Home

Upper-Professor4409 Archive

View 0 posts and 242 comments by Upper-Professor4409 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well if they enjoy sex then Im sorry but they arent asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:17 PM
1

That's not true, many gay men have sex and have dated women. Before they come out sure, but thats no different than a bi man lying about his sexual orientation. That is also incredibly untrue, since many asexuals date allosexuals (non-asexuals). Not saying it doesnt happen, but if someone wants a sexual relstionship its not discrimination for them to not date asexual people. It is simply not the same as women not wanting to date bi men, as Ive already said it means they have hang ups about his s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:06 PM
1

Its not discrimination for a non-ace person to not date ace people, and vice versa, because there is a sexual incompatability at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 08:15 PM
1

Well I pretty sure gay men arent trying to date women, unless he needs a beard. But yes, asexual men definitely date, theyre asexual, not aromantic, they still enjoy the company of a long term partner. They often seek out other asexual people for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 08:13 PM
4

Nope, no shame, I just dont expose info about myself that doesnt serve a purpose. Im at a stage in my life where I can afford to have casual flings, and if she cant accept me as I am after the casual phase then so be it. I dont really care to break the heart of someone who cant accept me as I am for such a petty reason as the fact I have slept with men, I dont respect that. And Im not even actively lying, Ive never had a date ask me about my sexual orientation, they just assume Im straight and I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:50 PM
2

There is a sexual and romantic incompatibility between gay men and straight women and there is a sexual incompatibility between ace people and non-ace people. There is no sexual or romantic incompatibility between bi men and straight women, if the bi man simply lied about being bi a straight woman would be none the wiser, whereas if an asexual man or a gay man were to do the same it would become quite obvious that they dont enjoy having sex with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:27 PM
4

Yeah probably, but I can come out after I know I want to go further with her. And if she has a problem eith that then yeah, we're not compatible. But Im not going to declare my biness loud and proud on the first date nor am I going to include it in my dating profiles. I dont see the benefit in that, Im not trying to start a polycule, Im strictly monogamous. Anyway, women consistently lie about thier sexual history, and the men they date are none the wiser. Thats fine, do what you need to do for …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:05 PM
5

Ok fine, us bi dudes will just continue to lie about our sexuality. Its a dumb prefrence if a simple lie is the difference between attraction and no attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:50 PM
0

Also, reported rates of infidelity in this study among heterosexuals are quite a bit lower than I’ve seen in other research In the study itself it states this so its clearly not as cut and dry as you make it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:10 PM
3

Because hes gay, he is not attracted to women, why would she date someone who is incapable of being sexually and romantically attracted to her? Why would he even ask her out in the first place hes fucking gaaayyyy. You know what that means right? This hypothetical is stupid on so many levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:06 PM
1

Ok then I guess almost everyone is dependent on their partner because thats the kind of arangement most couples live in nowadays. Hell, its also the arangement most couples throughout history have lived in. Any relationship where both spouses have to work to financially support the family are dependent ones by your definition. Thats not dependence, I was easily able to replace the financial contributions my ex made by simply finding a roommate. She stayed for so long because we werent on bad ter…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:54 PM
0

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:29 PM
4

The only situation where a gay man asks a woman to date him, and she knows hes gay, is if he needs a beard. Ofttimes gay men and lesbian women seek eachother out to be one anothers beard so they can freely enjoy their sexuality while still enjoying the benefits of heteronormativity. Otherwise the woman in this arrangement is getting some material benefit from her role as a beard. Thats not a romantic relationship its a practical one. And as for asexuality, sexual and asexual people are often not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:28 PM
6

Nope. Blue pillers often say high value men shouldnt let a womans sexual history affect his decision to get serious with her, and I agree with that sentiment, but it should be a two way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:13 PM
1

Yeah I dont agree with OP at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:08 PM
2

Would you say a group of housemates renting together are dependent on one another? Because thats not what dependence is at all, thats merely a practical arangement. If my roomate left I could re sublet the living room in a week because Im offering it for a very reasonable rate and as I said, thats rare in this economy. And if me and my girlfriend want to start living together I can tell my roommate he has to leave at any time. That is decidedly not being dependent on a person, but having a pract…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:07 PM
5

Men and women cheat at roughly similar rates, so I could say the same about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:55 PM
3

Nope, I just think its pathetic to care so much about what others do with eachother when its literally not harming you in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:53 PM
5

Hey in this economy its not at all unusual to need two people to an apartment to pay for it, thats not dependance, thats mutual support. Me and my ex lived together for like 6 months after our breakup because it was impossible for either of us to find anywhere else to stay for a reasonable price. Its only after she got a new boyfriend that she was able to move and I had to sublet the living room of the apartment to make rent without going into the red.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:51 PM
-1

If anyone here is offended its you lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:45 PM
11

Im saying women who refuse to date a bi man because he is bi are discriminating against him because of his sexual orientation. Y'all blue pillers always say men shouldnt care about a womans sexual history, so why is it suddenly ok to care about a persons sexual history when a woman does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:43 PM
6

Bi is also a sexual orientation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:38 PM
-1

Wow, youre a sensitive one arent you? Do you faint when you see those newfangled moving pictures too?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:36 PM
3

Bi men statistically are more likely to cheat. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:33 PM
8

Yep, thats why I dont tell women id like to date that Im bi. Fact is a majority of women still want a man that embodys traditional masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:31 PM
0

You have no clue what sex between men actually is because you have never experienced or even seen it. And no, porn is not an accurate representation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:28 PM
1

Discriminating aginst someone because of their sexual orientation is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:24 PM
1

I agree you dont need to give a reason for why you no longer want to continue the relationship, but I still believe the right thing to do is tell them you dont want to continue the relationship, even if it was casual. Ive never ghosted a match, I dont want to leave them in a state of limbo in which they arent sure where we stand, I feel thats a shitty thing to do. And sometimes they have gotten aggresive, at that point I feel justified in blocking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:12 PM
1

People are owed basic respect, and being clear that youre no longer interested is part of that. Ive never ghosted any of my matches, if I dont want to go any further with them I tell them so theyre not left in a state of limbo where they arent sure where we stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:03 PM
1

Oh please, as if y'all haven't said worse things already Who tf do you mean when you say "y'all" If men are so vulnerable to sexual assault then they wouldn't have made fun of/get offended when women take precautions to prevent SA, they'd also take precautions to protect themselves and not say shite like, " I wish I was him, lucky guy!!" to male victims of SA Because every single man says and does these things, not just a subset of shitty men. As a victim of SA myself I dont begrudge anyone for …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 03:05 PM
2

Most things feminists whine about today are as silly as most things men on this sub whine about so, yes, you can respond the same way When youre angry with the way the world is, remeber; "se la vie." The rest of what you say doenst warrant a response, sorry No, you just dont have a counter argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:54 PM
5

Have you considered the possibility that what people are willing to say on an anonymous online forum is different from what they'd say to their partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:51 PM
7

Most of women are less emotionally resilient than men, men are consistently expected to put up with situations that would make most women break down. Men are expected to regulate our emotions to a far greater degree than women, its just more socially acceptable for women to open up that emotional valve and release the pressure, whereas men are expected to stuff it down and carry on like nothings wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:49 PM
5

Male mental health and suicide is not part of the manosphere. And are men not allowed to dislike or voice our anger at the gender role thats been foisted upon us? Or is that something only women are allowed to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:41 PM
1

Ok but I wasnt asking about randos on reddit, I was asking what you consider to be wee wee crybaby behviour in a romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:38 PM
4

What do you mean when you say whining? A vulnerable example is my fiancé sharing how he felt like an idiot saying goodbye to a teammate because the teammate held out a fist, and he held out a hand. The guy changed to hand, and my fiancé changed to fist. Thats not vulnerability, thats self deprication, which is actually a way to avoid vulnerability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:36 PM
4

such is life Wow, what a calous take. Should I respond the same way to women when y'all voice your frustrations with gender dynamics? And no, women are no more vulnerable to sexual assault than men. Disregarding all other factors except physical strength, men are marginally more capable of retaliating against sexual assault committed against them. But thats far too simplistic, ability to retaliate does not equal a lesser vulnerability. In reality a mans options when sexually victimized are heavi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:33 PM
3

What would you consider to be a "wee wee crybaby"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 06:37 PM
–

Yeah Trump wont fix anything at all, but the intention for a lot of his voters is not to fix their own life, its to make others suffer. Misery loves company after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 09:02 PM
–

Yeah Trump wont fix anything at all, but the intention for a lot of his voters is not to fix, but to make others suffer. Misery loves company after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 09:02 PM
–

I'm in my 30s, still live with my parents, and I STILL can enter relationships with men I'm attracted to at any time I see fit. See how the standards are a little different for men though? I highly doubt a man in his 30's whos living with his parents would get much of any success with women, regardless of his looks. Men have to hit certain milestones at very specific points in our life to be considered attractive. Thats part of the reason why men still out earn women and tend to occupy higher po…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:42 PM
3

but only a small percentage of men try to lose weight let alone go to the gym, this tells us that a sizeable reason why most miserable men are that way. The obesity rates between genders are roughly equal so this is a moot point. If obese women are unwilling to date obese men then those women need to adjust thier standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 03:00 PM
1

no other war but class war Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 05:57 PM
0

I mean, isnt that what Im doing? And why should I trust what you have to say on the matter, youre a man. I dont usually ask the women in my life about their sexual experience with men of different sizes, that would come off as very creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 05:54 PM
1

I mean is this a commonly held belief among men with larger members, that they dont need to put in effort because of their size?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 05:52 PM
4

If his size makes him think he doesn't have to put any effort in, it's a minus. Have you and/or your friends noticed that this is a common sentiment?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 02:13 AM
5

This. Who wants to bend over/stand on their tip toes to kiss their partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 02:12 AM
1

Yeah It really depends man, my uncle was severely physically abused by his ex wife and it culminated in her smashing a half bottle of liqour across his head. He still has some motor control issues due to brain damage 10 years later. Because of my personal experience and that of my family I dont view female on male physical abuse as any less severe than vice versa. The strength of humans is not in our raw physical ability, its in our capability to use tools, and both men and women are capable of …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 06:09 PM
2

But why? If a woman wants to give her child up for adoption that child is now the responsibility of the state until they can find new parents for them. Why is it ok for women to leave a child to the state but its not ok for a man to do the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:36 PM
2

A guy who beats his wife is worse than a woman who verbally abuses her husband As someone who has been a victim of both, the physical abuse is scarier in the moment, but its some of the things my ex said to me that have really stuck with me and caused lasting pain. Physical wounds can heal over time, mental wounds are more elusive, you can think youre over them, but then they come roaring back when youre in a dark place.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:31 PM
1

The 4B movement is as dumb as MGTOW, so yeah, its invalid. 4B doesnt have a monoply on womens issues advocacy, you dont have to agree with them to advocate for womens issues. Youre black an white thinking is indicative of a severe lack of maturity. easy, I was there when it was created So youre talking out of your ass, thanks for clarifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 09:23 PM
0

I have, my city has a massive Korean expat population and the Koreans Ive talked with would slap the shit out of you if you tried to tell them women are second class citizens in SK. Doesnt mean women dont face specific problems in SK, but those problems fundimentally stem from class. What you're really saying is "Ask a 4B member" but why tf should I? Theyre as deranged as MGTOW, and MGTOW will say men are second class citizens. Second class citizen is a very serious term with a set definition. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:54 PM
1

No oppression anymore! When did I say that? Not saying women dont face problems in south Korea, but those problems are fundimentally rooted in class oppression. Same goes for mens problems in SK, they stem from class. But to say South Korean women as a whole are second class citizens is ridiculous. "Second class citizen" is a serious term with very specific conditions. A second class citizen is politically and legally disenfranchized. Women are neither in SK. Any system that can elect a woman to…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:43 PM
1

It was created because South Korean women were tired of being second class citizens South Korea has has had a female president, women are categorically not second class citizens in SK. MGTOW was created because men weren't getting as much sex as they wanted. No it wasnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:22 PM
0

4B started in Korea by women who have little rights in a heavily patriarchal society. Women do not have little rights in SK, thats preposterous, theyve had a female president.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:14 PM
1

And how is 4B any different? Its mostly just women bashing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:13 PM
–

Ok so is manosphere content just rage bait, or is it a worrying trend?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:45 PM
–

Culture does not give a person the right to dictate others sexuality of gender expression. If a person identifies as gay or trans thats their prerogative, others who share their culture have no right to tell them how to live their life just because such life choices arent a part of their culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 05:44 PM
–

Some people talk about male or female brain but it is by no means a broadly accepted theory among gender studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 05:39 PM
2

No, she was excusing the behaviour that OP pointed out by saying that there are also asshole dudes who say dumb hateful shit. Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 10:23 PM
4

The 4 laughing emojis tells me you are taking this seriously lol, very tryhard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:37 PM
4

Ok, then all reddit misogyny is rage bait that youre falling for.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:32 PM
3

Tiktok is proof as much as reddit is. If snything its more proof because tiktok is significantly more popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:28 PM
8

What more is there to be said about shitty misogynistic men on reddit? They get lambasted regularly for their dumbass takes and rightfully so. All Im saying is if you want your message to be heard over theirs then be better than them, otherwise it just becomes two assholes shitflinging.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:26 PM
11

Ok then, just like those misogynists youre not worth listening to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:23 PM
11

"Men" as in some rando on Reddit who didnt even get any upvotes. I reqlly dont understand why feminists will point out this behaviour in men and say how awful it is, but then turn around and participate in the exact same behaviour. Dont you want to be better than those misogynstic men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:04 PM
2

I mean yeah same here, Id be kinda weirded out too if someone made it to their mid 30s without ever having an LTR. But these tiktoks are saying men being single in their mid 30s is a red flag regardless of his relationship history.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:01 PM
1

The gender war is a very modern phenomenon
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 04:57 PM
8

men complain "+18 women should be able to make their own decisions" Thats not a complaint its a statement of fact. This growing tendency to infantilize young adults, especially young women, is harmful. If we dont grant young adults responsibility over themselves they will be stunted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 04:57 PM
–

I mean, its not just men who are saying that gross shit, all the perpatrators of these crimes seem to believe theres nothing wrong with a female teaxher sleeping with their underage male student. And theres a significant number of women who jump to the defense of these statutory rapists by saying the boy wanted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 02:45 AM
–

Apps absoluetly do not work how theyre advertized. Their is documented evidence that suggests their designed to encourage hookups and casual flings instead of serious relationships. And of course they are, if they were successful at getting their users into LTRs they would rapidly lose their userbase. No, they want to make sure you keep coming back for more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:09 PM
3

All high quality studies, large representative sample size, with consistent definitions and review from researchers trained in rape myths and bias determine that the rate of false accusations to police is between 2-10 %. Blue pillers cite this number as if it strengthens your argument, when it really doesnt. Thats still a 1/50 to 1/10 chance that a sexual assault allegation is false, thats huge. Its a perfect example of why all allegations have to be scrutinized, and why defendants must be assum…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:48 PM
0

I dont like to categorize people into "high" or "low" value, I think thats dehumanizing. What I look for in a woman is high compatibility because I know the things I value in a potential partner do not encompass the whole range of things that can make a person valuable. First off she has to be beautiful, appearance is important and Im simply mot going to ask out a woman who I dont first find attractive. But for me attractiveness is not purely physical. I have seen the beauty of a woman just melt…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 03:45 PM
7

Studies have been done on it and the researchers found no correlation between violent videogames and propensity for violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 12:22 AM
9

Videogames do not teach a person about anything related to war. Thats like saying kids playing make believe with sticks are training for war.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:21 PM
3

Ok, one side does that and the other side does that plus deploys tradtional ground, sea and air forces. Guess whos going to win...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:19 PM
4

Idk about femdom, but quite a lot friends throughout my life have told me they wished their girlfriends/wives took a more proactive role in the bedroom. Like they felt it was almost always up to them to not only be the initiator of sex, but also be the one to set the pace and make the decisions during it. I myself have felt that very same feeling, and although I didnt bring it up it was a part of the reason why I felt we should break up, I too want to feel desired and relinquish control sometime…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 02:27 PM
1

Idk, I just hear from a lot feminists that mens problems are mens alone to fix, and that we shouldnt ask women to help or to change, we should just shut up about our problems because us talking about them somehow detracts from womens issues. But in this case it is a pervasive problem across gender lines and it will take all of us to change things for the better. So thats where I get the feeling that a lot of feminists are unreceptive to any suggestion that the toxic ideals about masculinity held…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:20 AM
2

Yes it is a part of machismo, but we have to remeber that this form of harmful masculinity is upheld and enforced by women too, not just men. For myself and a lot of other men it was our mothers or other female relatives, and the women that we've been in relationships with that were the primary enforcers and encouragers of machismo. It was my mother, not my father, that told me boys dont cry. A lot of the women in my life believe that men are supposed to be rugid, stoic, and strong, and to be re…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:42 PM
–

Fsir enough but dont you think those guys are assholes?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 05:34 PM
4

There is still the notion that women are weak and thus won't do damage to men. Id say its not just that, theres also a deeply ingrained macho standard at play here that tells men they are supposed be tough, and that admitting pain or suffering is weakness, and weakness is specifically reviled in men. I agree that there is still a pervasive and harmful stereotype that women are weak, but it can also be beneficial to women in some ways. It gives women permission to be weak, which is fundimentally …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 05:02 PM
–

How do you feel about guys who dont care to sexually satisfy their psrtner?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:43 PM
4

Point out where in my comment I ever agreed with the OP, I just stated something that happened to my family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:33 PM
5

But my comment isnt contentless agreement, its a personal anecdote that is relevant to the topic at hand. Like seriously I have never seen this rule enforced in this way on any other debate post, I see plenty of people agreeing with the OP all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:28 PM
5

How is this circle jerking? Through personal experience Im pointing out how its hard for men to even recognize theyre being abused until something extreme happens, because our culture tells us that female abusers either dont exist or arent harmful in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:21 PM
3

Youre just wrong buddy. Look up the Duluth model, its a prime example of the invalidation and systemic discriminstion that male abuse victims are subject to, and it was adopted by police forces and judiciaries across the western world. Its changing slowly, but many still believe women cannot be abusers, or if they can abuse its harmless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:16 PM
8

Yep, this is caused by the nuclear family concept that refuses to die. Post WW2 the nuclear family in a suburban castle, disconnected from one another beyond the occasional garden party, was marketed as the "traditional and healthy" family. This could not be further from the truth, the nuclear family is a thoroughly post modern concept. Truly traditional family structure places large extended families within a tightly knit and culturally homogenous community, essentially a tribe, or a family of …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:05 PM
–

My Uncle didnt recognize his alcoholic ex-wife was abusive until she smashed a half full bottle of liqour across his head. To add insult to injury the cops tried to arrest and throw him in holding for the night, but the EMTs insisted they bring him to a hospital. Thank God they did because he had a brain bleed. He lost hearing in one ear and is still suffering from brain damage to this day over 20 years later. And the best part? His ex never spent a day in jail, the cops didnt even think to char…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 03:36 PM
17

Yes but broadly speaking our society is far more likely to recognizes them as an abuser. And if someone sees signs of abuse theyre far more likely speak up and take action if the victim is a woman. Female abusers can get away with physically assaulting their man in public and chances are no one will intervene, some people will even cheer as if its funny or entertaining. Like it wasnt too long ago that the Duluth model was in widespread use by police agencies across the western world. The Duluth …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 03:22 PM
–

How is ragebait meaningfully different from hate?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:33 PM
11

A lot of feminists have been telling men that their standards are harmful to women for years now, and that men need to adjust those standards for the sake of women. But when we say womens standards are harmful to men its suddenly "just personal prefrence bro, no changing it." Just be consistent. Are all personal prefrences imutable, or should we ask people to broaden their prefrences to be more inclusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:24 PM
7

Im talking about the guys who assume attractive men are bad people because they think they can get away with worse behaviour. If you assume attractive guys are more likely to be bad, then yes, Im talking about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 03:17 PM
11

Its jealousy, they project their own negative thoughts and actions onto these attractive dudes because they know themselves and they would do horrible things if they were as attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:46 PM
1

Have you ever told a lie that was believed? Congratulations, you've successfully acted.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:25 PM
0

And why do you think people who can act never apply that skill in their personal life? And there are plenty of people who can act but arent in the acting business.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:44 AM
2

They can have very high self worth but its entirely reliant on external factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:42 AM
3

They hide their true selves by acting like a good person until they have their claws in you. Narcissists and those with BPD lack a stable sense of identity or self worth, they measure both by external factors such as popularity, recignition and wealth. Without an identity or self worth words and actions are just a means to an end, a way to satisfy the ego. Because narcissists and those with BPD lack self worth they dont intrinsically value other people either. Other human beings are only valuabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:13 PM
7

It depends. If a person repeatedly gets themselves into bad relstionships, or they keep going back to a person thats bad for them Im going to tell them they need work on their judgement. Otherwise, yes, its bad advice. Some shity people are really good at hiding how shit they are until youre invested.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 03:07 PM
1

The CEO absoluetly does not get to decide those things, they would be fired by the board of directors if they even tried to. No, the board of directors chooses a ceo based on his ability to find and manage talent, not to be the talent. A lot of focus testing and market research is involved as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 02:02 PM
0

Im sorry but youre just wrong, what gay men find attractive and what straight women find attractive often overlaps. Also the fashion industry isnt entirely gay men, thats an ignorant myth. There are plenty of female designers that make clothes for men and they get to choose the models that wear their fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:02 PM
1

Bullshit, many of the biggest hearthrobs for women started out in the modeling industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:25 PM
3

All of this yes. Also when it comes to beach/pool attire formless knee length trunks are the opposite of sexy. I see so many guys with great physiques wearing these and it does them no favors. They dont have to be super form fitting, but they should be nicely tailored and not go lower than the middle of the thigh, let me see them legs!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:15 PM
2

And I beg to differ, any vietnam era anti-war sentiment died long ago. Afghanistan and the Gulf wars got major support among the public and media class in there initial phases.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:06 PM
5

After Vietnam, the draft is so politically toxic that neither party can trigger it, at least for another half century if not more. The draft has been politically toxic every time its been used, even in WW2 and the Civil War, two wars where the best case could be made for its necessity. It being a radioactive political issue has never stopped a draft from getting bipartisan support because the wants and needs of the DoD will always supercede the will of the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:29 PM
6

Likewise, the current president bragged about not starting new wars and keeping America out of foreign conflicts, only to immediately start threatening Denmark, Panama, and Canada. So then why do you believe mens concerns of a draft are unfounded? And saying that the last draft ended over 50 years ago is not a compelling argument. Before WW1 there hadnt been a draft in the USA in over 50 years, that didnt stop the US government from bringing it back.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:01 PM
7

A lot of women in my country are concerned about the status of reproductive rights because of whats happening in the USA right now, even though none of our political parties intend to take away womens reproductive rights, and reproductive rights are written into our countries equivalent of the American Bill of Rights. Would you say their concerns are invalid?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:12 PM
7

But accusations of sex crimes carry a lot more weight than anything else you mentioned, some see them as equivalent or worse than murder. Like even among convicts sex criminals are treated as pariahs worthy of violence. Because they are so serious we have to scrutinize sexual assault alegations more than most other crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 10:47 PM
1

OP did not specifiy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:42 PM
3

I only get with people who give me what I want and need. So then youre just like the guys OP is calling out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:13 PM
1

It depends, how long are we talking? If she wants to wait to make it more special, then sure, Id be willing to wait. But if it extends longer than like the first 5 or so dates it would raise some questions that we would have to talk about. And Id have these questions regardless of her sexual history. Like if shes really that serious or into me, is she seeing someone else and weighing her options? Or does she have hangups/baggage thats holding her back? Things she may need to work on before enter…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:38 PM
–

What about the beauty standards society places on women, arent they harmful?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:27 AM
2

Thats not true at all. The practice started in the early 1900s, and has remained present to this day. Ships are just designed so well now, and safety protocols are so advanced that no passenger or crew has to be left behind. The feminist researchers who made the claim that "women and children first" does not exist used survival rates data without looking at context. They took instances where the men did abide by "women and children first" and catagorized them as "every man for himself" because m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:08 PM
1

Prove that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 01:41 PM
1

Why is it ok to discriminate against men in regards to schooling and childcare? Its a well known fact that elementary schools and childcare institutions favor female candidates and thats partly why those profrssions are so female dominated. Why is it ok for post secondary istitutions to advantage female candidates with female only grants and scholarships, or preferential treatment towards female students in admissions? On the other hand, why is it considered discrimination for professions that r…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 01:39 PM
2

I dont believe its the biggest threat to feminism, but it is a threat for sure. Their beliefs arent too disimilar from fundimentalist Christians/Muslims, they just come to different conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:37 PM
1

Id like to point put that this happened far more often under the American occupation and secular rule of Afghanistan than it did before or after American pressence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 08:34 PM
–

I agree that a significant ammount lf of the panic is online. But I do also see it IRL. When I was still in uni there were regular radical feminist seminars that would scaremonger about how dangerous everything was for women on campus. Disregarding the fact that the city my uni was in is among the safest in the world, and the part of the city its in is known for having a nearly non existent crime rate. It was just a level of fearmongering that was entirely inappropriate for the reality of the si…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:30 PM
–

Agreed, its important to be wary of every stranger, man or woman. But its the constant fearmongering that really grinds my gears. Like in my country of nearly 40 million people about 200 women were murdered last year. While every one of those deaths is tragic, is it really enough to warrent the ammount of paranoia some of the women in my country have about men? Enough to say that every single man is a potential killer waiting to happen and should be treated accordingly? I dont believe it is. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:21 PM
–

The law is predicated on coercion. The threat of law enforcement is the only way to ensure laws have any meaning and are followed. Its the reason why law enforcment and the military has a near monoply on legal violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 06:59 PM
3

OF does not require its models to have sex. A virgin could be an OF model.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 06:38 AM
–

Thats an irrelevant distinction. My point was that plenty of men do care what kind of csreer their partner has.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 06:37 AM
3

Simple. If you wish to receive the benefits of living in a nation during the good times, you must also be willing to support it when times get hard. And what if he doesnt feel his countries government has been doing a good job? You seem to believe citizens owe their life to the state, which is again, kind of fascist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 03:34 AM
1

What if a man doesnt want to fight for his country because he no longer believes in his country? Should he just be thrown in jail or shot for being anti-patriotic? Because that sounds a lot like fascism to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 03:32 AM
–

Plenty of men wont date an OF model.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 12:08 AM
1

Im sorry but I disagree with this entirely. Its predicated on the old myth that women are not sexual beings, that women merely put up with sex to please their partner. If this were true why are there so many women who are willing to get into and stay in bad relationships, even ones that dont materially benefit them? Why are there women who seek out casual hookups? Why are romance novels that the reader is supposed to self insert into so popular among women? The truth is most women arent perfectl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:20 PM
9

Modern medicine does not stand by the notion that needs are linearly hierarchichal, base suvival needs on their own are not enough to maintain physical wellbeing. The heirarchy of needs makes the false assumption that humans are perfectly rational beings, but mental and physical needs are understood to be strongly intertwined, both affecting eachother deeply. A lack of social interaction or intimacy can and will lead to mental health conditions that have negative effects to physical wellbeing. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:12 AM
1

Im not dismissing those quotes, just stating the fact that the article itself does not coroborate the quotes or try to argue their verastiy. Good journalists include the statemnts from both sides of a topic in their articles. That doesnt mean everything quoted in the article is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 11:18 PM
1

There is as much evidence in the article for "justification for the feminists to do what they did" as there is evidence that they "did" anything at all. Or were the instigators. You're just dismissing your own source, which is fine if you want to leave it behind The article itself does not coroborate the statements the feminists made, nor does it affirm their claims of incitement. The feminists were protesting and blockading the entrance to the auditorium where the talk was being held. And when …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 08:22 PM
1

Again, it's clearly not a situation of "feminists versus that one woman". It's a situation of "violent anti-feminists made it clear they would be present at the speech, and feminists didn't want violent anti-feminists on their college campus." And there is no actual evidence that there were any violent anti-feminsits at the talk, and the article does not site any incitement to violence, it merely cites feminists who claimed to hear incitment to violence. So again, no evidence and no actual justi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:23 PM
6

Do you have an example of one of these situations? https://youtu.be/YiRasOrIoYQ?si=xxALvyei8hpr8kjq https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/1795036262044160414/video/1 Heres a handful of examples. My first link covers one event at U of T that was a talk regarding male suicide awereness, feminists protested it and succeeded in getting it shut down. And the second limk covers multiple instances of feminists sabotaging mens issues awareness. the article explicitly states that discussion around the speec…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:54 PM
0

What women’s issues? Well its obvious women who vote for Trump dont care about abortion rights for one. I outline why I said that in the post. Read the post And I found your argumemt unconvincing. In my experience as a man plenty of men care and talk about mens issues, we're just not doing that around women. And your argument that men dont care about mens issues because were not as zealous as MAGA fans is flawed, because you could say the same about faminism. Feminists arent as zealous as MAGA f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:43 PM
1

Such as? I have a feeling I know, but I want you to say it. A majority of older white women voted for Trump, and a signficant portion of young women also voted for Trump. Anyway, that was not my point. My point was that some women not giving a damn about womens issues does not mean all women dont care, or that men shouldnt care about womens issues. Men in general dont is my argument. Not true. You just think that because men generally dont talk about mens issues to women. Especially women like y…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:14 PM
7

And here I thought women were supposed to be better at multi tasking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:11 PM
6

Im sorry, what are you asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:06 PM
9

Its was mens issues meeting, stop being willfully ignorant/obtuse, its obvious that feminists were protesting it because anarchism has no quarrel with mens right activism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:06 PM
6

So when feminists are anti-mens rights activism are men justified in going into their meetings to sabotage them and vandalize them? And the articles you posted dont prove theyre anti-feminist either, criticizing individual feminists or certain feminists principals does not mean a person is against the entire concept of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:00 PM
1

Women dont care about womens issues. Example: plenty of women voted for Trump. This idea that some men dont care about mens issues, and thats why no woman should ever care about mens issues, is really flawed. Just because some women dont care about womens issues and actively vote against their own best imterests doesnt mean both men and women on the left should stop fighting for womens rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:54 PM
1

Ok, but thats your choice. Why should someone else who does not want to fight be forced to remain in an active warzone? And if this violation of rights is neccesary why should women not be subject to this aswell? Women are also capable of serving in the armed forces.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:50 PM
1

Trust me, homophobia rarely prevents a person from engaging in homosexuality, it just makes them more eratic and potetnially violent afterwards. I Know from experience. And in the other major ongoing conflict, the Israel Gaza war, its actually far more common for males to be raped. Rape is very common in Israeli concentrarion camps, and the inmates are by and large men and boys, some of whom are as young as twelve. And its not just male guards commiting these acts, female guards are chosen for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:44 PM
1

How is forcing specifically men to remain in an active war zone not both gendered discrimination and a violation of human rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 02:30 AM
1

Because implying sexual violonce is a concern primarily for female civilians erases the fact that rape is commomly committed against male civilians and prisoners of war. I really dont understand what is so hard about recognizing rape is something that civilians of both genders suffer from during war.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 01:52 AM
1

But female civilians dont face more impact, the rape of male civilians in war is also very common, and adrocide(systemic killing of males 15 and up) of civilians is far more common than femicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 01:28 AM
3

Sexual violence is commonly commited against men during war. Just look at Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo, and many Americans cheered for that during the war on terror. Sexual violence against Palestinian men and boys in Israeli concentration camps is also a common occurence. And before anyone tries to say this is men doing this to other men, no, its not just men doing this. Many female guards actively participate in these crimes, female guards are specifically chosen for the job because it is thought …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 12:43 AM
1

The white feathers werent a feminist movement. They were a British government sponsored pro war movement. And the bomb making feminists came way after rhe early feminists Im talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:49 PM
0

There is no amount of purity in a men's movement that is going to be "pure enough" for ideological feminists not to find something thats misogynistic. Thats why I say we need to ignore them whenever possible, and engage calmly if we must. When we engage with their anti-male rhetoric in a combative way we essentially legitimize it, they become "truisms" that we're forced to debunk because of the negative stereotypes we're already working against. We have to recognize that theyre coming from the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 08:16 PM
6

Did either movement even try to police their members? Ime most feminists and BLM activists do everything in their power to excuse or downplay the bigotry coming from their ranks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:40 PM
4

Yeah this sub really needs better moderation, I think rightwing users need to be flaired appropriatly so we can know where theyre coming from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:38 PM
4

as if feminism wasnt full of misandrists. Not just used to be full...but still full Shouldnt we strive to be better than that? I think we have to try to ignore feminism. Criticize misandry and feminism when and where it misrepresents or dismises mens issues, but this endless tit for tat gender war, that ammounts to nothing more than oppresion olympics, is a waste of time at best and harmful to our movement at worst. I agree that prof you quoted is a misandric ass, and that kind of rhetoric is al…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:25 PM
-6

I mean, it goes both ways. The MRA movement hasnt done a good job of keeping far right influences out either. Just look at the top posts and comments of arr/MRA, its riddled with rightwing talking points that are mostly upvoted. If we do decide on a new title to work under we'll need be very vigilent in policing it to remove bad actors on the right that inted to co-opt the movement to their own ends, and also those who want to discredit mens rights activism by saying purposefully inflamatory thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:02 PM
5

I believe MRA as a title should be abandoned by anyone who actually wants to advance mens issues. Not only has it been dragged through the mud by those who are against mens issues activism, a lot of genuine mysognists have used that title to push their own vile ideology. In a way both the mysoginists and misandrists have succeeded at posing the MRA movement in oposition to Feminism, and I dont think productive conversation can happen under that paradigm anymore. I dont really know what our movem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:51 PM
1

I made a quick guess of 1300 and 1000 based on the graph, my bad. 1078 is only 36% less than 1689. So again, the difference is not as significant as feminists make it out to be. Men are just murdered by aquaintances and strangers at such a significant rate that it dwarfs the number of men murdered by a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 05:44 PM
1

The stats are for 2021 but the point still stands https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 And no, the numbers are very clear, women are not significantly more likely to be murdered by their husband than men by their wives, the likelyhood is roughly equal. Men are just murdered by aquaintances and others at such a staggering rate that it dwarfs the rate men are murdered by a spouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 07:33 AM
2

Again, youre just wrong. Like women, men value compatibility when choosing a long term partner as much if not more than physical appearance. There are some shallow people, both male and female, who value looks above all, but theyre not the majority of either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 09:31 PM
1

I would tell her to be cautious of any stranger. Many women participate in the sex trafficking industry as perpatrators, they actually prey uppon this very notion of sisterhood and the myth that women are safer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:40 PM
3

Last year in the USA about 1000 men were murdered by their wives and about 1300 women were murdered by their husbands, so no, this idea that men pose a unique risk to their partners is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:36 PM
4

And your statement is also just an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:21 PM
6

Thats simply not true. Men are just more forgivning of certain personality quirks in women, like shyness or awkwardness.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:55 PM
7

The ND women I know dont really stuggle to get relationships. Sure they dont have men falling all over them like some NT women, but they dont struggle nearly as much as some of the ND men I know. And these guys arent socially inept either, theyre good at coping with and working around their difficulties, but ime women are much less forgiving of ND traits in men even if theyre well hidden.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:47 PM
1

Almost all men do care about friendship for the sake of it, I do not understand where anyone got the idea that men in general dont value friendships. But when has friendship ever been enough to completely fill the void of loneliness? When youre a chlid it is. But almost all adults want to have both friends and a romantic partner they can spend their lives with. The vast majority of people desire a romantic partner, so much so theyll stay in bad/unfulfiling relationships just to avoid being alone…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 09:00 PM
–

Thats what the US governement would like you to believe, but its simply not true. Americans had the privilege not to be drafted into either Afghanistan or Iraq because Afghanis and Iraqis were drafted to serve as rank and file grunts for the meat grinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:23 PM
–

Oftentimes they conflate it with the draft despite the fact that there has been no draft in the United States in 50 years. So what? Before WW1 there hadnt been a draft in the US for almost 60 years, that didnt stop them from implementing one. Just because one hasnt happened in a while thats not a valid argument to say it will never happen. And I see a lot of comments on this post saying a draft would never happen again because it would be unpopular. Bullshit. The draft has never been popular amo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:15 PM
2

I didnt say he wasnt a cog, just more important than the average cog, male or female. And no, they dont particularly value women. Theyre happy to place women in factorys that are likely to be targeted by the enemy. Im not saying women cant be in the army. Women can be capable pilots, tank crew, seamen, drone operators, and logistical support, and many other roles. But the fact is a vast majority of women are not cut out for combat infantry roles, and infantry is the backbone of an army.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:29 PM
6

So women are repulsed by neurodivergent men, and thats somehow not their own problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:47 AM
4

Men in fields that are considered critical to the war effort are exempt from the draft and placed in locations that are likely to not be targeted by the enemy. Those at the top see you as another cog in the machine, and they see women in particular as cogs that can make more cogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:39 AM
1

And why does it depend on the person more often with women than it does with men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:49 AM
0

And what is that reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:44 AM
2

If women are capable of doing them why arent they?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:43 AM
–

What the fuck are you even on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:41 AM
2

This is the dumbest thing ive read all week, bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:40 AM
1

Physical strength is not becoming less useful, to the contrary actually. AI is advancing rapidly, to the point that most legal, writing, customer service, and admin jobs will be made obselete. While robotics still has signficant hurdles to overcome before it can replace trades, resource extraction and agriculture jobs. It may verywell be that robitics is impractical no matter its advancement to replace the latter jobs I mentioned. And trades/resource extraction/agriculture arent all physical str…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:39 AM
7

Oh yeah, and how would you feel about getting forced to go to war?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:27 AM
–

Nope. The vast majority of women wash out of basic infantry training.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:25 AM
–

More women are obese than men. The fact of the matter is the majority of work done that actually keeps a roof over your head, the lights running, the water flowing, and food on your plate is still done by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:22 AM
10

You dont know how large scale war works do you? Plenty of the boys they sent off to die in WW1, WW2, and Vietnam werent up to the fitness standards of the army during peace time. But peqce time standards fall by the waysaide when the war machine needs fresh meat to grind.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:18 AM
1

The first two links are news articles, so theyre essentially worthless drivel. Journalists often take studys and spin them to completely misrepresents the actual conclusions of the study, to serve their own partisan ends. From the last link, the one thats an actual scientific paper: Again, these data do not prove that these custody reversals were ill-advised; the data tells us nothing about why the courts deemed the mothers to be worse parents than the fathers Why are these articles assuming the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/25 04:09 PM
6

Youre just wrong though. Education is by no measure a level playing field for men and women. Multiple studies show teachers grade female students better for the same work as male stuedents. Admission departments have been instructed to favor female candidates over male candidates for years now, all things equal, they will pick the female candidate 9 times out of 10. And there are countless grants and scholarships specifically for women on top of all the ones that are gender nuetral, there are ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:47 PM
1

If friends is all a person needs why is everyone not fully satisfied with only having friends? Why is it that 99.9% of people desire to have a romantic partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 10:36 PM
3

Its a white lie, theyre preserving her feelings. She needs to eork on her humility. Like lets flip it around. Think of a guy who is super average looks wise, hes even a little obese, but he claims hes really smart and he also thinks hes hot shit, hes confident and hes obnoxious about it. Do you find that type of guy attractive? Now think of a guy who is looks matched and just as smart as the guy above, but instead hes humble, dont you think he would be a lot more attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 05:06 PM
7

Plenty of fat men, and even some normal weight men, are willing or even seek to date fat women. Its actually been studied and shown that women tend to have a more stringent weight prefrence than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 04:57 PM
2

Yeah no, her friends are lying to her to save her feelings. They know just as well why shes single, and its not because shes smart or confident. Its because shes obnoxious. Women dont like men who are over confident or a smart ass either, in general those are bad traits to have. Both confidence and inteligence need to be balanced with some humility for them to ne attractive traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 04:55 PM
2

I mean, you hear plenty of unsuccessful men claim to have lots of opportunity and they get ruthlesslesly torn to shreds, called liars, etc. When an unseccessful woman starts to go on about how she gets so much attention i highly doubt it. Like maybe she gets a lot of matches on dating apps, but thats not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 04:49 PM
7

For example hyper gamified dating apps that enable and encourage antisocial behavior because it’s profitable If you think about it, what incentive do these dating apps have to actually help anyone find a relationship? If anything they have the opposite incentive. If they actually match you with a good partner, and you both get serious, theyve lost two customers. These apps only want you to get into hookups or short term flings at most, because thats what keeps you coming back for more. I dont ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 04:43 PM
1

Women are always going to have far, far more suitors than men are. It's just the way it is. I mean, unless theyre willing to accept polygamy, thats factually incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:16 AM
3

No but there is a cultural stigma applied to men who are diagnosed with mental health conditions that is simply not present for women. This discourages a lot of men from seeking help for mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:02 AM
3

The point is going way over your head. The fact that so many more women are medicated for mental health issues shows that more women sre getting the professional help they need.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:28 AM
1

Plenty of men were sterilized for being deemed "mentaly unfit"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:25 AM
1

And many women act like this online as well
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:32 PM
1

How is it imaginary? Do you think the USA will never go to war again?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 06:17 AM
1

Its not an imaginary draft, the draft has been used mutiple times throughout US history. And refusing to sign up for selectice service is a removal of rights. A man cant vote unless he enrolls in selective service.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:21 PM
1

Nice whataboutism. Abortion rights or lackthereof is dependant on state, whereas every male in the US is subject to selective service.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:28 PM
1

Not the American people, the American government thinks it needs it, meaning it intends to use it in the event of a large scale war. The selective service act is very unpopular among voters of both sides of the political isle, but it has bipartisan support from politicians. A mans rights being contingent on consenting te get drafted is a clear instance of institutional sexism, your insisetence otherwise is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:06 PM
1

If the US government doesnt intend to use selective service why does it still exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:48 PM
0

My country already requires community service to graduate high school
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:45 PM
-2

But if a woman wants to abort solely for financial reasons shouldnt she be entitled to it? If so why should a man not have that right as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 03:06 PM
2

I think he means girlfriend as in friend who is a girl, not romantic partner
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:05 AM
2

The two largest predictors of child abuse are poverty and single parenthood. Deadbeat fathers are major contributors to this problem. Single parenthood isnt always the fathers fault. I know its just one example, but my brother was abused by his ex wife, so bad that he had to divorce her eventually. Even though he was begging for at the very least an even split, he wanted full custody because of her abusive behavior, the court decided he would only get on week a month cuatody. He even provided ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:18 PM
1

It is a fact, not a hypothesis. Its not a fact. Its an assumption made from a flimsy corelation. There has been no research to suggest ammount of time spent with a child leads to abuse, there are plenty of parents who spend all day with their children and yet dont abuse them. Mothers who abuse children generally have anger management issues. And why should poverty be an excuse? Is poverty an excuse for a husband to abuse his wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:42 PM
1

Was I talking about sexual abuse? No. So why did you bring it up? Id also like to point out that instances of mothers sexually abusing children is rarely reported, and even more rarely acted on by authorities in comparison to cases of fathers sexually abusing children. Fact is theres a deeply ingrained cultural bias thqt tells us mothers dont do these reprehensible things. So its far more common than crime stats would suggest. Study backing this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2706553/ So…..pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:08 PM
-1

Ah yep, there it is, spending more time a child does not give a persom the right to abuse that child, the fact that you try to excuse and justify the bahviour of abusive mothers is frankly disgusting. This hypothesis that mothers abuse their children more because they spend more time with their children does not explain why single mothers are two times as likely to phyisically abuse their children as single fathers. And it also doesnt explain why mothers are more likely to phyisically abuse sons…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:49 PM
1

I agree that FDS is all fringe femcels not at all representative of the average womans opinion. But TwoX is a lot closer to the average lib feminist you might find offline. A lot of the talking points on TwoX are thd same shit I roll my eyes at coming from lib fem coworkers and aquaintances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:32 PM
3

If one man says something and then another man says something contradictory thats not them "being hypocritical" thats just two different people with different opinions, men are not a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:26 PM
-2

But women are responsible for their own behaviour. Turns out women are more likely than men to physically abuse their children. And boys are much more likely to be subject to extreme physical abuse while growing up. A common theme among violent criminals is a violent upbringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:24 PM
2

Oh great wise one, please grant us your wisdom on how one might choose better...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:20 AM
12

Its paradoxical how some people say a woman can tell when a "nice guy" is just being nice to lure her into a false sense of security, but cant tell if an abuser is being nice to lure her into a false sense of security. I tend to ere on your side of reasoning. No, people often cant tell when someone is being nice to them with ulterior motives, there are a lot of good liars out there. And yeah I agree "choose better" is a very calous and useless piece of advice, if you can even call it that. But b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:03 AM
5

So youre saying youve had instances where you wanted to fuck a guy again but he refused. You couldve avoided that by being more attentive to his needs in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 04:24 PM
11

And whos to say he wants to fuck you again?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 04:16 PM
5

Its easy for some men to get off, not all men. If she doesnt do any foreplay, and just lays down like a dead fish I will not be able to get off. I need different positions and effort on her part to enjoy sex, and youd be surprised how many women cant be asked to even do the bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 04:15 PM
–

I mean, that goes both ways doesnt it? Theres no good reason for a man to stay with a boring/unapealing girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 03:51 AM
2

I dont know if men who hold grudges from highschool are well adjusted, but from reading this thread I know for certain OP sure as hell is not well adjusted.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 03:32 AM
0

The studys show housework split is about 60/40 woman/man, but also men tend to work more overtime and commute further so it balances out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 03:15 AM
1

Because I know multiple women who hate men yet still persue hetero relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 02:25 AM
0

Would ypu say the same about an incel thats waiting for a 10/10 model to fall in his lap? Because I wouldnt, id call that mf delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:41 PM
1

Lmao, so next time a woman complains about beauty standards should I just call her ugly?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:28 PM
2

Blatantly false
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:26 PM
1

You could make the argument that mens standards also relate to family formation in that bueaty is generally a sign of good health. This is all just speculative. Fact of the matter is a majority of women still believe the patriarchal idea that their man should make more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:11 AM
1

No, but Dobbs is something that effects people here, and its fate is determined by politicians that people vote for. I dont think the Taliban care what anyone in the west says.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:49 AM
0

If Che was a mass murderer then so was George Washington, even moreso. Revolutions are messy. And his supposed hatred of gay people is completely fabricated, nowhere in his writings did he ever even mention gay people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:10 AM
2

Really? Cause I see news storys whenever the Taliban takes away more womens rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:05 AM
-3

What even are you talking about now?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:23 PM
-3

Ok so rules for thee and not for me, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:16 PM
39

Im constantly hearing women on reddit say mens standards are harmful and overly restrictive, and plenty of men listen. You see womens dating concerns brpught up in the media too. But when a man talks about womens standards its on him to meet those standards. From my point of view there is a double standard at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:14 PM
-2

And women have no reservations about pretending to like a man just to get access to his money. See how everyone can be made to look evil if you interpret it that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:08 PM
1

Id say a lot of thst has to do with the stigma about men who are abused by their wives, in the moment they were hurt by them but after both the police and peers dismiss their concerns they say their report was false. Id also like to point out that what you posted was a singular study, the one I posted is a meta analysis of multiple studies, so its stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:25 PM
1

How come every single bachelorette party my girlfriends have gone to has had a male stripper, and yet every single bavhelor psrty ive been to hasnt included a single stripper? Men and women are visual in different contexts, and it has a lot to do with whats considered socially acceptable for the genders. Id also like to point out that 30% of porn hubs userbase is female.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 07:00 PM
2

You can come to Toronto and enjoy our clothing optional beach, its the only public clothing optional beach on the east coast of Canada. But I urge you to please be respectful. And maybe try going nude, its very liberating, though I would avoid the weekends cause it can get very crowded. The clothing optional beach was started as a primarily LGBT space, but all these straights staring at us has made it kind of unwelcoming to the community. My buddy that used to go often wants a section of the bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:55 PM
2

What it means is there is no mental difference between men and women, just a physical one. Some feminists try fo suggest that women are mentally superior to men, and this study along with others disproves that. And I think we should all exercise the same level of self control, dont be violent towards others, thats a rule both men and women should follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:22 PM
3

I dont see how that relates to what I said, my point was that there are lots of women who are visually stimulated, because why else would these women be at the clothing optional beach being voyeurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:04 PM
3

Im sorry what is that supposed to mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:53 PM
5

Studys show that women are more likely to initiate domestic violence. Here it is if youd like to take a look: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2994556/#:~:text=In%20a%20meta%2Danalysis%20of,have%20used%20IPV%20more%20frequently. Women are just as violent as men, its just that people tend to get more hurt when a man is violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:39 PM
8

Women are not less visual, the format of porn mags does not appeal to the vast majority of women. I went to a local clothing optional beach last summer and the ammount of fully clothed women gawking at nude men would suggest that yes, women are just as visual, and just as perverted, as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:37 PM
1

Great, and there are men who value women for things other than looks, but its a fact that a lot of men have some pretty toxic standards about womens bodies. Dont you think we should strive to lessen/ eliminate the pervasive beauty standards placed on women? And on the other hand, dont you think the financial standards a lot of women place on men is toxic and patriarchal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:03 AM
10

Do you really want to be with a woman who is only in to you for the money? Wouldn’t you rather be with someone who is hot for you for you? I find this response to be a bit of a cop out because it could be used to dismiss anyone who raises concerns about broadly held standards. Like imagine saying the same to a woman who is ciriticizing the unrealistic beauty standards some men have for women "do you really want to date a guy that only values you for your body?" It completely sidesteps her critic…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:52 AM
1

I dont really care what they do in other countries. Its quite simple really, an 18 year old is not a child, at that point a person is physically, mentally and legally a young adult, and it is their choice who they would like to enter a relationship with. At age of young adulthood a person becomes responsible for their own decisions, its not the responsibility of the state or their parents to protect them from their own bad choices anymore. Relationships with large age gaps can be weired and even…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 03:54 PM
1

No, the anecdote is that you think these men would go younger, you dont know that. Id also like to point out that dating app users represent a very small portion of men who tend to be in their 20's. Theyre not at all representative of men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 03:25 PM
2

Well youre wrong, being attracted to someone who is over the age of majority is categorically not pedophila
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:18 AM
2

Ok so anecdotes is all you have, no actual evidence, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:16 AM
2

Just because a country isnt currently at war doesnt mean it wont ever be at war. The US government wouldnt put so much effort into administrating and maintaining the selective service act if it didnt intend to use it again, and as of now it only applys to men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 08:33 PM
2

Its unacceptable even for religious reasons. Female circumcision is banned under all circumstances, even for religious reasons in the western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 08:16 PM
–

Race is actually more predictive of behaviour in ragards to crime than gender is. Obviously this is due to social factors and not genetic ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 07:56 PM
4

Actually yes. Btw, most men have pedophilic preferences, sadly. Prove that please.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 07:46 PM
3

I agree that men should make a concious decision to compliment their friends more, I myself make an effort to compliment and uplift my buds on their style or their fitness when theyre clearly putting in effort. But I also kind of agree with OP as well in some regards, specifically in the way online discourse and mass media outlets address dating issues differnetly wether they come from men or from women. When men complain about dating we're often told we have to improve ourselves to meet the sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 07:33 PM
7

Well your dad is an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 06:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter