Home

OnTheBorerland Archive

View 1 post and 23 comments by OnTheBorerland on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Edu./Occu.OnTheBorerland/r/MensRights12/09/17 07:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Reeeeeeeeeedee!
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:49 AM
2

Brutal...
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:13 AM
11

If Vice is toxic, and they call us toxic, does that mean we're not toxic? Sorta like magnets repelling? Answer: no. The good news is: we support human rights, while Vice is dog shit. Hopefully that clears things up, philosophically.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:09 AM
1

OR, the egg/vagina penetrates the sperm/penis. Makes you think doesn't it? (just kidding)
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:57 AM
10

Is it just me or should this man be burned at the stake? Edit: Hornbeck writes that she sat through a little more of the presentation and then left the room and went to the bathroom, where she found at least 10 other female RAs and said that many of them were crying. Oh dear lord...
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:54 AM
4

lol you got wreckt.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:53 AM
8

Um, the word "dictionary" refers to a collection of ultraviolet light. What the hell did YOU think it meant? lol.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:48 AM
1

I'd be very interested in knowing whether there's a term in philosophy to describe an instinctual bias. Because it's pretty clear that's what gynocentrism is. It's rational in a jungle sense ("protect the womynz and the chillenz!") but it's certainly not rational when you have billions of human beings and men and boys are needlessly suffering.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:35 AM
1

It's still stupid.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:17 AM
13

It's quite shrewd really. Not at all. It's retarded. But since human beings apparently have a gynocentric bias, they can get away with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:08 AM
3

Vice is nothing if not noble. Noble: possessing, characterized by, or arising from superiority of mind or character or of ideals or morals Errr, perhaps not.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:16 AM
7

full liberal Huh?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:14 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:11 AM
2

She's awful but she did the right thing on this particular score, do you agree? Also, I think it's worth drawing a line between "public education" and "state education." States can become tyrannical just like corporations, and technically the North Korean education system is public. Look at it from a leftist perspective. Until very recently "American history" classes were unmitigated horseshit. Massacres and even genocides would be papered over in favor of inspiring tales of white men taming the…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:11 AM
4

In some cases perhaps. But mostly I think it's 'cause rich women's boys are being falsely accused on a now regular basis. If it were just "MRA" groups consisting solely of males complaining no one would give a shit. But Devos actually met with a group of mothers whose sons had been falsely accused. ID politics are powerful, but not as powerful as money.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:03 AM
2

It's certainly a fair complaint. But it's important not to paint everyone with one brush. For example I could just as well argue that most conservatives supported the Constitution-destroying Patriot Act. It's also true that many conservatives didn't succumb to the hysteria about terrorism and spoke out in support of civil liberties. the left has been far more damaging to men in this respect (unfair application of law I don't actually think that's true. Most unjustly imprisoned men are not there …
/r/MensRights13/09/17 01:30 AM
13

men can be more than emotionless strong lumps Men have never been "emotionless lumps". We are simply more solution oriented. "Learning to behave more like women", taking even more responsibility for the actions of others (including women), and blaming ourselves for problems that are often external to our own behaviors is not going to help men and boys. What we need are real changes in the legal system and real institutional reform. Feminists have no interest whatsoever in helping men. How could …
/r/MensRights12/09/17 09:30 PM
14

According to CAFE’s Ottawa chair, David Shackleton, the group’s detractors are the ones missing the point. “Our evolutionary history has taught us to empathize with women and children, and not with men. Men were the protectors, and women and children were the protected. If you empathize with the protector, they can’t do their job; if you care too much, they can’t put their life on the line. “The result is that when women and children are in trouble, we want to fix things for them. When men are i…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 08:27 PM
3

A decent amount of the leftist responses so far have been supportive of reform. Indeed the World Socialist Website has condemned "Dear Colleague" from the beginning. It's difficult to talk over a thousand screeching feminists unfortunately.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 08:09 PM
12

lol someone on KIA just noted that "Duke University Men's Program" is an acronym for DUMP.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 08:02 PM
5

White knights are out in force on this one.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 07:57 PM
27

DeVos herself has met with “men’s rights activists” who dismiss claims of sexual abuse. Wut. Not only do MRA's not dismiss claims of sexual abuse, we are the only ones who seem to care about male victims of sexual abuse. But yeah, let's attack the one group of people who stuck up for due process rights on campus while everyone else was succumbing to moral panic.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:10 PM
4

This gender-neutral way of determining custody, now known as the best interests of the child doctrine, had for its purpose the ideal of taking the decision making of who gets custody out of the hands of the parents and making the children more of a player in the process. Although on the face of it, this movement towards a gender neutral process seemed fair, actual court decisions still heavily favored women, showing to most that Maternal Preference was still the overriding standard. In the 1970’…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter