Home

TheBrokenWorld Archive

View 1 post and 75 comments by TheBrokenWorld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
81

TheBrokenWorld/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks, much appreciated. I wish talking helped.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 07:22 AM
1

Whatever. Enjoy your hate-filled little world, asshole.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:12 AM
1

As I said, you seem unable to accept that a view different from yours is valid... A) You're not being clear about your views and are making me guess what problems you have with my views. B) You're just as rigid in your views as I am mine. At least I've explained my views clearly and provided sound reasoning for having those views. The mens rights movement IS NOT ABOUT WOMEN, or their rights, period. It's men's. I've shown how some women's right also affect men. Either way, most MRAs will disagre…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:15 PM
13

The emotional damage caused by being physically hurt by a woman is incredible. I lost my job, my friends, my apartment, my cars, and eventually, everything because I couldn't function like a normal human being when I was being abused. I'd say the emotional damage is the most difficult thing to deal with in any abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:08 PM
1

I've never seen anyone in this sub who would disagree with what I'm saying here. In fact, I think most of the people here pride themselves in being sensitive to the needs of both men and women. You seem to think that being an MRA means that you need to hate women and be against their rights, you're dead wrong. YOU are the one who doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:40 PM
1

You're a pompous little tit that can't fucking think, is what you are. Female reproductive rights affect men? How? Because a male is involved with reproduction! You've obviously never had a girlfriend, or even an emotional connection with a woman or you'd understand that, quite often, men feel obligated to stick around to raise their child, even when that child was unwanted. If women don't have the right to have an abortion or don't have easy access to birth control, this is likely to happen mor…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:19 PM
1

Except that I'm not a feminist, moron. I'm just not so stupid that I don't understand that certain female rights issues affect men. You can't even explain your side of the argument, at least I can explain why I think that female reproductive rights are also an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:00 PM
1

You're not even making a point. Either make a point or fuck off. Moron.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 09:43 PM
1

No, but women should have the right to abort. No, they should have a right to choose whether or not they want to take responsibility for a child. My point is that if women have access to birth control and the right to choose to have an abortion, there is less likelihood of lives (both male and female) being affected by the birth of an unwanted child. I do, and it's getting mighty crowded.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:39 AM
2

Do men pay child support? Do they they pay taxes? Do they live on Earth?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:24 AM
2

What the fuck does ANY of that have to do with mens rights? It takes a female and a male to produce a child. Human reproduction affects everyone.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:05 AM
1

That was probably an over-generalization. I think that it's safe to say that there are more rational democrats than there are rational republicans.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:03 AM
1

I see it differently. The right is just full of extremists, people who have beliefs that are damaging to the rights of both men and women. The left tends to default to facts and logical reasoning rather than irrational beliefs. Because of that, I think that there's a better chance that the politicians on the left could be convinced to see reason when it comes to men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:42 PM
1

I don't really care which party I'm a member of, as long as their policies are sound.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:03 PM
0

I'd rather have Obama doing what he's doing than have any republican doing what they typically do.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:20 PM
1

True, but it's better than the republican's anti birth control, anti-abortion, anti-science, misogynistic policies.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:07 PM
1

And the republicans are many times worse. The Bush administration should be tried as war criminals for war profiteering.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:05 PM
6

The entire republican party must be awkward for you. Obama's doing just fine.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 07:30 PM
5

Ahem... democrat here.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 07:02 PM
33

When that child reaches adulthood he/she should absolutely be told about this. Too many kids grow up with the wrong idea about what could happen in a relationship because so many of the people who have been taken advantage of keep their children sheltered as an attempt to spare their feelings. I grew up thinking that women make rational choices about when to have children, but if I had been told that some women bring children into nightmarish situations just because they really, really wanted a …
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:54 PM
3

As a guy with long hair, I wish I could say that I had some advice for you, but I don't think any of my employers have ever said anything about my hair. I went to an interview at an automotive shop with my hair down once because I couldn't find a hair tie, but I just told the interviewer that I usually wear it pulled back and got the job.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:33 AM
48

...and the title feels as if it's a miracle that she gets a life sentence. It is, kinda.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:58 PM
1

These people need to meet the current governor of New Mexico.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:25 PM
3

Imagine the cat fights!
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:23 AM
28

Reminds me of this.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:16 AM
0

Someone asked her and she responded and said she wasn't, I'm not convinced.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:46 AM
2

Not everyone has the money to pay for a lawyer. It's simpler just to avoid women.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:15 AM
3

Fun? No one brought up breaking things for fun. Things were broken because tempers were running high. If someone is breaking things in anger, that does not mean that they intend to harm someone or are even capable of it. Anyway, unless the guy in the OP explicitly threatened this woman, I don't think there's a case against him. Otherwise, punishing him just for being angry is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:22 PM
3

The guy I replied to was just talking about his dad breaking stuff. My dad did the same thing, everyone in the household always knew we were never in any danger of being hurt. My siblings and I have been plenty guilty of doing the same thing, while at the same time we absolutely abhor the thought of hurting a living thing. Edit: Made the last sentence a little more clear.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:12 PM
6

It's not against the law to destroy your own stuff.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:16 PM
6

20 mph over the speed limit is not safe, it's breaking the law by a considerable margin.
/r/PussyPass07/07/14 09:50 PM
13

My mom told me things like this all of the time when I was growing up, that men owed women because of the way women were treated in the past.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:59 PM
10

The camera on this aircraft is used for flying the aircraft, it doesn't have the capability to record people in any detail unless it's right next to them.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:12 AM
1

No. I actually feel safer being out at night because there aren't any other people around.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:25 PM
2

Most people equate liberals with democrats.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:09 AM
7

So you're saying that you wouldn't vote for a democrat even if they actively championed for men's rights?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:38 AM
6

There's no need to bring political parties into any of this.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:35 AM
12

It would be a shame to have MRAs associated with one political party or another, that would only result in alienating part of the group and in the elimination of some of the ability this group has to moderate itself. If MRAs become associated with the right, I can envision a dark future where it's dominated by religious wackos who believe that women should be subservient to men.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:56 PM
24

What's with the liberal hate on this subreddit? Many of us lean pretty well toward the left.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:24 PM
1

No, I wasn't even aware of your comment until you made this post. Frankly, I'm very surprised by your reaction to this. You didn't present any kind of argument or alternative reasoning, you just made some simplistic little insult that didn't say anything meaningful about anything related to the discussion. People get downvoted on reddit for presenting their beliefs on something that's important to them in a well reasoned manner, and you're whining about getting downvoted for making a mindless in…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:16 AM
5

Your comment was insulting and didn't add anything to the discussion, what did you expect?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:38 AM
2

I'm not defending this kind of thing, but many of the people here have experienced similar things with feminists. These feminists are much faster and much more brutal, often going into the negative hundreds of downvotes in a couple of hours.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:31 AM
2

The procedure is painless, I've had pubic hair caught in clothing that caused more discomfort, afterward is different for everyone. For me it was about like sitting on a nut, except the pain takes days instead of minutes to subside. It was a very forgettable experience.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:01 AM
30

Are there any studies that show a significant difference in the sexual performance of men who are circumcised vs uncircumcised? By sexual performance I mean how long they can typically have intercourse before reaching orgasm.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:35 AM
6

I only care about equal reproductive rights. If women can choose to take part in the conception of a child and then completely abandon any responsibility to that child whenever they chose to do so, a man should be able to do the same.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:03 PM
3

I'm just taking it as a rant, not some kind of call for change. And I hate to say it, but I found this hilarious and completely agree with it.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:46 AM
1

Why is that surprising?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:38 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:46 PM
4

It sounds more like she thought you two were dating and you were much too old for her.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:29 AM
-1

Please find me a military document that details how to compensate for the reduced speed caused by menstrual product changeout. Why would there be such a document? It takes time to change a pad, you can't compensate for it, it just has to be accommodated. Obviously it's not a major issue, but it's still something that is a detriment to a female soldier. If you are wearing an outfit that enables you to handle your balls, that's enough freedom to switch out a pad. Men don't handle their balls when …
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:21 PM
1

My point was that the most difficult battles had the Russians falling back into their own country, not venturing out of it. After Staligrad, the effectiveness of the German military was pretty well reduced because of the massive losses they suffered in Russia and because the Americans had joined the war and started to cause the Germans to really strain for resources. I can't say whether the capabilities of Russian women as infantry were inferior or not, just that it is my understanding that they…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:08 PM
1

I think you are wrong to call a woman solider less capable if she passed her combat ready exams. If she has passed those exams then she is just as capable as anyone else out their in the field. That is the point of the combat readiness exams. The requirements aren't the same for women as they are for men, they are made less difficult to accommodate women. Now that being said, I will admit that the test needs to be the same for men and woman. If it is gender specific then woman will never be seen…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 10:36 PM
1

In which my arguement to that was any logistical problems could be easily solved... Women can be accommodated, yes, but there's no way around the detrimental impact accommodating women will have on a military unit. My point is: Why should the military go through so much trouble to accommodate a less capable soldier?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 10:15 PM
0

I didn't say it was a deal breaker, I said it's something that has to be accommodated. There aren't any logistics about changing pads. There are when you have 60-70 pounds of gear strapped to you and your life can depend on how quickly your unit moves. Do you know why the M16 has such small bullets? It's because it's more of a detriment to the fighting ability of a military unit to disable soldiers than it is to kill them. I hate to be the one to tell you this, but less physical capability and t…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 10:11 PM
-7

Men carry all kinds of extras... Because they can. Female soldiers have trouble coping with carrying the basic necessities. And again: ...weight isn't really a huge problem, it's dealing with the logistics of changing pads and tampons and all of the sanitary issues that come with it that is a problem. Also.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:27 PM
1

But those are just emotional issues. They didn't like blacks, they can change their mind. Gays might get aroused when with a bunch of naked men, they can be mature and ignore it! You can't just change your mind about the amount of down time a female soldier needs, and you can't just ignore the logistics of supplying a female soldier with her needs. You also can't ignore that the average women is not as physically capable as the average man. There is a reason they have lowered standards for women…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:32 PM
-1

None of those issues were based on fact. A woman has greater sanitation needs than a man, that is a fact. I don't really know if I believe that women should be banned from combat, but I do believe that they should be expected to perform just as well as their male counterparts and some women certainly can perform as well as some men. Edit: Made that last sentence a little more accurate.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:57 PM
-1

Weight is an issue for any aircraft, in fact, it is the main issue. Also, soldiers have to carry their supplies, often for weeks at a time. And you're right, weight isn't really a huge problem, it's dealing with the logistics of changing pads and tampons and all of the sanitary issues that come with it that is. See more here.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:38 PM
-5

I know one thing for certain, BC doesn't work the same for all women and it has side effects that many women don't want to deal with. Should women be forced to be on birth control so they can be more effective soldiers? Or should they be accommodated in the field?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:32 PM
-6

True. But what about peeing and pooping? This is a natural function that doesn't always run on a schedule. I'm not saying it's not a problem, but I think that the army has overcome other problems that were more complicated Peeing becomes a more complicated matter for a female soldier because she has to deal with stripping off half of her gear. Pooping is maybe once a day, not several times a day, like when changing a tampon. Eh. OBs are super small. No applicator. applicators are the bulk. Plus …
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:30 PM
-44

Nope. 5 seconds. In and out. When sitting on a toilet. From what I remember, it's not quite as easy in a squatting position. You're also forgetting that a soldier wears a large amount of gear, so it becomes a much more complicated matter than pulling down some underwear and reaching up a dress. Also: super light and made of cotton. And bulky as hell. No waste. Except blood. Which is something a soldier should be able to handle. Except you have to clean it, right? Also poop in front of dudes, whi…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 09:18 AM
-5

I think the belief that anyone can be anything that they want to be or do anything they believe they can do is a little too pervasive at times. Even as a 5' 8", 145 pound guy I've come to realize that I am at a serious disadvantage in a great many things next to most guys. That said, there are a great number of roles in the military that women could excel in. lafielle has a pretty good amount of detail on that: Link.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 09:07 AM
-57

Soldiers have hygiene too. You can also, y'know, throw the tampons out and put new ones in. Soldiers these days have a thing called supplies, they use that shit. It's one more thing that has to be carried (and we're talking about a soldier who can't carry as much her male counterparts) and it's a pretty major inconvenience when it comes time to change it. Some soldiers are expected to be out in the field for weeks at a time (during wartime they might stay out for months), where there's not likel…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:14 AM
-54

I was going to say something like this, but maybe not in such a crude way. Women do make really crappy grunts. They really aren't as physically capable as males and they do have pretty major sanitation needs during a certain time of the month. Also, just pissing would be a major issue in the field, as they would have to strip off half of their gear to do it. And yes, the protective instinct men have toward women would cause major problems. I do believe that women should be required to sign up fo…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:02 PM
2

Completely irrelevant. People will have sex regardless of their understanding of the consequences. Having sex is something that is driven by the most basic of instincts and you're not going to stop the vast majority of people from doing it any more than you are going to stop the vast majority of people from breathing. The main focus here shouldn't be on trying to prevent people from having sex with things like abstinence only sex education or trying to scare people away from it with things like …
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:50 PM
3

You could take the risk of using a condom. 99% effective. Worth the risk of having a kid? Did that, brought a kid into a horrible situation. Definitely not worth the risk. You could take the risk of the woman using birth control. With both of you using birth control, 99.99% effective. Worth the risk of having a kid? That's her choice and not effective at all when she chooses to stop using it without her partner's knowledge. You could take the risk of not having vaginal intercourse. Barring shena…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:52 PM
2

It's basically the same as saying people should only have sex when they are trying for a baby. Why not advocate abstinence only sex education as well? Edit: To add to that - Basically, that's saying that a man should ONLY be allowed to have sex when he wants a baby. Or, only women are allowed to have sex without wanting a baby. Edit: Explanation instead of downvotes? If sex is automatically consent to have a child, what options do men who don't want children have, outside of abstinence?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:08 PM
2

A glimpse into my future...
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:26 AM
1

I'm in a pretty similar situation, starting over again from nothing. Actually, this time I have much, MUCH less than I ever did during the previous times. I wish I had some encouraging words to offer. I'd like to tell you that the solution is to stay away from women, but I know that's nearly impossible for guys who have that unending unrelenting need to share life with someone, like myself, and probably you as well. I guess all I can say is keep looking for a reason to pick yourself back up, som…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:32 AM
1

Women have a lot more power in this situation, so I think the first version is fine all on it's own.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:13 AM
2

Very much agree with both versions.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:29 PM
1

This is very very tough. On the one hand you want to be in contact with your son and in the other hand you never want to get involved with her again. This is one of the hardest parts of this whole mess. It's also very hard to be with my son sometimes because he reminds me of everything that's happened over the past 5 years. Thanks for the reply, the responses here are probably the most helpful form of support I have right now.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:31 AM
2

You had so many opportunities to end the abuse... Yes, I certainly did. But it's not like this isn't a common thing. Abuse victims often stay with and protect their abusive partners. Edit: I'd like to go into details about what was going on in my head that made me stay with her, but I can't now.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:57 PM
24

(Continued...) Things had started to get bad again just before the 2012 holiday season, but then she told me that we should try to have a good holiday together and things improved to a point where everything was better than it had been in a long time. I did everything I could to make sure we had a good holiday and I was able to do this because she had finally decided to stop making things so miserable, she let us just concentrate on being a family. As soon as the holidays were over, our good tim…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:40 PM
8

PRESS CHARGES. I am in absolute hell because I didn't press charges against a woman like this.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter