again. Carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:01 PM
2

That's not what "insecure" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 04:25 PM
0

I understand the fat/ugly women are going to have a hard time finding a husband or guy that genuinely cares about them It's the other way round - men who get into relationships with such women are more likely to care about them vs. men who date attractive women, who might be in it because they just want a trophy. But for men, to even get A SINGULAR date, it takes a lot of effort lol Wrong. It's usually no more difficult for a man than for a woman to get a date with someone they want to go out wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 04:22 PM
6

What you wear has nothing to do with it. "Bad cake" will still hunt you and make you sick and possibly kill you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:55 PM
–

Except for many women the "bad cake" vastly outnumbers the "good cake" and might make you horribly sick and even kill you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:01 PM
–

>the majority of them don't even find success from taking part in the Red Pill. It's a cult where the goal is to keep you within it, not to find success. If most red pilled men found success they wouldn't have much to complain about and the whole theory would fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:05 PM
–

I'd broadly agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:01 PM
–

That's not the meaning of the sentence you wrote. Learn to write clearly and coherently in English or use ChatGPT to translate from your native language.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:26 PM
1

I've bought drinks for women at clubs when there was zero potential for sex from either side. I just like buying people drinks when I'm out and seeing them smiling surprisedly. If you don't like that it's cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:00 PM
–

Oral rehydration salts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:58 PM
–

Not being attracted to women and being indifferent to being cheated on or broken up with are two wildly different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:57 PM
–

How can the bar be in hell for these men whom supposedly most women want, if most women supposedly want them? Do you realise how much you're contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:56 PM
–

They do seem so, sadly. A lot of them sound like they're perpetually online and have little life experience. Not sure which post this is though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:55 PM
–

These are your "icks"? I'm trying to see the point of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:53 PM
–

I still don't get where "moral failing" comes into the picture. I'd imagine more people would hold the first category *personally accountable*. But like I said, it isn't a black and white answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:51 PM
–

This hypothetical woman sounds like someone with both low self-esteem and was enabling cheating. Both dealbreakers to me. If it was a long time ago and it's something she regretted and is sure she'd never do again then maybe. If it was her most recent ex then probably a no go for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:46 PM
–

There's no question of morality here as it isn't immoral to be any of these things. While sensible people will hold the fat or slovenly or smelly person accountable as these things are mostly in one's control (lot of nuance when it comes to fat though), the world doesn't actually have a lot of sensible people. Lookism is a major phenomenon, a lot of people project negative traits on to unattractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:42 PM
–

>While older guys always be trying to advocate for age gap relationships Not always, not even close. Plenty of men date within their age group. >It’s other men making it harder for younger guys to date, not women. Quite a few women have a criterion that a man be of same age or older (within a few years) in order to date him. Both men and women are responsible for setting this standard today.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:39 PM
–

It's not a "privilege" to be pursued and hounded and harassed by creepy, potentially dangerous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:32 PM
4

Not red pill, and definitely don't believe AWALT logic. But generally speaking, when it comes to what makes men desirable, some of the things are extraordinarily difficult while others are downright impossible to achieve. If a man is born into a low-income family and let's say has learning disabilities too, it's extremely challenging for him to become wealthy. It's practically impossible to grow taller than a man's genes allow or change his facial structure to look more attractive in a masculine…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:31 PM
1

I don't think one can posit that it's easier now compared to some time period in the past without some data/evidence to back it up. One argument certainly can be that more and more people are resorting to online dating to find partners, where being conventionally attractive matters more than irl. Whether this makes it more difficult for men to find partners irl or not, I can't quite say.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:28 PM
–

Humans can't be explained through "primate behaviour". Most people aren't complete slaves to genetically coded instincts and behave like mindless automatons. There's huge variety in human behaviour that can't be explained through simple generalisations based on primate behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 09:33 AM
1

You're incredibly good at missing the point. Did you even bother reading my last comment? Looks like you only read the first sentence of my first comment , convinced yourself it means something completely different than what it actually does, and went off on a tangent that has nothing to do with the topic. Clown behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:25 PM
1

I... was talking very specifically about dating and traditional gender roles here. My only point was all men don't yearn to be the sole provider or want all the highly-gendered traits in women this guy has listed. That's all. I absolutely didn't try to tell women how they should be viewing men from a safety pov.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:16 AM
1

>Most men You mean most redpill men. Don't drag regular men into this. We neither love being the sole provider nor want all the qualities you've listed in a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:28 AM
–

"penis-shaming" can take different forms. I've rarely seen women throw penis-related insults directly at men. Or talk about how small someone's dick is when he isn't present. However comments like "small dick energy" and "limp dick" are used a fair bit by women. It's not directly shaming an individual man's penis, but it's still proagating the notion that smaller penises or ED are things to be ashamed of and worthy of being demeaned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:26 AM
2

Using absurd roundabout arguments to desperately prove your opinion is a fact, and resorting to feeble adolescent pejoratives when your fallacies are pointed out, indicate you don't have the intellectual capacity and maturity necessary to hold a discussion on this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:59 PM
–

>I deliberately left out things like "good", "kind", "dedicated" or "respectful", as those do not cause attractiveness. Confidence, charisma and competence are generally positive qualities. The fact that you didn't include other positive qualities doesn't make these not positive qualities. >I didn't say "desirable qualities". I said attraction. Ok. Gay men would be **attracted** to other men with these qualities. Better? >Please, kindly tell me what's the most sold book of the last decade I assu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:41 PM
–

So now it's "majority" and not "overwhelming majority"? Do you realize how pointless it is to list a bunch of mostly positive qualities and say the majority of women are attracted to these? Gay men would find most of these qualities desirable in other men. So would lesbian women in other women. Also "looks" and "charisma" encompass a wide range of attributes - the overwhelming majority of women are definitely not attracted to the hypermasculine "Chad" you guys think they are. They're also not at…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:18 PM
2

What do you mean? I was only making the point that the answer is obvious. No normal person would want to be treated the way OP is describing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:56 PM
–

>You haven't understood the argument. This part wasn't addressing your argument, it was pointing out that you're drawing an analogy between two wildly different things that can't be compared. >The overwhelming majority of women are.. Except they aren't any of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:53 PM
–

>there is NO situation where all ANYTHING is like anything. No sane person will say otherwise. >the overwhelming majority of women are like that That's where you're completely wrong. The overwhelming majority of women don't behave anything like how Red Pill claims they do. While gendered conditioning 100% exists, there's huge variation in women's behaviour across their entire population. Warning underage girls to be wary of adult male groomers and "warning" adult men to be wary of adult women in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:24 PM
–

I obviously wouldn't feel good about it. What sort of question is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:16 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with any of this but these points are tangential to what was originally being discussed. This is supposed to be a debate sub - I'm really not sure what we're debating anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:01 PM
1

How am I misinterpreting your arguments in bad faith? I'm simply placing 2 assertions made by you side by side and pointing out how logically inconsistent they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 07:40 PM
1

It may seem that way to you if you spend a lot of time on the internet. But it really isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 07:29 PM
–

Again, the manosphere is still a pretty small minority of men in the world. What they think doesn't coincide with what regular men who aren't part of (and quite likely haven't even heard of) the manosphere think. Belonging to this category myself, I find your "levels" rather hilarious. And yes, for men levels 2 and 3 are mainly based on physical attributes. Again, this isn't "for men", but only for a limited number of men from the manosphere that you've interacted with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 07:06 PM
1

I mean I think of my own relationship pretty much every day, but not sex or "attractive women".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 07:00 PM
–

Are there ways in which your feminism carries over into your dating life?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:57 PM
–

I'm.. really not sure what your comment has to do with the topic at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:52 PM
1

You've missed my point. I was talking about lookism as a societal phenomenon i.e. people generally treating people they find attractive better than they do people they find unattractive. This is a fact. That doesn't mean there aren't decent people who treat everyone well regardless of how physically attractive they find them. That also certainly doesn't mean conventionally unattractive people can never date/get laid - I mentioned nothing about this at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:50 PM
–

I don't see the logical flaw in this stance. I don't hold it myself, but for the men that do, wouldn't the fact that all women supposedly not wanting to sleep with virgins be precisely the reason for them "pissing and moaning" about women not giving virgins a chance? Don't know if I'm missing something here. >How do young men ever become non virgins if almost none of us give them a chance? Both can be virgins I guess? That is fairly common.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:43 PM
–

I'm not sure which men you've been talking to, but this really isn't close to accurate in describing how men view women. The men on this sub are not accurate examples of male behavior in the real world. I'm also curious, is the distinction between your Levels 2 and 3 solely on the basis of physical attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:37 PM
–

So then, according to your logic, on the one hand he's been dealt the "death sentence" of being 2" below average height. But on the other hand, he has some unknown physical quality that makes him so irresistible to women, that it not only compensate for his "death sentence" but also allows him to pull of "being a manic pixie boy or any [blank] boy"? Do you not see the massive contradiction in your arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:32 PM
–

It's disingenuous to dismiss pretty privilege as a "chronically online view about looks and gender". Men absolutely do treat women they find attractive better than those they find unattractive, generally speaking. People generally treat people they think are attractive better than those they think are unattractive. It's a very real, widely acknowledged, and documented phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:17 PM
–

Yeah well this guy seems to be from the US where he's a good 2" below average. So you're logic of "Being a manic pixie boy or any [blank] boy works wonders when you're above average" falls apart no?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:00 PM
1

As far as im aware its men that do this. That's not true at all. Men and women both do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 09:47 AM
–

You've taken generalizations way too far with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 09:46 AM
1

I agree with your first para but what do you mean by "sexual competence"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:55 AM
1

If you find fat people gross that's your problem. Hasn't stopped the people you've described from finding happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:52 AM
1

I mean there's enough women shorter than 5'2" who wouldn't mind a man that height. Some women taller who wouldn't mind too. You need to find your type and filter out the rest. And not be thinking the way you think coz that's waay more unattractive than being short or fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:51 AM
1

I'm 5'3" and Indian (not a janitor though) and have done alright so..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:47 AM
5

He really is a handsome fella. Gotta agree with some of these dudes though, you're quite a bit "above average" so there's a grain of truth to what they're saying. Doesn't negate the points you've made either.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:45 AM
–

"Above average" in terms of what? He's below average in terms of height at least, which a lot of y'all think is a death sentence when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:37 AM
–

>I never really minded being the more experienced one. Even took a couple “virginities” Good for you. But I'm not sure that's what most women want. >But I am telling you, nobody cares if I cry when I’m sad or tell a deep secret. Would you describe yourself as conventionally attractive? Because there's a big difference between in how people (especially men) react to vulnerability in women they find attractive (which usually conforms with what is conventionally attractive) vs not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:34 AM
3

But how "people actually are" is influence by conservative ideals in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:22 AM
5

You were so close..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:23 PM
1

From anecdotal experience, they certainly can.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:22 PM
-1

Testosterone <> libido
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:20 PM
5

Ignoring the tangent you went off on, I'm just stating plain facts - if >95% of penises are between 4-7 inches, saying this range is 'average' makes no sense. There's a huge difference between 4 and 7 inches. If you'd said around 5 inches or something, that would have made a lot more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:17 PM
7

All he said was that's a massive range for 'average'. Which it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter