| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | UK man kills himself because of debt and universal-credit issuesThat picture of him crying, damn man | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 05:36 PM |
| 9 | A quick search on Tumblr. How is porn banned but hate speech isn't?Comparatively more than it is now? I'm sorry but that simply is not true. People are far richer now than at anytime in history, American or UK. The wages men got in the past were terrible for the hours worked. Hmm yeah, for the exceptions. I think it's fair to say that when the majority of those people are able to vote is what matters, especially in a democracy were the majority are the ones who choose who is voted into parliment. To blame it on the class system isn't true either, that's saying … | /r/PussyPass | 20/04/19 11:49 AM |
| 20 | A quick search on Tumblr. How is porn banned but hate speech isn't?No it really didn't, those wages barely allowed the average family to live a comfortable life. Like Rubin said, do you think you have it worse than your grandparents? The answer is no. In the UK men over age 21 were given the vote in 1918 (Representation of the People Act 1918) and some woman over 30 (on certain circumstances). In 1928 the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928 was passed which gave equal voting rights to woman over 21 as well. | /r/PussyPass | 20/04/19 11:24 AM |
| 30 | A quick search on Tumblr. How is porn banned but hate speech isn't?It's sad to think it's normal to believe that women were the only people to suffer in the past. Men and women for the majority of time have worked together, alongside each other. Men have sufferered just as much, if not more. Working long, hard days for 1 dollar! Men have died in the 10's of millions protecting their freedoms. And let's not forget that woman openly protested that they DO NOT get to vote and that they got the vote just 10 years after the men. | /r/PussyPass | 20/04/19 09:45 AM |
| 1 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.A lot of this information seems completely unrelated. A lot seems copy and pasted actually which is no argument at all. "I have been seeing woman"? "Consider the strong feelings"? You can suggest that employing woman may have done this, and I'm not saying you're wrong, but there's no evidence to suggest that's correct and there's plenty of competent men working in those areas. Unfashionable was the correct word to use there. Cause forcing representation from multi-ethnical backgrounds is definit… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 10:05 AM |
| 2 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.I don't know how you can defend any employment discriminating anyone of any race. You say they have a shortage but are willing to turn down white men, no wonder theres a shortage right? "Over-representation" is a buzzword of the progressives, they should be employing the best people who are the best at the job as an individual, regardless of race or colour. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 08:07 AM |
| 62 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.I couldn't agree more, and in places like the UK (my home) the Police will purposely go out of their way to employ everyone who's not a white male. And they call this "Positive discrimination", it's complete insanity. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 12:06 AM |
| 135 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.As seen in them fighting for positions of 'power'. And not wanting equal representation in other jobs that has almost 100% male workers. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/19 11:39 PM |
| 37 | ThisExactly, if a random person starts beating and choking you in public are you just gonna sit there like "cool thanks" | /r/PussyPass | 13/02/19 05:27 PM |
| 6 | ThisYeah I read it, what I said still stands | /r/PussyPass | 13/02/19 05:24 PM |
| 45 | ThisDon't worry, so was he? Im actually worried that despite the evidence that he defended himself, he also got fined. | /r/PussyPass | 13/02/19 04:21 PM |
| 3 | Gillette doubles down on hating all men - removes all downvotes. Boycott>DownvoteIt's so silly isn't it. Let's try to shame and blame our one and only target audience | /r/MensRights | 18/01/19 10:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter