Home

beneficent2557 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,131 comments by beneficent2557 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,131 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Am I into game theory? Is water wet? Of course I am down with game theory. Would love to read V2. Btw, you should read Steven Pinker's The Blank Slate sometime, its instructive for understanding why the Feminist Model does not work. (At least I am applying it that way).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 04:41 PM
1

Cost of living is a factor for sure. As is pair bonding, n-count etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 03:41 PM
5

Federal Grants are inherently political
/r/MensRights20/08/26 03:36 PM
1

False equivalency. Men call each other on their bullshit more often than women do. Because we are competing with each other. Women have each other's backs because of what Schopenhauer calls their natural Esprit de corps... This phenomenon is also supported via psychological observations about women (in aggregate) being more prone to agreeableness and consensus building. If a truth is hostile to their perceived consensus, it is resisted and discarded. You'll likely disagree because of this same p…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 03:08 PM
1

Cratering birthrate is a multi-variable problem. One Formulation: Mass migration leads to social and economic instability, which drives up inflationary spending, which lowers cost of living, which causes women to delay for career progression and prioritize their "right to abortion," as a survival tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 03:02 PM
1

Also, you have no proof of that comment. I literally have never seen a woman be held accountable or even volunteer accountability for relationship issues. You can disregard my lived experience if you want, but you are just eroding your credibility in my eyes and anyone who has had similar experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 07:59 PM
1

It's legible, I can see the letters/characters you are using, however, your arrangement of said letters/characters makes no sense. Suggesting a cognitive issue, subliteracy, or illiteracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 07:55 PM
1

It's so weird you guys hold this belief men take accountability more while showing a victim complex to the most obvious examples of self-inflicted problems. "Per Capita"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 04:30 AM
1

I rest my case. The blind brag about what they can see 💀 You presuppose that my perspective is incorrect without ever fully grasping it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 04:29 AM
0

Keep going. This rant is very hinged and is not being screenshot for context of ever being take seriously. Go on! Still not English.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 04:28 AM
0

"Haters" my points still stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 04:27 AM
1

Even your examples are bad. "Inglourious Basterds" Quentin Tarantino wasn't adapting from source material, he writes his own scripts and everyone knew it was not a 1-to-1 retelling of WWII The Odyssey was hilariously bad, but it did not have intentional comedic elements, see the difference? IDK given how much you read, maybe you think this is an accurate portrayal of WWII?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:49 PM
0

Keep going. This rant is very hinged and is not being screenshot for context of ever being take seriously. Go on! I asked ChatGPT if this sounded like a stroke victim. It agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:45 PM
1

Objective would be “the movie was a hit”. The end. Yeah, a "hit" on Homer. It poorly represented the source material it illicitly purported to convey.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:28 PM
1

It reads like someone that cannot speak English.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:25 PM
1

If I did a movie pretending to be a drama about JFK and it ends with him going to the moon, you'd think that the writers broke the core of the narrative. I get you don't care about accuracy or truth over stacking paper, but for a lot of people, truth has more weight and intrinsic value than If Helen is repeatedly described as fair haired or pale armed in every depiction, and the producers have cast a subsaharan African, then it is reasonable to presume that the producers broke the core of the na…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:23 PM
1

Keep going. This rant is very hinged and is not being screenshot for context of ever being take seriously. Go on! Read this out loud and tell me it doesn't sound like a stroke victim on a speakn'spell... the grammar is atrocious. Comedy is about delivery and your punchline was thoroughly garbled by grammar and word choice. Unhinged and hinged are not opposites in vernacular English. It's broken English. Technically yes by definition, but practically no in daily speech. While "hinged" is the lite…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:17 PM
1

If you focus on the flaws of another person, and don’t acknowledge that you also have those same flaws, or you say “it’s only bad if someone else does it but it’s not bad when I do”, you’re a hypocrite. Or, we are trying to hold women to the same standards to which we hold ourselves? Men and women (in aggregate) have different areas of leverage in society. Women (in aggregate) seem to have more of this social leverage up front, hence their hypocrisy is more egregious because their behavior sets …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:10 PM
1

You’re talking to me. I am saying both men and women flaws. (1) I have observed that in aggregate X's do this. (2) Well I am X and I don't do this. (2) does not negate the validity of (1). (I don't believe your purported claim, regardless).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:04 PM
1

… as though men don’t also lie cheat and take advantage Who is held accountable for their bad behavior? Is it equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:02 PM
1

"You aren't consistent with your own stated beliefs" does not imply that I am perfect. Hell I am probably harsher on myself than my enemies. That doesn't excuse abusing double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:01 PM
2

Are you sure its men? I keep seeing these Gen Z women abusing Ozempic to get as skinny as humanly possible. I feel like its women feeding off each other's insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 09:59 PM
1

And you couldn’t detect it. Now you triggered. "Now you subliterate" not a dig btw, an objective diagnosis.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 09:52 PM
0

Oops! Its okay, your media illiteracy is well established. Fucking and politics are separate areas of life. Sorry this is news to you. You can't substantively speak to what the red pill is, you have thoroughly demonstrated this. All you can do is mald over rollo tomassi.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 09:50 PM
1

Where’s the strawman.? You hate the women you’re around and you think the women not around you are worse. Where is the accountability of that? Love the sinner, hate the sin. Its not that I hate women, its just that I have never met one that was held accountable for her actions in the same way a man was. Think about how many women that is. I have had genuinely good relationships with women, I have had deep and long-lasting relationships, whether its our culture or some ingrained biological thing,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:51 PM
0

There’s two different kinds? Oh you mean like when religions break into different denominations? Literally have nothing to do with each other outside of branding.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:12 PM
1

The blindspot of you complaining about an area of women that you refuse to disassociate with because you complain about every other group of woman too, claiming theyre worst than the women you choose to keep associating with? Running out of straw yet for these strawmen?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:11 PM
1

Its not sarcasm, you literally don't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:10 PM
1

It really comes down to an epistemic blindspot with your type of argument. Solipsism begets a myopic world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:45 PM
1

WTF does this have to do with Hypergamy? Also Fuentes? Really? 🤡 Those are two different kinds of redpills bro. Got more shitty slang or cringe memes to excrete at me? "R-Rollo Tomassi p-pissed on my lawn!" Nothing to do with contesting the merits of books like The Blank Slate. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:39 PM
0

Yeah calling it hinged…… that’s called sarcasm…. It's called being illiterate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:35 PM
1

"That'll disprove everything they say, c-checkmate Evo-pillers" 🤓 What's wrong with the consensus on hypergamy? Anything? Oh more ranting about Rollo Tomassi? Apparently this is what you think an argument looks like. Ad Homs are for "protesters" to sperg out to on the street, they aren't usually relevant to critiquing an idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:30 PM
0

Keep going. This rant is very hinged and is not being screenshot for context of ever being take seriously. Go on! You mean unhinged? Hinged literally means nothing in this context. Sure, go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:28 PM
1

At least Rollo allegedly took the time to read the sh♡t he supposedly "plagiarized." You can't even summarize two slop job youtube videos with the Gemini button.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:11 PM
1

A summer action movie got replaced with another summer action movie after it had been out a couple weeks. That’s exactly how the summer movie schedule works. Its a shitty movie, surrounded by other shitty movies. Imagine trying to die on a hill most people said “I liked it. According to what? A corrupted JSON File. It’s not best picture worthy or anything- but that’s not what a summer blockbuster action flick is supposed to be” Odysseus is supposed to be supernaturally charismatic...f♧cking Sean…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:09 PM
1

You didn’t watch any of the links to price the ev0- plagiarism-RP scam exposed. You didn't read any of the links I suggested, why would I take you seriously? Because you’re scared to. Like most religious fanatics. "It's problematic" Oooo Spooky
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:05 PM
1

As the saying goes, if you’re seeing an asshole everywhere, you’re the asshole. "Wow, I keep getting beaten up in Philidelphia for supporting out-of-town sport teams, I must be the asshole!" You have any more shitty aphorisms you want to share with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:03 PM
1

So youre not gonna change the women youre around anyways. I said "super majority" and my generational cohort. 😂 How big is that proportionally? Do you get that? it says a lot about you that you seem to never find women that are likable. Its not about being likable, its about being accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 06:01 PM
1

Why are you crying? I don’t know- maybe because the false narrative was destroyed when all that came out was an entertaining summer action movie. Which part of my criticism did you refute again? Nice straw man. Hey look its Helen of Troy:
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 05:59 PM
1

Any case movie made 1.2 billion, millions were entertained and the haters seethe It got pushed out of the top slot by a Marvel Slop Spiderman movie. Even playing a shitty numbers game, it's derivative dogshit. Agmemnon looks like clavicular in his shitty batman armor. He looks like he wants to tell Odysseus not to come to school tomorrow. Win. Win. Win. Even if it made 100 Trillion dollars I would call out the movie for being dogshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 05:56 PM
1

All I had to do was expose the TRP-EvoPsy lie. Which I did. Funny, I don't remember you addressing hypergamy substantively once. I saw you stamping your feet and holding your breath about dubious "plagiarsim" claims for a book you never read. Religious fanaticism is entertaining What part am I believing without evidence? I bet you'd mainline ebola if someone in a lab coat told you it was a vaccine.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 05:53 PM
1

More crying from the haters. Meanwhile millions enjoyed his work. Not everyone liked it. So what? Why would I cry over someone that apparently can't read a book? 😂 If the modern audience really devolves into a bunch of whiny IPad Babies, and this ideological slop makes 100,000,000,000.00 dollars, I will still call it out for being dogshit. Already established that the translation was bastardized to push a tone deaf anti-colonialist message. I think my reasons for hating both the production and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 05:37 PM
1

Bruh, are you sure you watched it? Cause it quite apparent you didn’t see what the actual people (which is currently at 1.2 billion in box office revenue) saw. So your “genuine belief” is probs the only real ideology. I genuinely believe what Christopher Nolan said about the translation he used, I know a lot about the woman who did the translation he based the film on. I knew a lot about the production history which was explicitly revisionist and ideological. The casting of Lupita Nyongo as Hele…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:42 PM
0

That’s who I exposed. Name one of the people I consistently listen to. (Rollo isn't in top 10) And your points have no substance. They are a religious fervor masking as “intellectualism” Prove it, pick one. But that was already exposed as a fraud. Steven Pinker? When? Again, you don't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:33 PM
1

Sounds more like you read reviews and didn’t actually watch. It looks like you cannot read my comments because I have said twice that I watched it. Its great from an affects standpoint, forgettable and flanderized from a writing standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:30 PM
1

No, no film can be as “faithful” an adaptation because even with 3 hours, it’s not enough time to perform the entire epic story. The Return was notably better. I knew you were not reading these comments. 💀 I cannot get past the ideologically driven production history and the translation he used was EXPLICITLY done for revisionist Feminist reasons. It editorializes to the point of bastardization. These are not just stories, they model cultural systems that had direct influence on historical and l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:20 PM
0

Except TRP doesn’t actually use any of the soft science- it just uses the buzzwords to try and sound smart. The people I listen to did (none of the big names you probably are thinking of). I stop watching when I hear the words "problematic interpretations," because as a rule, it has nothing to do with the accuracy of information being conveyed. You repeatedly fail to engage with any of the points I am saying on a substantive basis. Coo. Not surprised by your demonstrable disdain for reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:10 PM
1

So you like being around those women. Carry on then, If I am saying that a supermajority around me has undesirable characteristics then they are the only ones I have been able to find. Chronically online social media women are objectively worse. So your myopic "internet" suggestion is objectively worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:08 PM
1

So I can see you didn’t actually watch the movie, Randos saying the film is good is useless to me. Also the alleged reports of the manipulation of the JSON file on the IMDB page are hilarious. Also all those points on textual analysis were organic to me. I've seen the movie, and I have re-read the translations Odyssey and Iliad multiple times. Its got good elements in it, its just a shitty rendition of the Odyssey. The Return with Ray Fiennes was inherently better film imho. The ideological tran…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 04:05 PM
1

AND why Evo pscy isn’t actually a part of TRP, but simply used to “sound smart” because of a plagiarist using it to convince dumb men it will make them sound smart 11 days of me doing more important stuff. Irrelevant. The Blank Slate was literally my favorite book in Undergrad, and TRP resonated with me because I found that the models of behavior based upon the IRL incorporation of these concepts were better models for predicting how a woman was going to act under specific circumstances than any…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 03:50 PM
0

gods and heros and monsters? That intent from the author? Unknown Homer likely did not write the Oddysey or Iliad if his depiction of being a blind oral poet is accurate. It was codified in the Classical Period of Athens. The translation that Nolan based the film on was overtly ideological and political (explicitly done from a revisionist Feminist lens). The cyclops was likely based on the copious elephant and mammoth skulls that were found in places like crete. I like the depiction of the bow t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 03:13 PM
1

You have the internet, expand your area: Algorithmically curated reality is not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 03:02 PM
1

You- I bet you never read the Odyssey Me- I did actually. for school You- what does that have to do with anything Bruh, Survey courses (Western Civ) don't count. Was the Christopher Nolan film a faithful adaptation of the source material? And if it was, which scene was the most faithful to the Classical Odyssey?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:58 PM
0

Me- my opinion is irrelevant this is what the truth is. (Presents evidence) You have presented no evidence, you just have attacked the credibility of Rollo Tomassi, (I was discussing Steven Pinker), compared Evolutionary Psychology to creationism, and then randomly defended a film that was created from extremely ideological and deliberately bastardized translation of the Odyssey. You clearly have not engaged substantively with any of the subjects we were talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:55 PM
1

No one actually knows Homers authorial intent Pretty sure if Homer was a blind guy reciting oral poetry he wasn't physically authoring anything. The written version of the Iliad and Odyssey should be seen from the Classical Athenian lens. We know a lot about the cultural traditions that surrounded these stories and we have been finding archaeological evidence that supports these stories for a long time. There are a lot of useful Hittite records that provide context for parts of the Trojan War.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:50 PM
1

When you dont actually value morals, you'll end up being around people with none. That's why it's laughable to claim someone values loyalty when they're obsessed with shallow people. The super majority of women in my area and cohort were hedonic utilitarians and have no principle-based morality system.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:46 PM
–

I am not whining about women, I am critiquing hypocritical double standards towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:44 PM
–

Then why care enough to whine about women? How many posts have you created here? Why did you feel the need to opine on men collectively? Why are my tax dollars going to fund a misandrist Gender Studies Department? Why tolerate gender equity policy when it has overt double standards and clearly is only applied one way? If applying Masculine standards to women is bad, why do we tolerate applying Feminine standards to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:42 PM
–

I don’t care, take responsibility To take responsibility, you must first muster the ability to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 01:07 AM
–

So horny ass women. Just their ass?💀 Also no, women often signal attraction as a manipulation tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 01:06 AM
–

Like waiting around for women to talk to you and act super horny. How do you know a man is horny if he isn't talking to you? Incoherent and unsubstantiated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 01:05 AM
0

I brought up the fact that your review of these videos parallels the reviews of those who never watch a movie. I saw the movie and read the books. You are the one criticizing books you have never read and bragging about it. You're not remotely credible. I am gonna turn off my notifications now, have fun whining about Tomassi
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:33 PM
0

You- I bet you never read the Odyssey You are the one who brought it up, and I actually read it for fun, and the Iliad, and Sophocles, and Euripedes. I read them when I was studying abroad at Oxford. I actually liked a lot about the movie, but it was definitely a slop interpretation, if you care about literary accuracy or authorial intent (as far as that applies with someone like Homer). Still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:27 PM
1

Nah I had to read it in western Civilization. Notice how you couldn’t refute how it sounded the same. You know: like a bias who never watched. This has nothing to do with what we were talking about. Also the movie had bastardized elements from the Iliad and Oresteia. It wasn't the worst thing ever, but it wasn't accurate to the source material. You just liked it because of the special effects. Flash no substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:21 PM
1

“They were terrible!” Sounds just like all those Odyssey reviews that posted before the film came out. Then reality came. Let me guess, you never read that either. 💀 Thanks gor your irrelevant and useless hot takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:18 PM
1

I posted the valid criticisms and objective determinations from the scientific and psychological communities. They were all terrible, and literally invalid. You can't argue substantively about things you never read. You just lose bro. Go watch your slop podcasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:12 PM
1

I just understand that modern media provides a good informative platform as well. You're shitting on things you've never read. Literally bragging about pig ignorance. It's genuinely pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:07 PM
1

Ok don’t watch them. Thousands do tho. Further crushing the lies AND making the “im not looking” followers easy fodder to be mocked. Bro is out here bragging about not reading the books 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:04 PM
1

Not watching your silly videos, you already failed to give me the links I asked for. Go read a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:00 PM
1

20 years with not a single RP ever saying they got one, showing they got one, or even saying they were going into the field to study IS proof You can't prove that, and it wouldn't establish what you're saying even if you could. Go read a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:55 PM
1

20 years and not a single RP ever posting saying it declaring a degree is more than enough proof. You have no evidence of that and you can't prove that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:23 PM
1

I am not "attacking" you. Your argument is just terrible. You have no way of proving your ridiculous claim about RP people. Enough, we get it. You are obsessed with Tomassi. Goodluck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:17 PM
0

It’s still shit that came from an ass. Yeah I prefer Diogenes to this BS
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:18 AM
1

That’s why we know the RP is lies and trash just sold to desperate men. Then why are you not f■cking someone instead of talking to me? Are you just a jaded washed up PUA? Is that your deal? 😂 You seem a little too keen on Tomassi tbh Also you think money is the only thing that has value (probably why you don't care about reading).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:15 AM
2

Do you not know what a Praexology is? Rollo didn't invent that by the way, he just used it....seems like he was reading somebody huh? Who am I kidding, you brag about NOT reading books.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:11 AM
1

And the original author has disavowed any involvement in RP. And yet you are fixating on why people are NOT advertising they are RP in the admissions process...so what's your real issue with it? Are you pro simping or something? Did YOU read the Rational Male? You seem to have so many opinions about it. We already established you didn't read the Blank Slate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:10 AM
2

I don't think a man should just follow anybody. I think you have an obligation to learn and incorporate what you believe to be true. Parts of the Redpill resonate with me, but I am not married to it. I care about the truth of the claims being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:06 AM
1

That's great. If it worked for you. If you think you've found the path to the good life, stay on it. I just see bread and circuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:04 AM
1

What's wrong with being a 57 year old truck driver? I could rag on you for liking the Eagles or football, but its not really relevant to the claims being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:54 AM
1

lol you can’t make this up! An idea is separate from the man who utters it. Read some books.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:51 AM
2

Bruh just take the L. Rollo took your money and is a broke lonely loser. If you keep going with his Evo psych lies you’ll end up just like him. Rollo is not the Redpill, and I never gave him a dime. If you were actually reading you'd realize that by now. Did Rollo sleep with your ex or something? Something isn't adding up with you. That’s your call. But I’ll still show people what trash it is so they won’t follow. Considering you can't talk substantively about the claims being made...good luck w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:50 AM
1

So was he a fraud because he stole? Or was he a fraud because they were lies? Two separate claims. I am not watching your stupid video, you haven't given me any of the links I asked for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:47 AM
1

You don't have to like a person to recognize when they have a good idea. You're kind of petty bro. Communism sucks, but Marx had a good starting criticism of aspects of capitalism...you don't have to buy the whole thing, you know? The praexology thing makes sense. Sue me. I never gave money to any of these people. Also since you're so enlightened, so better off, why are you wasting time slugging it out with me? Don't you have stacks of cash and women? Since the Redpill is Wholly stupid right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:46 AM
2

They must hate tuition money and knowledge Gender studies is literally grandfathered in...you really haven't thought this through. It’s great! Nothing can change the fact that some (few) dudes got tricked by a losers with a red covered self published book. And he still went broke. Even after he screwed them by convincing them to waste years of thier life on to instead of actually going out and working on what it takes to actually pull Pull what? So far you are just pulling shitty memes out of yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:41 AM
1

I literally watched him say that, and it made sense to me. I didn't read the Rational Male book, just parts of the sidebar. If I was lying, why not just lie about reading the book? Your arguments are so half-assed on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:37 AM
1

You are saying he stole his ideas, not proving the actual ideas false. (Because you'd have to be able to read, reason, and substantively write). Its intellectually lazy. That's why you lose the plot with me. (And you are so bad faith in other areas, I have no reason to trust you on anything). You're literally just wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:35 AM
1

So you admit RP is clearly not something anyone capable of higher education should follow unless they were desperate to find confirmation bias. We know No, I am saying there is an overt institutional hostility towards anything that challenges the gynocentrist locus of control. Anymore words you want to try to puppet in my mouth? Figure out how to open a book yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:32 AM
1

Oh right TRP is about “pillosphy” lol! Tomassi just says its a Praexology, people generally agreeing a several key points, but there is a lot of variety in between that. Whine as hard as you like, but unless you are willing to read and critique, you'll just be another person to disregard on the sidelines.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:30 AM
1

Imagine if you cared about the truth and not trying to try and vindicate feeling and opinions. Nothing you are saying substantively addresses the claims that have been made. You are whining about Tomassi, but you can't seem to address any specific claim or passage. You lack yhe necessary depth to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:28 AM
1

“Don’t you see?! It’s true because only the scammers are the ones that post publicly!!” I dont see RP getting past admissions/HR. And that's for overt ideological reasons. Blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention. Thanks for your useless observation. Maybe try reading a book?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:25 AM
1

Imagine if you actually read the people you're criticizing and could engage substantively with me. Maybe I would take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:21 AM
1

Selfishness??? What are you talking about bro? We already established you don't read. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:19 AM
1

So how was Schopenhauer a hack?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:17 AM
1

But back to the RP. Of this knowledge was so special as RP claims, then after 20 years some would do it just for the knowledge. But none do The only overt figures in this space are ln YouTube, academia is actively hostile to this content. You are continuing to fail to engage substantively with the claims being made. Which is why I don't find you to be credible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:15 AM
1

Once again 20 years proved it for me I was learning about ancient Chinese texts the other day that were touching on ostensibly RedPill concepts. I am also starting Schopenhauer's essay on women. You really aren't adding anything of value to me. Which is why no one will care about your rhetorically myopic claims. Because you aren't addressing the utility TRP provides.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:12 AM
1

I read all of the Blank Slate multiple times. Never read the entire sidebar. That’s all we need to know! Right, whereas I care about the actual truth. Which you cannot speak to, all you van do is talk about Tomassi being a fraud...which is useless to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:10 AM
0

Facts don’t care about your feelings What I believe is dictated by what I believe to be the best argument and evidence. You apparently only believe what your podcasts tell you??? Nothing you are saying is particularly persuasive and you don't seem to be concerned with the substance of what is being said. You only care about Tomassi.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:06 AM
1

Paleontology was crucial to understanding vertebrate evolution, and you can't make a lot of money doing that either. You can make a lot of money selling heroin too, doesn't inherently make cartel members more important than normal people. Not everyone is in it for the money, or even getting laid. I am drawn to what I believe the most persuasive arguments are. Steven Pinker resonated with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:04 AM
1

I don't think value is predicated upon who gets paid the most, if that was true those HMO bastards would be more important than anyone else. I care about what I believe the truth to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:02 AM
1

I read the sidebar on r/TRP, but I never read the book myself. I am not sure if that was authored by Tomassi or not. I came through reading Pinker and other select research. I care more about the ideas than the man himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:58 AM
1

But no You cannot make any money doing this stuff, and being overtly RP leads to discrimination. I am not a PUA, but the data on Hypergamy and sexual selection strategies resonated with me and helped me make sense of what I was seeing IRL (Which was demonstrably irrational behavior otherwise).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:57 AM
1

I thought I was supposed to be a Rollo sychophant? I never read The Rational Male, but I did read Steven Pinker (who is not RP). I was able to see the crossover myself. Pick a lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:45 AM
2

Literally NEVER read the Rational Male bro. What I read in class (Pinker) and what I read online, helped me make sense of behaviors I was seeing IRL. I don't like the grifter aspect of the manosphere, but there are concrete things I could point to which helped me make sense of the seemingly irrational behaviors I was seeing. It was accurate to the point that they were able to reliably predict how people would act. I tested this in my own life, IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:44 AM
1

And I’m showing the “proof of concept” of RPs is not actually getting in a degree in the study they claim is so important. Prove it. Also just because you think something is important, doesn't mean you get a degree in it. I am passionate about paleontology, I genuinely believe it to be important. I would NEVER get a degree in it because it would be fiscally irresponsible. Because they know it’s just buzzwords a grifter used to sell books before he went broke. Literally never read Rational Male. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:35 AM
1

Contentless rhetoric. We already established you cannot link research papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:30 AM
1

Look, there are the degrees offered that RPs have never gotten! Because………. You were just arguing that these degrees don't exist. Now you want me to prove that a bunch of anonymous people are getting degrees in this? You've claimed that they aren't multiple times...so how do you know? Idgaf about what your feelings on Tomassi are, or the slop science content you watch on the YouTube side of things. Prove they aren't getting degrees in it. Your claim is overtly ridiculous. What Degree Do I Have? …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:29 AM
1

What I asked was why aren’t there any RPs getting them? Which is a stupid question. I don't know or want to know everyone who believes in RP stuff. You're burying the lead, you are arguing that evo psychology is fake while simultaneously arguing that RPers arent getting degrees in it. Two separate claims. You only care because of Tomassi, because you have a fixation on him. (how do you prove anonymous people are doing anything? We already KNOW that an institutional bias exists against RP content…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:24 AM
1

Hiding online with books isn’t going to do shit You do know what a book is right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:20 AM
1

That is why when Rollo comes up with his own original thoughts you get the insane stupidity of telling men to engage in medical procedures instead of using dick discipline including only using a condom. The fact that Myron read his book which stole all this information and has now exalted this clown will be his undoing if he doesn't wise up and realise that anyone with two brain cells can see through the charlatan. A plagiarist whose been married for decades who in his RP rage on some forum real…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:18 AM
1

They literally had a major breakthrough in showing it was falsifiable and subject to rigorous testing this year. Whatever methodological issues there are, illicitly conflating is to Flat Earther bullshit is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:17 AM
1

Must be because they are too smart and successful. Or they are actively discriminated against. Bro, you have a Tomassi Timeline and are hatewatching him on Rumble. Looking forward to another random podcast.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:05 AM
1

The possibility of a mix up is extremely low. They are putting trackers on infants right after birth now. Literally had a case happen this year 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:04 AM
1

I thought these "pseudoscience" degrees didn't exist bro? Random bullshit isn't helping your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:03 AM
1

Irrelevant to the conversation. What about these guys? https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/about/Buss Lab at University of Texas
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:01 AM
2

Thank you! I literally found PhD programs in it. He only hates it because of Rollo Tomassi.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:51 AM
1

Uh oh, look at all those Hack Frauds at Harvard: https://coursebrowser.dce.harvard.edu/course/evolutionary-psychology/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:47 AM
1

Helloooooooo Bro you better call UCLA before someone gets a PhD in a pseudoscience! Its just like flat earthers right? I am clearly just Darvoing right? (Whatever the f□ck that is) I literally asked you to look it up multiple times and you sent me a meme of a squalling infant. Uh oh, what is this? A Center For Evolutionary Psychology at UC Santa Barbara: https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:45 AM
0

I am not buying it lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:35 AM
1

There is no chance the baby will be mixed up. If your baby is taken away they have bracelets and ankle identifiers. Literally happens all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:33 AM
1

True specialization occurs at the graduate level. Programs generally fall into two categories: universities with an explicit evolutionary track, and universities where you work under a specific evolutionary mentor within a broader psychology program. Formal Doctoral Tracks (Ph.D.)A few prominent institutions offer specialized doctoral tracks or concentrations explicitly dedicated to human evolution and behavior:University of Texas at Austin (Ph.D. in Evolutionary Psychology): Managed within the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:26 AM
1

This isn't personal at all. Your argument is just terrible. Its a research specification 😂 Anyone announcing they were RP would be institutionally selected against at the graduate level,
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:18 AM
1

And yet even with anonymity not a single RP claims a degree from Evo psychology You would just immediately demand to see evidence if they did. Why would they make such a shitty argument and put themselves in a situation where they have to doxx themselves to someone like you? 🤡 I love how you just tacitly admitted that admitting to being RP would be career suicide. (Which is why you really want the "evidence") But wait I thought Evolutionary Psychology was pseudo science? Meanwhile after 5 second…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:04 AM
2

No you are doing this to the wife. You are saying she is not faithful. You are an insecure man and you family will suffer for it. I just gave you multiple reasons besides infidelity. Literally nothing is lost by making paternity tests mandatory. Its just an argument from ego. You don't care that there are men being lied to or that children might be endangered because their medical histories are wrong...you specifically don't like it because it gives men certainty over their parentage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:03 AM
1

No one credible says it is " the holistic medicine of psychology" Wow...your reading comprehension must be shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:00 AM
1

They just don’t exists Prove it. You have this omniscient knowledge about all our degrees right? What is my degree in? Prove it Nostradamus. Show me your "real" scientific methods you learned from your half-baked podcast.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:58 AM
1

I also haven’t read “flat earther” books either Totally irrelevant to our conversation. Anymore irrelevant nonsense you want to cite as "evidence?" Literally posted a longitudinal study from a major European university dated to 2026... Maybe there's a podcast on science podcasts you can link? 😂 "B-b-but where are the redpillers with evo psych degrees?" Literally everyone on here is anonymous...🥸
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:55 AM
1

They still don’t have them. Shows how useless it really is. "None of these anonymous reddit or will make shitty arguments about degrees online, so I can trick them into doxxing themselves!" Womp womp
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:52 AM
1

It’s already been stated. That’s why you got triggered. Quote it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:51 AM
1

What was the last behavioral psychology book you've read? How is it pseudoscience? Did your little podcast tell you it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:50 AM
1

And yet even those anonymous accounts won’t even talk about Evo psychology degrees they have. You want them to be the strawmen in your head so bad. Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:48 AM
1

is the holistic medicine of psychology. Literally no one credible says this. There are evidentiary issues sure, but I have never heard a credible behavioral psychologist discard it outright.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:48 AM
2

We can turn this around immediately. It is why relationships end because what you are doing to the women. You are saying you do not believe she was faithful. I asked my husband if he would do it and he said he would not. He knew he could trust me. People literally take home the wrong baby all the time, and there are major developmental disorders that can only be spotted with genetic testing. You're literally putting the baby's livelihood and husband's peace of mind as subordinate to the wife's e…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:46 AM
1

What a way to lose. Lose what bro? You havent even read the book I was talking about 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:43 AM
1

You don’t get to move the goalposts and then demand. What goalposts did I move, you just spent 30 comments whining about "T-they don't have any d-degrees!" Also WTF is DARVO? Sounds like woke intersectional garbage. Acronyms are stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:42 AM
1

The reality is what it is. You just refuse to acknowledge the truth. Which is what? Can't wait to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:40 AM
1

Oh look more DARVO. How does it feel to know the pathetic RP manipulation tactics don’t work? "Manipulation tactics" Be sure to stock up on tinfoil.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:39 AM
1

Women deserve the right to vote. Only thing I hate is unaccountable people. Citation needed. They have done nothing to earn it, and it genuinely seems like they think hating men is a civic virtue. Biggest holders of consumer debt, not even adding to the tax base for their bloated entitlement programs, and not part of selective service for how many years? Consistently voting based on vibes, wholly unaccountable even for the mistakes they make in their own lives. Demanding special treatment becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:32 AM
1

Chiropractors have updated their papers- that must make them real medical doctors!” How many more bad analogies do you have in you? Still waiting for those links bro. Need me to send you a video on how to use google?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:28 AM
1

You want to know more about Psychology and science? I’m sure Only the "right" science though, on the podcasts you watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:27 AM
1

Still waiting on those links bro 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:26 AM
1

This stared because you got triggered and used Evo-psyc to try and sound academic. I do this for fun bruh, and because you have no real arguments other than your feelings and the "real" science in your head. I did was point out that both sciences sit next to each other outside real academia. Just dropped a longitudinal twin study from a real university for 2026, thought it was irrekevant because you never read a sentence of Pinker. Even critics of the Bible and Duanetics know to read the primary…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:23 AM
1

Me (podcast afficionado): this is what real scientists and psychologists say about the field Podcast afficionado: Zero credibility established, expects me to know every RPiller alive like I am a hive mind, hasn't read a page of Pinker, but knows he's BS because Rollo likes him or something. You: you must be ideologically opposed! Bruh literally was throwing a book away because it might lead to harmful stereotypes if you read it wrong 💀. And me again: my opinion is irrelevant. "B-but I know what …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:16 AM
1

Look more DARVO, to deflect from the fact that reality exists and 20 years with zero actual degrees. Bruh the only public redpillers I know are getting cyberstalked by people like you... Most of us are anonymous bro 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:11 AM
1

Funny how they parallel "The strawmen in my head are so obvious! Why can't they see that!" Bro literally started all of this by whining about harmful stereotypes...as if that's evidence of anything 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:10 AM
1

And I never said “you” I said any. Anywhere. Ever. After 2 decades. and another divert. You said that evolutionary psychology wasn't a real science, I just pulled a paper from March 2026 bro. Then you were asking for any evolutionary psychology degrees. Now you are asking for a RP with an Evolutionary Psychology degree. .😂 Terrible line of argument...got any more shitty gifs? Half baked youtube videos? Pop science articles? I bet your "real" science sources were the same outlets publishing that …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:08 AM
1

No, I genuinely think you are just ideologically captured and only know about Evolutionary Psychology because of Rollo Tomassi. 💀 (Which is why you just have to discredit it, because the chuds can't win)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:00 AM
1

Meanwhile 20 years and no Evo psychology degrees from any RPs You literally are stalking and character assassinating a guy, why would they share a degree with you? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:57 PM
1

You have been calling me a Scientiologist and Young Earth Creationist.....do you not know how to look up academic research?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:56 PM
1

The longitudinal twin Studies, which Pinker referenced way back in 2002 and have been updated for 2026...because evo psychology is still a real thing for non ideological scientists
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:55 PM
1

Like I said, I never talked about "muh evo psychology degrees" Which step in the scientific method is going into debt for a PhD? I must have missed that class. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:53 PM
1

Come on, tell me more about the "real" science and how you (a nonscientist) can use your little "dowsing rod" to find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:51 PM
1

Just dropped one from 2026 bro, you said it was irrelevant because you didn't do the reading. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:50 PM
1

Once again: my credibility is irrelevant- the academic community says what it says regardless of me. At this point I am questioning if you have ever read a primary source.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:49 PM
1

Why do I have proof? Because that’s how you prove things The proof is the "real" academia voices in your head right? Because you haven't dropped a single link to a real article.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:48 PM
1

Oh the "real" acdaemia huh? Do you hear this "real" academia talking in your head alot? What do the voices say? Are they made of hay? I thought the real academia was all of the intersectional friends we made along the way?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:45 PM
1

Contentless rhetoric. There goes your credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:44 PM
1

The longitudinal twin studies are important for OUR purposes because its evidence that behavior can be genetically encoded, which goes against the Blank Slate view, the Mind Body Dualist View, etc. Its important because social constructivists who are fixated on brain dead woke ideology, have their conceptions of human nature predicated upon this. That's where all these social conditioning anti-misogyny programs come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:43 PM
1

“I can cite studies” Means nothing Just admit you are ideologically captured. Can't even quote a sentence from Steven Pinker but knows its all bullshit. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:40 PM
1

Why don’t ANY RPs have Evo-degrees IDK, Why do you have a timeline graphic of Rollo Tomassi's life? I'll be sure to ask about their degrees at the next quarterly meeting 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:37 PM
1

You've literally never read a word of Pinker...💀 This is Evolutionary Psychology bro...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:35 PM
1

Womp womp, just dropped two longitudinal twin studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:34 PM
1

Modern Twin Research and Genetics The Lund University Twin Study (2026): Read the official press release from Lund University regarding how innate IQ and genetics strongly predict socioeconomic status, challenging pure environmental determinism. You can also view the scientific breakdown of this research on PsyPost or browse the summary provided by ScienceDaily. https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/new-twin-study-highlights-power-genetics[New twin study highlights the power of genetics](http…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:30 PM
1

Why do I need to have a degree in a theory bro? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:18 PM
2

But a bunch of non Evo-psys quoting it just cause of a grifter, while never getting any degree in the field proves it’s nothing How scientific 🤡 Literally studied Pinker in College as a Blue Pill guy. But you watched a youtube video saying its ALL bullshit 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:14 PM
1

Where are my journal article links bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:12 PM
1

You’re showing me that even YOU cant show a single RP Evo psycho degree When did I promise that? You must be getting hay fever from all those strawmen in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:10 PM
1

"They are fake b/c they won't doxx themselves to a guy stalking rollo tomassi" Where are those journal links bro? You can always tell the "real" scientists by the amount of debt they incur chasing a degree...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:07 PM
1

"The real science" -according to...not a scientist I love these shoddy appeal to authority arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:05 PM
1

I am showing you how to drop a reputable research paper link, you know like with a Boomer who doesn't understand how Gmail works.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:04 PM
1

Where are the Science Journal Links bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:03 PM
1

Still waiting on those Degrees So if I had a degree in Applied Phrenology then you would take me seriously? Oh of course! That's the most important part of the scientific method! The ideological circle jerk!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:02 PM
1

Just read this today: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2400749 Once after proving- if evo psychologically was relevant- RPs would have degrees in it to show off after 20 years. That's my favorite part of the scientific method, getting a random ass diploma, showing its legit 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 11:00 PM
2

How was I able to listen to and read what real scientists and psychologists showed and said and presented and be able to form an opinion?! All you are linking are half-baked youtube videos and pop science sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:57 PM
1

You act as if there is zero science in evol psychology...😂 I get it, you like repping the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You are acting like an atheist trying to criticize Christians by calling out Mohammed...at a certain point you need to know the basic details if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:56 PM
1

Link an actual paper, not a half-assed youtube video.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:53 PM
2

Bruh who has never read an evo psychology paper, is somehow super opinionated on evo psychology papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:53 PM
1

So guys are lazy, they're not talking to women, Women are genuinely lazy in courtship, they whine about putting on makeup, we have single mom's out here whining that the guy on their first date isn't buying food for her kids, her friends, or paying for childcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:51 PM
2

Women usually keep touching your arm, smiling excessively, following you around, my ex was literally posing like a cat in heat.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:48 PM
1

Oh wow, imagine my shock, admitting these guys want women super horny and obsessed. Translation: The ideal woman is bone dry and dismissive. 💀 Neither are the other women! Is this hypothetical girl bisexual now, or are we pretending these 4/10 wall flowers are expending effort?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:46 PM
1

Also, it begs the question where are you meeting women? Right, because its just not the right venue....🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:44 PM
1

If everywhere smells like shit, check your shoe Truth is predicated upon objective material facts, not consensus. You wait around for women to talk to you guys, which is not what most men do. Stats say you are wrong, lived experience says you are wrong, and for most guys, you are just validating someone who is going to talk down to you. Most guys don’t wait around for a woman to talk to them. Learn some accountability. First step of accountability, is being accountable for your own time, anyone …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:43 PM
1

The theme of a lack of accountability is so constant in this post. The common denominator is never the guy? Never? Let's say a girl is at the dance with a guy, and while he's not perfect, he's trying to learn all the steps... meanwhile she is acting like a 4 year old and dragging her feet all over the floor. Is the messed up dance the guy's fault, or is it the chick doing a geriatric senator impression? Accountability applies to both, but one party was more egregious than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:39 PM
2

So according to you guys, men are lazy as hell. Bruh. All the PSAs on harassment...did you not get the memo sis? Its 2026. Saying hello is creepy, smiling is creepy, waving is creepy, holding the door is creepy...existing is creepy. We got the memo. fake, fickle, immortal women Immortal women? This is real life, not a shitty Ann Rice Novel.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:33 PM
1

Human beings are social animals that openly communicate and can TELL YOU what’s attractive to them. Can they? What does the data actually show? Bruh, imagine being this opinionated on people you've never read. What's the blank slate theory? Come on this one is easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:10 PM
1

"Gynocentrist" I feel like unironically Terrible grammar. I feel a lot of things too, but feelings are like assholes, everyone has one. What do you actually know? It tells me I am not debating with a person in their right mind and the conversation will go nowhere. Is there a test you do to determine whether someone is in their right mind? Let me guess, its whether they agree with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:07 PM
1

Me: drops receipts from actual scientists ...you haven't even attempted to read a single Evo Psychologist have you? As for your "scientists" 🤡 Bruh Remember when you were acting like you were informed on this stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:04 PM
1

No, I called out what you were trying and called it out Do you make your strawmen out of ragweed or alfalfa? A single paragraph from a evo psychology paper. Five whole sentences. I am making it so easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:01 PM
–

I can give the mods anything I need to substantiate my family, service and education. You should try to be better than yourself before you contrast yourself to those who achieved goals already I don't know you from eve lady, its interesting you mentioned the mods, because you definitely were ad homming out of the gate...and I have seen zero action from them at all...are you friends with them or something? The emotionally laden vitriol you have been spewing is not helping your credibility with me…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:59 PM
1

No, we aren’t using the manipulation tactic of “presenting to me all your evidence so I can cherry pick and nit pick as a means of deflection”. I was literally asking for a single claim...how about a single paper that you have personally read, pick it apart. Hell, have an AI do it if you can't do the reading. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:49 PM
1

And where was i ever a scientist?! You felt qualified enough to opine on the credibility on Evo Psychology with two shoddy YouTube Videos and a Pop Science Article. Yes its creepy that you have a timeline and watch him in a dead platform.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:47 PM
1

Y'all are literally a meme in human form it's so embarrassing. Contentless rhetoric. Now tell me how "harmful" their rhetoric is. I am trying to fill out my bingo card on emotionally incontinent hot-takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:45 PM
1

Stalking? Dudes stuck on Rumble getting almost no views. Bro, even I don't watch him on Rumble...you are Obssessed. No ones stalking him. He’s been exposed as a fraud and abandoned by everyone in TRP except Bi-ron gains Remember when you were larping as a scientist?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:43 PM
1

Sure you do- just like religious people stand by the Bible to say the earth is 6 thousand years old. I hope your Strawmen are ethically sourced... Still doesn’t make it anything other than confirmation bias pretending to be intelligence. Prove evolution in a lab, prove non avian therapod pack hunting in a lab...comparative behavior is helpful. Human beings are just neurotic apes with a lot of so-called rational behaviors determined by evolutionary instincts... I have a feeling that you are close…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:41 PM
1

Your specialty is stalking whoever Rollo is? 💀 I am not apologizing because I wasn't aware I did anything wrong? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:37 PM
1

Yes, and that needs to be addressed more, but what I can’t stand is Western men pointing the finger at those men, as if they have no faults whatsoever of their own. And Is it that, or do you hold some "victimhood" demographics to be above criticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:35 PM
1

I am a historian, Mass Immigration destroys civilizations...I am not complaining about migrants as a class, I am talking about numbers that cannot be assimilated, lead to tensions, and destroys local economies and infrastructures. Didn't work out for the Native Americans, and it won't work out for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:34 PM
1

By that definition all specialists are guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:29 PM
2

Name one claim. I understand the falsifiability argument, but there is a lot of crossover with primatology that I found helpful Just admit that you don't like it for emotional or ideological reasons, you already invoked harmful stereotypes which has nothing to do with the validity of their science.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:29 PM
1

I just think they are funny choices. I think its fucked up that gynocentrists get to dominate all of these spaces, whereas they only have a shitty quarantined subreddit. You laughing it off, just shows how myopic your "side" is. TRP genuinely helped me, and its a far better predictor of human behavior (women specifically) than anything else out here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:25 PM
1

So far i see red pillers blaming women for: What have you actually read?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:17 PM
1

Yeah they've all just infiltrated the psychology of sex sub 🤣🤣 Such a sober and mature reaction...celebrating censorship doesn't actually help the other side's credibility does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:16 PM
0

Wow...you really seem hung up on Rollo...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:14 PM
2

Evolutionary psychology is criticized because it relies on untestable hypotheses, oversimplifies complex social behaviors, and can be used to justify harmful social biases Sound more like Woke Feminist Projection to me bub. Truth is based on reality, not building consensus amongst the emotionally incontinent & ideologically captured hedonists. How about YOU attack it in your own words?...which specific claim do you take issue with. Can be any one of them. Evol Psychology is at least as accurate …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:12 PM
1

Related to "not seeing the obvious" about men supposedly "hating" women: The Dunning-Kruger effect is a mental shortcut where people with low skill or small knowledge in an area think they are much better than they actually are. It means people lack the self-awareness to see their own mistakes. The idea was named after psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999. Regarding why (I suspect) TRP bothers you so much: Pinker notes that people cling to the Blank Slate out of fear, assuming t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:58 PM
2

Yeah. That’s a highly dubious and very questionable field. Your source: TrUsT Me BrO In other words it’s like trying to say you understand modern medicine because you read a book a chiropractor wrote. Its a better model for forecasting & explaining human behavior than anything the social constructivists are defecating out. BTW: the only reason RP reference evo-psychotic is because Rollo plagiarized his first book from a Evo Psychologist. That's nice, hardly a recrimination of his ideas though. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:52 PM
1

the simplest explanation with the fewest assumptions is usually best. I know what Occam's Razor is. It presumes your operating from a basis of knowledge above abject ignorance, also the operative word is "usually." Pretty sure I read similar "justifications" in Ecclesiastical case law trying to prop up the geocentric model of the solar system. I stand by the referenced Evolutionary Psychological models.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:46 PM
1

You think that you're smart because you can read and memorise shoot? Think again. Again, is Shoot slang or...? Once you start actually using your intellect - by questioning authority and intellectual concepts - you'll know what I mean. I've actually created several theories of my own...y'all still don't agree 😂 (b/c feelings) I did tell you from the very beginning that I did not really want to engage with you. No one made you join a debate subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:41 PM
1

Okay. Glad we agree. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:39 PM
2

That's not what Occam's Razor means...or maybe you're trying to invoke it like a memey spell? 😂 Regarding the following "enlightened centrist" take: Every extremest group looks for the most desperate which is why so many sexless losers are also strangely right wing political. My rebuttal, taken from Pinker: Pinker notes that people cling to the Blank Slate out of fear, assuming that admitting biological differences will justify racism, sexism, or social inequality. He counters this by stating th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:37 PM
1

The Truth is Not Predicated Upon Emotional Convenience. The most important aspect of interacting with women is avoiding social constructivist Dogma that has consistently failed to accurately capture or forecast human behavior. This was a must read for me: In his 2002 book, "The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature," cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker argues that the Blank Slate theory is completely false because modern science proves that human behavior, intelligence, and personality…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:33 PM
2

Regarding libslop: Social constructivism is a learning theory that states human development and knowledge are created through social interaction and cultural context. It argues that people do not find pre-existing truth, but rather construct it together by interacting with each other and their environment. Regarding why the least read are the most opinionated: The Dunning-Kruger effect is a mental shortcut where people with low skill or small knowledge in an area think they are much better than …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:30 PM
2

Wrong, there's actual scientific theory behind it. Reading Steven Pinker's The Blank Slate, really fleshed out TRP for me: In his 2002 book, "The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature," cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker argues that the Blank Slate theory is completely false because modern science proves that human behavior, intelligence, and personality are heavily shaped by evolutionary biology and genetics.Pinker asserts that denying the existence of an innate human nature is not o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:27 PM
2

Basic animal biology also drives their choices Reading The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker really fleshed out TRP for me (not that he's RP) In his 2002 book, "The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature," cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker argues that the Blank Slate theory is completely false because modern science proves that human behavior, intelligence, and personality are heavily shaped by evolutionary biology and genetics.Pinker asserts that denying the existence of an innate human n…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:24 PM
1

I think more people should read Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate, really helped flesh out aspects of TRP for me. (Not that he identifies as RP)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:22 PM
0

?? I know at least one feminist.. and she doesn't hate men. or want a gender war... that sounds ridiculous Well how many feminists do you supposedly know? How do you know she doesn't hate men? How do you know she doesn't want a gender war? Does it sound ridiculous, or does it feel ridiculous?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:20 PM
1

It worked for me? Idk. Skill issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:17 PM
1

Theories that have diddly squat to do with reality are just a waste of brain space! You mean like Feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:11 PM
1

Actual real life experience on the ground: Send a swab of dog saliva to a lab and tell them that it's human saliva. Guess what, they will come back to you confirming that it's human saliva! (they will even have the audacity to tell you what "kind" of human the saliva is from!!!! Theories that have diddly squat to do with reality are just a waste of brain space! You have been sold a lie (one of veeeeery many)! What are you doing swabbing a dog's mouth? Have you taken the dog pill? 🤢 What does tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:08 PM
1

"Intellectual shoot" 💀 What? Whereas I am more than capable (IQ wise) to understand shoot, I am still totally unwilling to engage... Related: The Dunning-Kruger effect is a mental shortcut where people with low skill or small knowledge in an area think they are much better than they actually are. It means people lack the self-awareness to see their own mistakes. The idea was named after psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999. Thanks for restoring my confidence in the education sys…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 07:34 PM
0

You know, it turns out establishing paternity is crucial for important things like Medical History...who knew? Maybe we shouldn't prioritize the conveniences of hedonistic women over the livelihoods of our children?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 07:21 PM
–

Oh honey, if I was a Mark ass who believed that crap, I’d also have your unearned confidence but happily, I have media literacy and wisdom from experience and education. You can’t relate Contentless Rhetoric. WTF is a Mark ass? You're right, I can't relate 💀. Dare I ask what "Media Literacy" is to you? By all means, feel free to expound upon your voluminous wisdom and academic accolades. I do genuinely offer my condolences to your son though. (If he exists). On Topic: I maintain what I have been…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 07:10 PM
1

If you can't put it in plain english then you might not have understood it yourself yet... Contentless Rhetoric. You commented "yes we do" to their quote about Women wanting to change Men. Your inability to research or look up simple poli sci concepts is not my problem. (Even AI is too much? 💀) (Also since Evolutionary Psychology is foundational to TRP, maybe you should go read the Wikipedia article on "The Blank Slate" by Steven Pinker?) I mean come on, if I can stomache Friedan's "The Feminine…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 06:57 PM
1

K. Guess there's no point in further reading and engagement! ✌🏾 Contentless rhetoric. Your failure to address my points is noted. Glad we established you are debating in bad faith. Single mothers should be evaluated for contributory negligence, when the partners they are selecting have established a clear pattern of sexually abusing children. After a certain point you need to go after who is letting the pedos in the house. "Choosing Better" absolutely matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 06:38 PM
1

Hope that helps. To quote you "I don't care." We both know you are motivated by narrative over accuracy. Far fewer than the minors sexually abused by cousins, fathers, brothers, and uncles. I know you don't care about that though. I actually do care, but I doubt the proportional accuracy of your assertion. Again, even in these cases, women are the primary gatekeepers of access to the children (courtesy of things like the 'tender years doctrine.') You also failed to refute my single mothers' clai…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 06:26 PM
1

Since this is all about quoting accuracy, wtf is "quixotic"? Your response was about quoting accuracy (irrelevant - you were agreeing with the quoted intent) Mine was not. What was quixotic was the social constructionivist desire - "we want men to change." What you are complaining about is the result of evolutionarily determined behaviors. I think the Blank Slate Theory about Human Nature is inherently flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 06:06 PM
1

Look at false rape accusations as an issue if you disagree I had a front row seat to the UVA Rolling Stones debacle. Reputation construction/destruction is a mixed bag, especially when so much more pressure is placed on building consensus over situational accuracy. The point I was making was about gynocentrism's institutional locus of control.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:59 PM
1

By women you mean? Maybe It's not all their fault, my current cohort of female peers are arguably victims of mass social engineering programs
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:56 PM
1

There was no question mark. Yes I saw the quotations. To paraphrase, I was critiquing the policy position around seeking a goal like "we want men to change." It seems quixotic at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:52 PM
–

Oh my gods, it used immigration "It" used? Being against mass migration doesnt mean I hate immigrants anymore than being against mass flooding means I am anti-water.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:47 PM
1

Especially since I said the average person experiences 3-4. "Average person" is doing heavy lifting. I wish I could see the original comment in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:44 PM
2

If this is a serious relationship and this is what you think? If I was the partner I would leave By all means leave, but if this is your go to response for such a low cost test to give someone you supposedly "love" permanent peace of mind, then I question the authenticity of your commitment to the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:38 PM
1

Is men self-reporting taken seriously? Is female deception adequately punished? Female Credibility was destroyed for ephemeral gains and tactical convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:33 PM
1

So someone crafted a hoax in Omaha, NE that got men arrested and women are responsible? Disengenuous framing. The attention is always upon female victims over male victims. Remember that media coverage of boko haram abducting those school girls few years back? None of the coverage I saw bothered to mention that all of the boy peers were killed. A question: where were you when I was a child and saw an alcoholic husband throw shoes at his children? What about the wife's bruises? Yet there were no …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:27 PM
1

The rate and occurrence of "R" per capita is what's informative when looking at demographic trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:13 PM
1

But it is counterproductive Building consensus is necessarily subordinate to telling the truth. Memento mori, feelings are ephemeral, death is permanent. There is nothing more dangerous to a civilization than a "conveniently" obscured truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:11 PM
0

Sounds like your post needs a rewrite then. It’s not a “women lie” it’s “everyone lies”. Or you need to reread his posts. It's the pattern of female deception and the suspected motives behind it that are actually pertinent (assuming this was a good faith debate).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:08 PM
0

You got triggered Most people (men and women) display aggression when you are seen to disengenuously misrepresent their actual perspectives and beluefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:05 PM
0

Your men’s group actively hates women. Women’s Projection. I arrived to this space seeking to understand an observed pattern of female behavior that was out of sync with stated preferences and beliefs. Most men on my "side" of the argument are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:03 PM
1

The royal "we" is a rhetorical redflag from a policy POV. It is indicative of an inorganic authoritarian approach that requires considerable effort to maintain and enforce upon a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 05:00 PM
2

The most bad faith aspect about your "position," is your disdain for male lived experience. Your "side's" disdain for anecdotal evidence is not even a standard you can adhere to yourselves IRL. The truth of a claim is most often corroborated through observed patterns in the world. Is it 100% accurate all the time? No, we all have blindspots, and confounding variables do exist. But a discerning person can probably draw plausible inferences regarding causality 75% to 80% of the time imho. Especial…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:53 PM
1

A car accident is not necessarily a car fatality. You're conflating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:44 PM
1

The most horrifying thing about this person's insane takes is that some people have actually upvoted them wtf O.o' Consensus has less value than truth. Can you articulate what actually "upsets" you? Or is this purely performative? I am pretty straightforward. Ideology is subjective. Reality is objective. What we prefer does not inform what actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:41 PM
1

Obviously it hasn't ended in marriage yet, but, luck. You do not understand how the sausage is made. They are squeezing the blood out of their remaining user base. It's a pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 03:27 AM
0

You are funny. Full of yourself and your injuries and you have joined the women are the ones to scapegoat school of thought. It is an old school, used primarily by a certain kind of man and it's been around since we have recorded history. I spent a lot of time talking to the graduates of it in the 60s and 70s. You are nothing new. 60s and 70s, so you were party to the inciting demographic. What would you say your biggest Feminist accomplishments are? Destroying the concept of a single income hou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 03:14 AM
1

Related: How Female Power Led To The Downfall Of The West: https://youtu.be/bOeaRd5Izoc?is=IM7yfVc-w1RmlslS Alexander Grace goes into the discrepancies between Male and Female views about rules and consequential suffering. Which I largely agree with. (See the time stamps on compassion below). This video by Alexander Grace argues that the decline of Western institutions is rooted in the increased influence of feminine psychology and values over public life. The speaker suggests that the tradition…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 03:06 AM
0

Once again, please explain whose livelihoods specifically you are subsidizing and how women are not also subsidizing their livelihoods considering that most women also have jobs? Lion's share of taxable income comes from male taxpayers to pay for fraudulent women dominated social entitlement programs. Most federal grants cater towards minorities and women. Most scholarships cater to minorities and women. Most welfare caters ghe minorities and women. Men get no safety net socially or financially.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:48 AM
1

An algorithm just connects folks, they're still strangers who have to talk and meet up and date. Do your homework, the algorithms have been tweaked to keep people coming back to the app. This is common knowledge 2018 might be before the changes, 2023? Maybe... Besides men inherently have a higher threshold to meet when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:35 AM
4

I don't give a damn what you can attest to. Not one bit. But apparently you give a damn about me knowing you don't give a damn 😂 Thanks for yet another useless contribution. Have a sticker. Edit: you start by condescending, and now are playing the victim. 🙄 Learn to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:32 AM
1

So any behaviour is okay as long as you believe you are the abused one? No. But calling out moronic bullshit leading to societal collapse is conflated as "abuse." Also if I wanted to start a company that explicitly only hired men I would be jammed up under the 1967 civil rights act in minutes. The inverse is not true for women. Men used to have legitimate "woman-free" third spaces, but all of these were seen as "discriminatory" and systematically destroyed. The inverse is not true for women. Hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:27 AM
1

Nothing that comes from an algorithm is organic. Sure luck is involved, but when did this happen? The algorithms were most likely changed since then to promote short term dating and keep users coming back.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:04 AM
1

I wasnt talk about your friend, dont know who he is, so you're not gonna use him to guilt trip me. Moving on. He is not anecdotal, he was part of an observable trend, so no, you don't get to move past it (like most worthless people tend to do with the male suicide rate). Young men are being wrung out to dry, we are constantly condescended to, and are unable to advocate for ourselves. All these groups trying to diagnose what's wrong with us, never have any young men on their panels. Young men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:59 AM
1

So you're good with it? Let's change the subject and put it on you. You do not have to think I do anything wrong, it is your fault. No idea what you're trying to say here, but gynocentrism is over-represented on both sides of the aisle and is baked into all HR and Admissions offices. It is ubiquitous. There is no place for young men to organize that isn't censored or destroyed, there is no political party that takes the interest of young men seriously. We are the whipping boys for every social i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:51 AM
1

I don't think any algorithms could account for if two people actually hit it off or not is what I'm gesturing at. They literally tweak the algorithm to promote short term relationships that keep you coming back.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:47 AM
-1

I am anti-woke because I am anti-suicidal empathy. If you keep letting rapists back out on the streets because of their demographic, you are promoting racism, not preventing it. I am tired of being punished for the behavior of men who have no business being in the country or walking on the street. I think its disgusting to ask men to subsidize the livelihoods of people that hate them and wouldn't lift a finger to help if they were in trouble. I voted for Trump because I genuinely believed that v…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:45 AM
1

It's not fair that you hate on guys for being awful people. It's oppressive that people's bad actions have consequences!. My friend was a good guy, one month I was asked to be his best man (he was marrying a woman who made my skin crawl), a few months later he was dead. To a cohort of solipsistic idiots, anything that challenges their myopic worldview is "bad." A man who thinks consequences makes him a victim is a man who's never going to be around women who value accountability. Name one time y…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:37 AM
1

I was referring to American Universities being given rape stats on par with the Congo. Also, I definitely am not happy with anything going on in the Middle East. My ex was an American that lived in Saudi (well Bahrain actually), I have worked at a Middle Eastern Country's embassy, and lets just say I have been tearing apart the Iranian War narrative since it started...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:31 AM
1

You are literally victim blaming men for being treated like pariahs. 😂 If you want to know what a hypocrite looks like, look in the mirror. You are genuinely clueless about the male experience, and the fact that you feel bold enough to lecture men on anything is obscene I have friends that killed themselves after having their lives destroyed by unaccountable women. These same women were catered to and comforted as if they were the victims and it genuinely disgusts me to this day. open minded to …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:23 AM
3

So you want women overwhelmed with lust and think with their vaginas. So horny slutty bimbos. I won't speak for other men, but I want someone I can trust more than anything else. I have been with "mids," and genuinely have not been bothered by it. The problem is that most modern women have no morals, overtly eschew personal accountability, and I genuinely cannot bring myself to trust them. Keep denigrating men though, you clearly have no grasp on what our side of the issue is like. Also the wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:11 AM
1

I can't copy paste from your OP for some reason. Anyways I don't think you are identifying "conservative" men correctly. As a man who values faith, but is not of ignorant of secular trends, the only reason I would consider sleeping with a girl is if I don't trust the enforcement mechanism behind marriage anymore. Because at least you'd increase the likelihood of pair-bonding. I have been around enough women to know, that a lot of them can't be trusted to not act like a liberal woman. Pearl Davis…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:06 AM
–

Most people hate bigots and aren't nice to bigots. I am saying you qualify as a bigot 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:59 AM
1

I am saying that the personality you've demonstrated thus far is the opposite of attractive. I would actively be put off by you IRL. Brett Cooper is another example of a genuinely intolerable nominally "conservative" woman. Also the point I made was about the Sarah Stock archetype being the norm for conservative relationships. I got SO much flack when she got engaged and said the way she was posting was a red flag, too many SIMPs in the church. Women go to church to socialize, men go to pray tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:57 AM
4

Projection. That's why men dont do well on a=dating apps. They want to rely on looks and nothing else. Being hot with a criminal record is enough to get women to message you. There are serial killers who get more pussy inside prison than before they were inside it. That's the patten in this sub, guys wanting stupid fickle horny women. Bimbos. That's the pattern IRL, I don't care about fucking as much as loyalty. And as much as you decry the physical side, the positive correlation between fucking…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:52 AM
1

What I have said in my post. I made a whole post about the issue. I read it, I simply maintain that you lack the epistemic grounding to make the assertions you are making. So humor me, what "qualifies" as realistic to you? A 5/10 guy dating 3/10 woman? How chopped are we talking? As for personality, most modern women don't have one. Consuming products and watching trash TV shows is not a personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:49 AM
–

THEY DOTN WANT conservative women. Hey Ms. Personality, do you know what Sarah Stock is? What if I were to tell you that what she did is the norm?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:45 AM
3

Okay? That didn't change a thing I said. So you're trying to appeal to superficial women? Everyone who uses a dating app is being superficial, women don't even think when they swipe 😂 Ergo, the picture is the important part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:42 AM
1

That which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You lack the credibility for me to take your dismissal seriously. I stand by what I said. Your basis for claiming that academia kowtows to the gynocentric whims of feminists is Charlie Kirk's grift organization's tax filings. You clearly didn't properly read my original post💀. Could you imagine me wasting my time linking you sources you wouldn't even read? Also Charlie (RIP) was a huuuuge simp and gynocentrist. Womp womp…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:36 AM
3

Be realistic and stop being stupid. Realistic in relation to what? You are completely unhinged with anything to do with the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:33 AM
7

When you have nothing else to offer. The first thing you see on a dating profile is the picture so....you're objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:32 AM
1

These men tend to hold the views they do because they are low on traits like empathy and high on traits like narcissism. Or high on Empathy for the people you despise. They are bitter about women not wanting to date them and so construct ideologies that theoretically punish women. Or we don't want to be forced to subsidize people who vote against our interests, conflate degrading us with advancement, or are overtly incapable of empathizing with us. I would argue that they’re non-religious conser…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:30 AM
2

And they're most likely religious and serious about commitment. Compared to what? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:26 AM
1

Adults with normal IQ: Dont put your hand on the hot stove. Guys, this same chick once said she did well on dating apps because of her personality. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:24 AM
2

I literally am in the demographic, and you've got it backwards, conservative women are feminists doing the speed limit. Sarah Stock is the norm, not the exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:23 AM
1

Nope, that's not how debate works. The burden of proof is on you. My point stands then. Thanks for confirming you were bad faith. Toodles. I guess actually being party to Federal Conteacting and Grant Writing doesn't count for anything with you? 💀 Sorry, Turning Point USA? The Charlie Kirk grift? Yup, its more of a grift now. You should see some of the stuff people have been digging up on their tax filings. The argument still applies, its a similar set up. I think a lot of nonprofits and ngos ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:20 AM
–

Imagine being less liked than TRUMP and thinking everyone else is the problem. 100 dollars says you've never spent a day doing manual labor on a farm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:16 AM
1

I am going to go out on a limb and say you've never been to Alaska.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:15 AM
–

Sounds like living in the ghetto. Most people arent ghetto. Factoring in global incomes, you're grossly inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:13 AM
–

I 100% want to see this chick's dating profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:11 AM
1

By the way its "Quasimodo," ms. "I Have A Personality." 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:09 AM
1

The Alexander Grace one is ancient. He even said it wouldn't work half as well today. 💀 The worst part about debating women like this is that they never admit when they get things wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:08 AM
-1

It can be addressed with common sense economic policy and increased immigration. Mass migration yields major social upheaval and civil wars historically. Edit: emotionally downvoting me doesn't make you right sis 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:04 AM
2

Again, do it yourself. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:03 AM
1

Guys, I found the original thread she pulled this old ass video from: https://preview.redd.it/mdo3u200d9gh1.jpeg?width=709&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd8a9efcd5dd660de19fc1853a2405b425d44789
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:03 AM
–

Because I give good first impressions, so people like to get to know me more. That's cap.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:00 AM
1

Birthrate decline is more than just abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:59 PM
1

They've got theses things called parks. Ladies love a picnic basket. A woman would make a thread specifically for mocking the man for doing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:57 PM
1

I think people don't account for bad luck enough with online dating. It's not not exactly luck if you're paying to not be fucked with by the algorithm.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:56 PM
1

If you feel that uncomfortable about men being held accountable, THAT'S ON YOU. Name one time you've seen a woman being held accountable for something.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:54 PM
1

You guys love to pretend to be oppressed and victimized Tell me more about our "rape culture," "man-spreading" and "gender pay gap." They literally discriminate in terms of race and gender ALL the time. I have literally seen homeless men lose assistance because they were the wrong race/gender. HR and Admissions explicitly discriminates on the basis of race and gender, look at those blind studies that were referenced in that Yale Lawsuit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:53 PM
–

Gene pool too 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:51 PM
2

Well, I dont tolerate bigotry, so they dont really end up in my dating pool for long. I could make a highlight reel of every time you've been Misandrist on this sub. My friends love it when I dont tolerate bigotry. What kind of "friends?" Would any of them help you move? Help you fight off a rabid dog? Go looking for you if you went missing in the woods? Tell you if they saw someone cheating on you? Tell you something you didn't want to hear?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:49 PM
2

…..should men try focusing more on personality and compatibility? NAH! What exactly counts as a "personality" to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:46 PM
2

You guys are obsessed with looks and that's the problem. If the broad looks like she is about to lose a foot to diabetes and has to pay for two seats on the airplane, then maybe we shouldn't settle doe someone who will pass on their bad habits and shitty genes to our children? Besides not every guy is cut out for pushing into a bean bag chair every night.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:45 PM
2

Most of you can't afford to be that shallow. Can you? You talk big for a faceless redditor. Online dating is cringe, if you are not dating to get your dick wet, its not very good at setting up long term relationships. What exactly qualifies as "substance" to you? What kind of hobbies do you have that makes you feel qualified to opine on what is worthwhile?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:42 PM
1

If this is the type of attitude a guy brings on their dates, it’s no wonder they’re not doing well with women. An observation of an obvious blindspot, is not an attitude. Lmao 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:38 PM
2

Naive take. AI is not genuine intelligence yet. And everything requires maintenance. Edit: can't respond normally because of bad faith moderation, but I agree with you 👇
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:57 PM
2

We all are going to get squeezed so bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:56 PM
2

your audience would be people that agree birth rate is problem. and you tell them you dont want to donate sperm because of bad behaviour. women dont want to date, fuck get pregnant by men for all there reasons. so sounds like a lot of unreasonable people then. Undecided people in the audience. Again this is barely English.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:55 PM
3

Not taxing the first million dollars you make would be huge
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:53 PM
-2

Also more research to reduce the pain and lasting damage from birth (including body changes) I am aware of a lot of comorbidities that come with child birth...it doesn't have to be lethal to be life changing. Then we better start actually looking into options to make motherhood more appealing. We could do mass deportations to lower the strain on social welfare programs, but I doubt your side has the stones for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:52 PM
3

then you doing what you are not happy about. this is why i dont say who is unreasonable. That is not English. There is more to life than f□cking. I am doing a lot more than posting on Reddit. The point of debate is not to win over your opponent its to reach out to the audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:46 PM
2

No, I am good on that. I don't reward bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:43 PM
2

i think it silly men think it will make women want to date them. thats the reason for my post. I don't think any of us are looking to date any of the people here...💀 Telling the truth is more important than dating anyone, and a civilization ending threat is worth being candid about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:40 PM
-2

The ones trivializing a cratering birth rate as if it won't effect them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:30 PM
1

The birth rate argument is huge for showing how unreasonable their side is. The Soviet Union outlawed abortion because they realized their birth rate was too low. Birth rate decline begets civilization decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:13 PM
1

Yo mods, I think they blocked me instead of trying to argue back. https://preview.redd.it/jotdjukks8gh1.jpeg?width=901&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=16e97f4e0d63a4fcca4759482046ea36dc1f032e
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:08 PM
1

You also don’t need to censor “blood” and “suicide”. We aren’t on tik tok. Reddit has so many bots moderating everything. Its arguably worse when it comes to overzealous censorship. But automod is arguably better than the Mod Team they have operating now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:05 PM
2

Most men dont want to be the type of person agreeing with sex offenders, so there's nothing much to say. There was a prominent Nazi Party Official who pioneered some animal rights legislation. So by your "logic," does everyone who agrees that animal rights exist tacitly condone the Nazi Party? Guilt by association is genuinely an embarrassing line of argument. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:04 PM
2

Do you actually think invoking a bunch of random malfeasants constitutes a valid argument against the concept of contributory negligence? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:01 PM
1

I’m a proud community college dropout making $100k What industry?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:59 PM
1

This sub can demonstrate a lot of men dehumanizing women. Do these so-called "dehumanizing" views have institutional support?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:59 PM
6

That and the dead bodies on the roadways...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:57 PM
2

Next such comment and I'm simply blocking you. Bad move there bud, blocking is punished on this subreddit, just FYI.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:55 PM
1

No, it's not my job to go find evidence for your claims. Or you can find evidence to try and debunk them? 😅 You aren't one of those flaccid "debaters" who say you're wrong because X said so are you? I have no reason to treat you as credible, unless you give me a good faith reason to take you seriously. "Institutional Bias in Academic Research." My criticism is you have not connected your unsupported claims to the OP claim that studies and statistics are not reliable. I am only outlining the plau…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:48 PM
0

I think JustGeminiThings will be left to argue with you because I dont think I'll take this seriously. Pretty sure the Church said the same thing about Galileo at first. Also somebody better call Robin DeAngelo and tell her that Implicit Bias is no longer a real thing. (Never liked her anyway). That has nothing to do with the conversation and it's just an excuse to victim blame. If you look at the history of personal injury cases involving wild animals in national parks, its pretty clear that co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:41 PM
–

For sure, no institution of research is credible, peer reviewed studies are untrue, so what's left? Your personal gnosis? Certainly not any objective material that can be submitted to support your abundance of opinions. Skepticism tempered by falsifiable premises and empirical corroboration. I am glad you are capable of acknowledging my claims, why don't you argue in good faith and try to debunk one of them? Or you can give me a P.O. box where I can send your Family Size Lotion to. I am sure wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:04 PM
1

Re: "In every scenario I have seen thus far" -> You were NEVER ACTUALLY IN THE ROOM when those scenarios happened, so how would you know????? Please do not tell me that you are relying on what that "unaccountable woman" told you.... Being skeptical of women does not mean ignoring everything that has been said. My cousin worked in social services, and I have no reason to doubt what she has confided in me, because I have corroborated it through legal research and academic research. Certain Women c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:53 PM
3

Wrong, and wrong. Irrelevant and unsubstantiated. Let me know if you have anything substantive to say. Everything I have said above I can personally attest to observing IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:49 PM
1

What is it based on besides your own confidently held opinions? Pattern recognition from myself and my peers that has been proven to be so precise that it was able to predict how women were going to act regardless of what they said they were going to do. Feminism is terrible at predicting behavior or sociological responses in men or women. It's literally a self-defeating ideology as is evinced by the plummeting birth rates of every culture that adopts it. Mmhmm. Blah, blah "CNC!" (1) You ever st…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:41 PM
1

Source? Go Google the phrase "Institutional Bias in Academic Research." I have made my claim, its up to you to substantively contest it. If you can't manage that, go order a "Family Size" bottle of lotion so you and your buddies can engage in a "peer-reviewed" circle jerk. Speaking personally, I have direct experience with Federal Grants and Federal Contracting, so I have seen firsthand how these systems develop/are maintained. If that's not sufficient for you, feel free to engage in the nepotis…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:29 PM
3

Wtf is wrong with you! Emotional incontinence is not an argument. Go look up accounts of the social welfare people trying to get children out of abusive households. In every scenario I have seen thus far, there is an unaccountable woman facilitating access to the abusers. (Failing to 'Choose Better'). A statistically significant (if not majority) of domestic sexual abuse towards children starts with a single mother bringing in a strange man into the home.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:12 PM
6

lol so women = feminists? Then that means saying “feminists” has no real meaning and you can just say women then. Overly reductive. I am concerned with accuracy not rhetorical convenience, because I actually am trying to argue in good faith. There are women who are insulated from mainstream culture to an extent, but all who exist within our borders are affected by it at some point. Also a delineation should be drawn between unconscious bias and cogent bias in women. From my POV, You want to call…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:04 PM
3

Women select the men they let into their lives, girls do not. Unfortunately they often model the same behaviors as their mothers in their criteria for mate selection and maintaining boundaries. Ergo, "Choosing Better" still applies MOST of the time to A woman facilitating the abuse scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:58 PM
9

Women say something = feminists. Yall gotta stop that shit man All women that have been publicly educated or have interacted with mainstream culture have been exposed to the biases of institutional feminism. When they evince the behaviors articulated by institutional feminism, I am perfectly fine with regarding them as such. Most tradconservative women are just 90's Feminists doing the speed limit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:55 PM
1

Are you part of the demographic here that doesn't understand the difference between fantasy and reality? Looking forward to reading the next romantasy book where some tone-deaf self insert falls in love with the toxic strawman that existed in her head. (I hope I don't have to spell out my obvious rebuttal). Like I have said ad nauseum, attraction is a basal instinct that pre-empts the reasons used to justify it, especially in women. The line between what gets the imagination off and the reality …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:40 PM
2

I replied to you. Women are the gatekeepers of who has access to the most vulnerable be they children, sick people, or old people. Its not a coincidence that women dominate these fields which are letting in these abusive men I previously alluded to. Your failure to substantively engage with the observations I made in the previous comment is noted. Just another example of a woman myopically curating the facts of a situation to fit the emotional convenience of their world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:31 PM
4

This conveniently makes anything you disagree with untrue. Are you going to explain how? 💀 There is nothing convenient about trying to fight systemic abuse predicated upon institutional bias. I am well aware of the credibility issue which comes when you cannot depend on good faith oversight, which is why I take the time to try to read the materials when I am able to. But the, myopic convenience of the dogmatic "Appeal to Authority" crowd needs to be called out every time we see it. Institutions …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:23 PM
0

Most women have experienced some form of violence from a male in their lives. "Some form" is deliberately nebulous and is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Men know that if they hit a woman that just stabbed them, they are opening themselves up to being murdered or incarcerated by the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:18 PM
1

Contentless rhetoric. How many of these serial abusers are brought to these communities because a majority of women voters are voting for open borders? How many of these serial abusers are tacitly permitted to continue menacing their communities by a female dominated court system? It certainly seems like women are actively bringing these "bad actor" men into their communities by deliberately attacking anyone who wants to preserve boundaries. They then use the overt behaviors evinced by these sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:14 PM
4

a lot of sexual assault, abuse, molestation and harassment occurs while underage and/or completely outside of the context of dating. "Choosing better" isn't applicable to the circumstances that many women have had to go through, and as a result your allegation that dangerous behavior like having hookups, living in cities or attending college means women shouldn't be taken seriously when relaying nonconsensual experiences and fears is also pretty silly. How many minors are sexually assaulted by m…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:54 PM
1

We have rational minds and instinctual drives that actually prompt the behaviors we enact. Most reasoning amounts to ad hoc justifications. How much of female erotic consumption is of the CNC violent variety? From what I have seen it is statistically significant, if not the majority of female fantasies. Why do women naturally gravitate towards more aggressive male archetypes? I have seen so many women struggle with making their unsafe fantasies "safe" for talking about with their friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:47 PM
2

Then we don’t have to believe or care about anything men say either You do if you want a functional society that pays for all the social entitlement programs women are addicted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:41 PM
1

Many in the MRM including myself, admit this. I have seen prominent MRM guys such as Goldberg point this out. They point out MGTOWs/Redpillers/ MRAs secretly still crave Women nand Long-Term Relationships and want to be Betabuxxers. I have no issue with this claim. Overly reductive, wanting to be stable financially and have a healthy sustainable relationship with a woman is not hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:39 PM
1

Hope you have learned your lesson to not post things you can’t defend. I fail to see what he got "wrong" in your "assessment ?" I just see the typical 'name & shame' ad hom tactic used by bad faith debaters on your "side."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:37 PM
0

Maybe the problem isn't women. Who said it was? The issue is the institutional enforcement of gynocentrism and objectively false Feminism talking points. Politicians control the funding that goes to regulatory agencies. These Agencies then shape policy around that awarding contracts to Politician supported NGOs. These Politician supported NGOs then fund "research" that supports the ideological narratives that Politicians can draw from to get them elected. Everyone knows that only certain categor…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:27 PM
7

Women understand the risks and we talk about these risks because we want MEN to change. The biggest mistake of feminism/gynocentrism today is Utopian Blank Slatism...the presumption that biologically hardwired human characteristics can be altered through social conditioning. This is a fatal error that I have seen replicated in all putative "Feminists."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:21 PM
1

Can it be because men discovered unpleasant truth? Yes it can. But it also can be because it's complete bullshit. This is actually a hugely important thing to me. I believe that an honest man must be willing to be eclectic in how they gather information, we must be willing to hold our nose and engage with people we despise, because there are nuggets of truth buried under the mire of vitriol and contempt. We passively take in what is said and then try to discern what statements are factually supp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:06 PM
1

What we perceive about ourselves, what we think we value, versus what we actually respond to are completely different. But then men also claim to know patterns of women's behavior/attraction. And partly those patterns come from observation, partly from logical errors in those observations, partly from some beliefs that they caught somewhere, some emotions etc. What logical errors are your referring to? With women it would appear that most attraction is instinctual, and the justifications for "in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:44 PM
1

I mean "casual erotica" to be getting sexual with little other attachment. An rhetorically illicit dichotomy. Also your usage of "casual" just became even more nebulous. I know plenty of male audience erotica that involves emotional attachment, and take that female audience minotaur milking book...you can't tell me that the emotional connection BS is serious. And women tend to want LTR with someone they're seriously interested in than men will. E.g. We'll tend to wait longer for compatibility to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:12 AM
2

I don't agree with you. I grasp what you're saying. And I don't agree with it. If I was your English Composition Professor I would have given you a D at best for your attempts to paraphrase what I am saying. You just said that I wanted to be the bait? And before that you acted like I was trying to lure women? Then before that I supposedly was upset because women could see through my "bullshit" while at the same time allegedly thought they were not human/like fish? Your strawmen suck, because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 11:18 PM
2

"Plenty of fish in the sea" which implies there's always more people to meet. Not that dating is like fishing. If dating is not like fishing, then why is 'plenty of fish in the sea" being invoked almost exclusively with regards to dating? 😂 You clearly aren't reading carefully since you consistently are demonstrating a fundamental inability to grasp what I am saying. Hey man, if you want to see women as fish and yourself as bait. Go off. Have fun. I was clearly invoking a comparison regarding ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 11:07 PM
1

Ah yes, the PPD classic, "you don't understand me, so you must be dumb". 🙄 Your concepts don't make any sense. Rhetorically convenient myopia is hilarious. (I am being nice and assuming this is just a shitty tactic) Here is another analogy you won't get, arguing with women like you about female dating patterns is like arguing with a Boomer about why the housing market strategies they have employed is fucked on the macro level. People often are conveniently unable to "get it" when the illogical s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 10:59 PM
2

Oh look you went back and edited to have the correct use of projection. Good job! Though, I'm married. What? 💀 like I said, when you are just rapid-fire responding, you are clearly not reading what I am saying. So are you suggesting that I'm bitter because I don't agree with you and find the whole "looksmax" discourse to be ridiculously pathetic? Its incredibly niche and valid for a specific subset of women. I was not even endorsing looksmaxing in general, but in a visually focused (social media…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 10:54 PM
1

So....you're not using "projection" correctly. Do you want to try another tactic? You just said that I was referring to certain women "who can see through my bullshit" and that I don't see women as people? So which of these contradictory strawmanned views am I supposed to believe? 😂 Fishing and dating aren't alike. 🙄 How are they not alike? Men/fishermen are likely the pursuers in both scenarios and are trying to meet a specific type of woman or fish? Also how does your inability to grasp what a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 10:40 PM
2

You mean women with experience who don't fall for bullshit "An analogy is a comparison between two different things to show how they are alike, usually to help explain a hard idea or a new concept." Catching fish and dating aren't the same thing in the slightest. You know they say that for a certain percentage of the population, they are specifically incapable of understanding abstraction. Keep doubling down though and showcasing your inability to engage in good faith with my argument. Viewing i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 10:24 PM
4

Why is this a surprise? Like....no shit. How articulate. I am merely positing why said men might not be receptive to half-assed anecdotes from certain women. ...you did just say it was 'interesting' in the previous comment. Women aren't fish. So that doesn't make any sense and really highlights my point. I was merely analogizing how the methodology used to catch fish looks different from the perspective of the pursued vs pursuers. Textbook epistemology. The Catfish (individual woman) perspective…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 09:55 PM
2

They refuse to accept what women say and act like they are more informed. Women in aggregate act very different from how women as individuals claim to behave. If I go fishing, I know that catching a Large Catfish is fundamentally different from fishing for trout. I know that, on average, you are more likely to catch larger quantities and more species of fish if you act like you are fishing for trout. If I am starving, why would I expend the energy or listen to someone who expects me to tailor my…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 09:25 PM
1

As for LTRs being pushed by women, if that was your perception, how many rungs higher were these guys? How many girls were in his orbit?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 08:39 PM
1

Casual erotica is huge with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 08:37 PM
1

I know about the Romantasy sis
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:25 PM
1

Sex is not a trivial, frivilous thing, even though we treat it as it is. You are literally biohacking your brain to imprint on the person you are copulating with. With men it's especially dangerous because you are Pavlovian Conditioning yourself into needing someone else's physical validation, and tying it to your ego or sense of self. One of my biggest regrets is getting sucked into a sexual relationship too early in life. My rationalization was that I was going to marry the person I was with, …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:20 PM
2

Sugar Dating is just Over-Priced Prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:03 PM
0

WTF is Sugar Dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:02 PM
1

This seems appropriate
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:49 PM
1

Does she know you bro? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:48 PM
1

What part annoyed you specifically? My ex loved Turn, but I couldn't stand it. Don't get me started on trueblood.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:45 PM
1

Yeah like those guys who play fantasy football instead of real sports like quidditch and LARPing. https://youtu.be/j_ekugPKqFw?is=OMtwt3fiyMgfQcTy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:42 PM
1

I have/had a surgeon buddy who used to send me worse stuff from medical journals. He's desensitized to it but I get grossed out. Pretty funny guy, solid, good spotter. But I had to block him after a while. He has crazy stories. There was a...mentally disabled guy who was "blocked up" vascularly (down there) because he was more into gaming than... well gooning. (Literally lacked the drive). The prescription was literally, "manually clearing" the blockage. How tf do you broach that? I didn't catch…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:31 PM
1

Yeah I can see the sadomassochistic angle, still gross though. I had some rando transwoman from this sub DM me once, said she had "big clit energy." Solid joke, still gross to send a Pic though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:18 PM
2

I don't think they are (at least not proportionally). It's funny because I literally had a conversation with a mod about this issue the other day and they played dumb about it. I would volunteer, but I will not doxx myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:14 PM
1

Per Capita? Also you should make an exception for migrant communities with different mores.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:11 PM
1

Its not the cake, its the reaction to it. These women are statistically more likely to be in healthcare, administration, and education. That's a recipe for systemic discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:08 PM
1

Pretty sure both manifest in violence anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:07 PM
1

...I really think they are trying to backdoor mass surveillance and are using LLMs as an excuse. We already have Flock Cameras and now they are trying to incorporate this with Schoolbusses too (continual surveillance). Look at what they are doing to jobseekers with that Eightfold AI that datascrapes your PC to make ghost profiles on all the candidates.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:05 PM
1

You know there is this moment, when a woman decides to leave relationship, and a man finally realizes that she is serious (too little to late) and he tries to save relationship. And... I have already seen this Romcom...it sucked the first 19 times. Also, I doubt the men here are "desperate" they are trying to air legitimate grievances.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:59 PM
1

Sending her dick pics knowing perfectly well that they are not going to be well received, that's objectification. Realistically, this behavior has to work with somebody right? Otherwise why do they keep doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:57 PM
1

Vibe all you want, You need to have resources for them to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:55 PM
1

Send her the prancersize workout video. You know the lady teaching you to dance like a horse?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:53 PM
1

I literally got an unsolicited 🍆 Pic once from this subreddit once. 💀. So watch out! 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:41 PM
1

You will be required to show proof of XY chromosomes. You might want to rephrase this 💀. I can see this degenerating very easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:40 PM
2

Let's do a simple thought experiment. You have Group A and Group B. Group A attacks Group B, kills all the males and most of the children, incorporates Group B's women. Add in attrition from environmental disasters and similar events across multiple generations. How likely is it that Group B's Y chromosome survives? Does female sexual selection come into play? Sure, but is it sufficient to account for a bottleneck? (NO). The Genghis Khan model has A LOT more data. There is corroborating material…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:55 PM
1

Just sex? No, I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:37 PM
1

Physical validation, actual interest. Most prostitutes used to say that they were often emotional outlets as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:27 PM
1

No, I consider it co-related. But I was referring to there being multiple bottlenecks detected in general (mitochondrially?). The Y chromosomal bottleneck is probably a separate issue. Your whole polygyny argument is predicated upon my ignorance, so lets see some sources please.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:26 PM
1

Found it: https://youtube.com/shorts/7kMm9vdrxYQ?is=ChIYGFeKL-ZdKbLm
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:20 PM
1

I follow this issue closely: https://youtube.com/shorts/vETRZKrr7P8?is=3MKMWWYPXbwYAzYt There was one where he covers multiple bottlenecks. Trying to find it. (I hate how YouTube search works).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:17 PM
1

I don't think polygyny is a sufficient answer for the genetic disparity in representation. I also don't think the material evidence supports it. I am familiar with papers talking about it before. Calling me ignorant doesn't make your argument stronger. You provide citations and I'll provide my own.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:11 PM
1

You do know there are multiple bottlenecks right? Natural disasters contributed to attrition rate, as well as intraspecific killings. Also the unsavory kidnapping practices are well attested to based on nomadic and hunter gatherer cultures. Look at how the Comanche operated, adult men were usually killed off, women were incorporated. This is just one example, there are many many more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:06 PM
1

Which ones? I dispute that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:01 PM
1

Men in those classes were often still pursuing romantic relationships in other contexts. Marriage (right or wrong) was often a matter of business or family.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:01 PM
0

Maybe men are mad things have flipped. Maybe men are mad because disengenuous women denigrate and strawman them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 08:58 PM
1

I am familiar with the Y Chromosome bottleneck, men inherently have a higher attrition rate within a hunter gatherer context. We know this from extant populations. I hold the social customs/polygyny argument as less credible than environmental catastrophes and intraspecific warfare. There is also the genocidal hypothesis regarding cultural responses to Paleolithic plagues. Edit: downvoting me is not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:00 PM
1

"Nice Ass" =/= "Want to Fuck?" See the difference?😂 Validation should be measured according to the nature and depth of investment. There are tiers to this. An in&out burger is a disposable ephemeral form of consumption. Its not a place you should go to regularly, and those that do are inherently "lower-tier" consumers. Just because a billionaire has a burger once, does not mean that's his go to meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:08 PM
4

Its mainly guys here complaining about their loneliness and how its unfair. “Male Loneliness Epidemic” wouldnt be a thing if those would STFU and not cause problems in society. 90% of the posts here are denigrating men. 😅 Also if your birthrate is plummeting, then you don't have a society, you have a death cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:06 PM
1

You can keep repeating yourself, but you are ignoring everything I am saying 😂. I did talk about validation, you clearly are more of a talker than a reader. Also, don't call her a bitch please. She was an objectively awful person when I knew her, (like genuinely sociopathic), but I hope that she got her act together. Also I don't need to pick one, when the comparison is not "bimodal." We are distinguishing between different types of things. I am merely pointing out an error with your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:56 PM
3

It is. You just dont like the women you deem ugly and insufferable are popular. I don't like validating bad behavior AND I recognize that not all validation is the same. "Nice ass" isn't the same as "I want to fuck." 😂 Women just see attention, they often aren't able to tell the difference. (This is more an issue with social media tbh) Men are often portrayed as dogs, but we are more discerning than you think. Its why there is so much failed monkey-branching these days. Let me make my words bigg…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:39 PM
9

"Experts"🙄 Lady, I got this from evolutionary psychology/paleo anthropology. This is JUST math, women are inherently more valuable from a biological reproductive standpoint, ergo losing a woman has an innately higher "cost" to a community than losing a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:29 PM
2

But you just said men fuck ugly women. If women were into casual sex like men, there would be no reason to fuck ugly women because the man's looks match would be available to him. I have "had access" to attractive women and declined because I was disgusted by their behavior. Some of the worst people I have known have been "conventionally" attractive. There is a point where a person is so objectively awful that it overrides their corporeal assets. Like where listening to her talk, actually turned…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:26 PM
2

Because women aren't interested in casual sex like men are, so men have to lower their looks standards to get it. Not my experience. But there is a tacit assumption that sexual interest is tantamount to relationship interest. This is incorrect. If she got ALOT of simps she's popular. Doesnt matter that you hate those simps, SHE'S POPULAR. Algorithmically curated simping is not organic. Liking how a woman's ass looks in a photo is not the same as liking the woman IRL. Also some Simping is simply …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:18 PM
2

Why wouldn't she? SHE'S POPULAR. I am talking 4s and below, in aggregate, acting like they are 5s and above. The real issue is Simping...not even sure I fully disagree with you. The other issue is that male promiscuity at higher levels does not discriminate, (more of a numbers mindset).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:08 PM
18

Look as a guy who once dated for looks (kind of), give me a mid with a good personality anyday. There was a girl I knew who I wasn't initially attracted to, but the way she talked bumped her up to like an 8 in my mind. Also she was genuinely a good person. I really miss her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 02:58 PM
7

That's just how evolutionary reproduction works. A tribe can survive losing half its men, it cannot survive losing half its women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 02:55 PM
2

The dating market is not the relationship market. The ego leads to a hyper inflated social currency that doesn't convert to external metrics. Women get a lot of attention, that doesn't translate to actual investment. I once personally knew a girl whose ass had 5 million followers on Instagram. I went clubbing with this bruja, and let me tell you, she was the most insufferable human being I ever met. I spent the entire night trying to ditch her, but she kept getting in my car. (Shitty Uber ridesh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 02:53 PM
1

Is it ever their fault? Does every suboptimal outcome need to be reduced to an external source?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:18 AM
1

Fine, then "You debate like Jeffery Epstein." Like I said. DONE. You are incapable of being good faith. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:47 AM
1

Not as wives. Lady, no. You don't get to accuse me of something horrible and try to talk to me. Do it again and I'll report you. This BS is Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:44 AM
1

That’s not why less women are homeless though. I am not going to take that on faith from you. I don't pretend to know the full reason, but I don't buy that prostitution is the only explanation for this since women have more built in support networks via the government, friends, and familiy. Men tend to be isolated, atomized, and destroyed., Look, I have tried to engage with you in good faith, but after what you just said to me via DM, I would appreciate you stopping. Its Out Of Scope to the conv…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:45 AM
1

It’s because women can prostitute themselves. That is legitimately possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:22 AM
1

We all try to be neutral. I am just saying that we purposely try to have moderators with a variety of viewpoints so that we can call each other I'll give you this, you haven't [so far], tried to cut out my tongue. If you have been around for as long as you appear to be, then you know about the kind of "moderation" I am talking about. I also fundamentally disagree with both of your warnings so far. [Assuming Modteam wasn't you]. Not being Blue Pill, I recognize that I have a "controversial perspe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:21 AM
1

You are free to start your own sub that is better and fairer than this one, I think. Right buddy...literally every group I have seen advocating for young men has been brigaded, damaged, or destroyed. BUT my subreddit would make it? 😂 Also pretty sure people used to be sayinf the same thing about Twitter before Elon bought it. Not the biggest fan of X, but it had a similar standard of moderation as this place. Also I am going to go ahead and see this sniping as a tacit admission that you are mode…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:12 AM
1

You think that every moderator here is the same person? No. 🙄 I know about the alternate ModTeam account you guys use...and I know of other subreddit moderation scandals involving sockpuppet accounts. I also think there is a selection bias in who gets chosen. Not impressed to be frank. Thanks for demonstrating your bad faith framing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:06 AM
1

I don't hate women, I just refuse to support people trying to profit off disenfranchising men. It’s not misandry to nor want to meet a stranger online. I was saying that my inclination was to at least be be courteous with people I vehemently disagreed with online, if I met in person. I never wanted to meet YOU obviously. Do you not understand hypotheticals or abstraction? Because this debate is only one aspect of what a human being is...its overly reductive to say that being a misandrist is ALL …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:03 AM
1

It’s so foul that the average man thinks a housewife is a prostitute. I got this from anti-nuclear family Feminists so....also there's that misandrist "average man" again..😂 Conversely, I think its "foul" that women think its acceptable to for men to stay in sexless marriages (barring health reasons and desire to raise children) there should be scales of reciprocal investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:16 PM
1

Men are able to apply to general relief, food stamps, section 8 housing, Medicaid, welfare, and disability. You’re delusional if you think they can’t. Delusional must be your new favorite word 😂. Again, factoring the rampant entitlement fraud (which on average does NOT serve men), my point is STILL that its abusive to force struggling men to subsidize a cohort of unaccountable people that hate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:12 PM
0

You’re delusional if you think the women who are at risk of homelessness are the ones getting married to nice guys that they maliciously screw over in an alimony argument. What a bad faith interpretation. My point is that a lot of women secure financial independence, social mobility, and housing through bad faith marriages and court sanctioned parasitism, not that all "women at risk of losing housing" fall into this bracket. However, I would counter that you are delusional if you think that NONE…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:10 PM
1

What a weird answer. I don’t want to meet you. I don't want to meet you either, misandrist.😂 The point is that the rhetoric evinced on reddit is not necessarily reflective of the behavior irl. So the interactions you are using to judge the typical man are even less accurate than what most reasonably skeptical people would think.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:06 PM
1

No. I mean exchanging sex for housing.[...] Some men do it too. So...oldest profession kind of things. Honestly that makes sense. Something men deeply wish they could do with women If you mean men who want a traditional marriage, I don't think its fair to be casting them in that predatory a light. When I have had the desire "to take care of" a woman I was romantically attached to, the idea of sexual reciprocity was more for confirming the authenticity of her interest in me. (What women get from …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:02 PM
0

If you think that every moderator here is abusive, though, then I don’t know what to tell you. You would think a debate moderator would know not to strawman. Anyone can create sockpuppet accounts with misrepresentative flair or just use the Modteam account as a shield. as we seem to have no problems attracting other users to this sub. Lol, "attracting" "We don't need to reform our local court system, we are getting even MORE business now that the legislature shut down altenative forms of seeking…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:33 PM
1

Ergo men have no safety nets and still have to subsidize people that hate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:20 PM
1

You can always do the marriage-> divorce pump and dump too...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:19 PM
1

The reason why less women are on the streets is because women can exchange sex for housing. You mean marriage don't you? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:18 PM
1

This forum reflects a lot of views that are now mainstream. I suspect there is a frame of reference issue here. Acknowledging that women in aggregate are engaging in unreasonable behaviors will naturally be harder to see from a woman's perspective. We all have blindspots. Me especially.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:12 PM
1

Promiscuous refers to the act of indiscriminate mixing more than plurality. English's myopic usage is not my problem. Not understanding what words mean, is not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:08 PM
1

We have multiple moderators here with different viewpoints here to check the influence of other moderators, much like the US Supreme Court does. That doesn't excuse demonstrable bad faith behavior. Or the gerrymandered process for selecting moderators. This might not be the community for you, then, as we seem to have no problems attracting other users to this sub. And what is the attrition rate for banning by pill, big dawg? Not buying it. This sub became a thing after TRP got quarantined. (Or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:02 PM
0

It also gives an anonymous mask to hide behind, to rubberstamp your badfaith decisions. Reddit does not have a court of higher authority I can appeal to, so I prefer defaulting to transparency and documenting your demonstrable bad faith enforcement myself. I am handling you the same way a lawyer handles a bad faith judge, documenting it for public record.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:38 PM
1

No you are very typical. Males are angry and hold women to great contempt. If you are a 1% commenter here, then the majority of men you are interacting with are by definition, not a representative sample. (Men only end up here under certain conditions) It is a disservice to men in general to regard me as typical, I hold myself to be below median at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:29 PM
1

I am serious. If you were to take every shelter bed, the vast majority would be male beds. How many men vs women end up on the street? You claim to be "serious," so prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:26 PM
1

Do you not understand abstraction and hypotheticals? A man evaluating a woman's promiscuity will always necessarily entail the prospect of multiple partners. Not out of slut shaming but out of concerns for her indiscriminate behavior. It showcases a fundamental recklessness and lack of accountability. If she is frivilous in relations with other men, she will be frivilous with me. One becomes two the very moment the first relationship is gone and she is entertaining. Its why "No Hymen, No Diamond…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:24 PM
0

The vast majority of homeless shelter beds are for men though. You are genuinely incapable of arguing in good faith. You already have showcased misandry (I am a typical man, lol) and now you are whining that not enough of them are dying on the street. The vast majority of women have priority in welfare, entitlement programs. Also logically, if more men are homeless, than more men would be inclined to such services. However, women always get preference in homeless shelters and ONLY women have wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:11 PM
0

Most men view most women as holes who they resent and hold great contempt for I only reserve contempt for unaccountable people. You are an example of the typical male. Unrepresentative sample. I have been told that I am too hard on myself, but I genuinely hold most men and women in higher esteem. Men view women as sex objects but also stupid and manipulative villains who they constantly have to try to outsmart and take advantage of. I think that social media addiction is a vector for spreading m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:05 PM
1

His Reddit profile is right there, You ad hommed using an out of scope mental health crisis, a 1% commenter that makes it personal...and the mods are crickets... What a surprise. Like I said, men like to be conniving and cruel. Typical misandrist schtick
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 06:58 PM
0

Instead of seething about Epstein island, you seethe that kids get a mild amount of government support. That is a disengenuous assertion, I am STILL angry about elite pedophilia. Oh so you’re bitter that you may have to pay taxes so her kids can get food stamps, Medicaid, welfare, and homeless housing. If men as a class are struggling more than women, (and are statistically more likely to be denied benefits) it is beyond disgusting to force these men to bail out unaccountable women and people th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 06:55 PM
1

lol what an odd way of thinking. Most people think, isn't that odd? Promiscuity isn’t fucking one person repeatedly. Yes. Promiscuity typically is used to refer to multiple people, but the part I was focusing on was the correlated state of being indiscriminate, since this trait is being viewed from the lens of a current or future partner. If you read the hypothetical, I was referring to a man B, having concerns because the woman was having more sex with man A before she was with him. I view this…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 06:51 PM
0

....Do you not know how taxes work? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 06:42 PM
1

If I dug through your medical records to call you a hypocrite...who's the bigger monster? I would be, obviously. Like I said, "modern" women and accountability are like water off a duck's ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:36 PM
1

False. You grossly over estimate how many men are into women. The human race would not exist if most men were not into most women. We aren't straddling extinction like a panda.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:34 PM
1

"Where you imply" You people keep arguing with strawmen in your own head.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:30 PM
1

How do you propose to discover this? Well you start by not censoring the people who are consistently able to predict a woman's behavior. Why do you think the redpill resonates with people? It anticipated everything my ex did before she did it. Feminism is dogshit at modeling human behavior, for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:29 PM
1

No contentless rhetoric Good thing I screenshot anything. Thanks for providing evidence of your own hypocrisy chief. The truth stands even if you try to wipe it away, you can run from accountability but you can't escape.the consequences of your actions. That's just how reality works.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:26 PM
1

What the fuck is an unaccountable promiscuous woman??! "I fucked 5 men, and got 5 children, but men won't marry me because they don't want a 'strong independent woman.'" That is an unaccountable promiscuous woman
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:23 PM
1

"A lot of you" Is not "all of you" Typical shenanigans
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:03 PM
1

That is a gross thing to do. Like I said earlier, a lot of you don't see men as equals. I have things to do, buhbye
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:50 PM
1

Did she snake him or not? Honestly you should do the same with a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:36 PM
1

So you’re making up excuses for picking Stacy only instead of holding yourself accountable. I am not a puritan, I don't shame a woman for having a sexual history, but I pay attention to her past relationship with her ex. I would also be lying if I said it didn't make me question her credibility for a LTR. Women are always unique as individuals, but in dating its like dating a TikTok hivemind. I sometimes wonder if girls pre-social media were this bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:08 PM
1

This sounds like women and dating. We prefer the good apples, but most men are bitter, angry, and mean spirited How many have you asked out in the last week? I am talking to around 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:04 PM
0

Since you’re an HIV and US Aid worker, I worked for the USAID contractor, I wouldn't say I did it myself. and how the few women who are promiscuous shouldn’t be ridiculed. Good thing its only the unaccountable women I take issue with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:03 PM
1

If a woman fucks A like a methed up jackrabbit but won't kiss B in public, I think B has licit reasons for being concerned about her promiscuous history....even if A was the #only# person she ever fucked. Remember what I said about reading comprehension?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 09:47 PM
1

See? It’s like an apple tree all the apples are rotten. All the men hate all the women. “Pick better men” isn’t good advice when all the men are bitter and horrible. I love women. When you are going through the sh■t, there is nothing better than having a good woman having your back. The problem is unaccountable women. Like women who bully a guy for having a mental health crisis (some of whom are medical professionals) and then pretend to have done NOTHING wrong. The other woman I was responding …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 09:37 PM
1

I wasn’t abusing anyone. This is where your hostility comes from. If pulled a phone call record of you crying on a suicide hotline and used it to mock you and called you a hypocrite, I would have gotten called out as a monster. If I had pulled what you did on a debate team, I would have been barred for life. The moderators here must tacitly approve of your abuse, because they continue to allow it going on. Its too bad, because this subreddit could have neen a hell of a lot better than it is, if …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 09:27 PM
1

Nothing you said proves women have a lot more than 4 partners. Nothing I said alleged that women had a lot more than 4 partners. Promiscuity doesn't have an n count requirement to apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 09:22 PM
1

Not really. You were hostile. You really are ready to die on the hill of abusing a man who was having a mental health crisis? (By someone in the Healthcare industry no less) It was not only out of scope, it didn't refute what he said. Playing crybully isn't winning you any points with me, it just reaffirms that I was in the right for what I did. The fact that you are a 1% commenter and completely unable to acknowledge that this behavior is unacceptable IS an overt indictment of the moderation te…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 07:29 PM
-1

No you are extremely hostile. They aren’t falsely targeting anyone. You are condoning character assassination based on out-of-scope statements made on a different subreddit during a mental health crisis. I despise the behavior, I don't have any personal animosity towards anyone here. I do think that the moderation here is out of line for allowing it (literally failing to uphold Reddit's TOS). I am doing y'all a favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 07:18 PM
1

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm This is from the cdc. The cdc is not perfect, but I doubt there’s a grand conspiracy where women have, say, 100 partners instead of 4. Methodology issues aside, (there are A LOT) if Feminism has been around since the 60s & 70s, and is represented at every University and HR department, then its safe to say that these studies are not immune to gynocentrist bias. The astroturfed "Patriarchy" has been supplanted by IRL Gynocentrist Systemic …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 06:54 PM
1

I can see where you went wrong. If you want, I can pm you because the mods don’t let us have personal discussions. Its not personal, I am sure everyone here is lovely IRL, I wish the best for all of you, even the bad faith ones. Human beings are not fully rational, I maintain that acknowledging this doesn't dehumanize anyone. You can PM me if you want, but I don't expect to be around on this subreddit much longer anyway since the Mods are targeting me for calling them out allowing illicit behavi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 06:37 PM
0

It doesn’t mean that it’s a trend. "Just because one guy is killing multiple people, doesn't mean it's a trend!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 06:31 PM
1

You wrote basically nothing. You demonstrably read "basically nothing," as evinced by your inability to reference any of it. You don’t view women as human beings. Literally acknowledged the humanity of women ina previous comment. Can't make this BS up... Women read the stuff men write about us online Considering you are arguing with strawmen, I don't think they all do... Men’s spaces with red pill and MGTOW have been around since the internet’s inception. Are you trying to justify not reading th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 06:29 PM
1

See? It’s a disgusting thing to think that it’s even trending. I don't need to "think" anything, there is documented evidence and police reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 06:17 PM
1

It’s not a lazy tactic. Myopic convenience amounts to weaponizing "playing the idiot," strawmanning, and having the reading comprehension of a black out drunk. No one is impressed by rhetoric that is predicated upon deliberately misrepresenting your opponent's point. If you are capable of steelmanning your opponent's position, argue it better than he can, and STILL win? That is laudable. But that requires arguing in good faith. I havent missed your point at all, you just formulated it poorly and…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:51 PM
0

That is called Hyperbole. The "Friday Night" phrase is so absurdly specific that you'd have to absurdly naive or deranged to interpret it literally. My previous comments about women (in aggregate) trending towards promiscuity stand. Myopic convenience is the debate equivalent of taking a sh□t on the floor. No one is impressed by such lazy tactics. Lastly, there is no ad homenim attack Attacking him for out of scope mental heath episodes from external threads is the definition of "Ad Hom" but tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:34 PM
1

I don't think it's regularly occurring, but its demonstrably trending upwards, just like the female teachers sleeping with their male students.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:23 PM
1

I mean…. You don’t see women as human beings. Human beings are not as inherently rational as we like to pretend. Attraction is driven by instinct which is separate from rational thought. Instinct can be hijacked through social engineering and technology, we see it all the time. So I am not sure why you expect women to do the same. I don't, this cohort has consistently shown that their only operating principles are hedonic utility and emotional convenience. Any uncomfortable truth that contravene…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:21 PM
0

Nope. The original premise of OP’s post is that he thinks that women are all whites who sleep with a new man every week throughout it their entire 20’s. Yeah, not going to take incoherent hearsay seriously. Of course we can't see it because the moderators here objectively suck. Speaking personally, I would say that most young women (in aggregate) trend towards high bodycount promiscuity. Especially since social media algorithmically promotes a set of behaviors as "normal" and a bunch of faceless…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:12 PM
1

Or maybe just maybe you’re making up baseless assumptions to fit into your bizarre worldview because any other explanation would cause you severe dissonance Pot, meet kettle. Projection is a hell of a drug. Being Blue Pill means you prioritize your relationship's "Narrative" over acknowledging uncomfortable truths. Blue Pill is literally predicated upon maintaining a carnival ride running on baseless assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:00 PM
1

They don’t.. I must have hallucinated all that whining about Asmongold saying he preferred gaming to dating...🙄 https://youtu.be/woIxnofUXgc?is=UTgEDjXN2pY5Ahc8
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:57 PM
1

L- take. Again, having to pick through a pile of rotten apples doesn't mean that the man wouldn't prefer a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:52 PM
1

They can't read what your saying because they are too busy dabbing over the strawmen in their head.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:50 PM
1

Think about what you just asked me for a moment and how is it in any way, shape, or form related at all to what I said. Bro, you are asking gynocentrists to think. "Modern" women have two operating principles, Emotional Convenience and Hedonic Utility. If a truth contravenes either of these two principles, it gets discarded with prejudice. Ultimately, the only thing this sub is good for is showcasing this prejudice to men with discernment. It's not about winning over women who recreationally hat…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:49 PM
1

So you admit that men are just choosing “bad girl” stacy over the good ones due to hypergamy, preselection, and superficiality. "Yo, Jimbo, why do you keep eating all of those bad apples?" "You see ANY good ones?" Your "side," spends more time arguing than they do thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:44 PM
0

What if the wayward promiscuous women you insult so rudely also have mental health issues? Hard to take this "but what about Wahmen?" seriously when its following a thread going after this guy for his mental health issues. The fact that the moderators are so unequal in their enforcement of "civility" really highlights the gynocentrist bias against men. 👎
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:40 PM
1

lmfao imagine spam comment replying to my comments from THREE DAYS AGO you’re a bit late to the party also nah it’s a bachelor and I graduated with a distinction pookie x Well some of us actually care about the people crying out in pain. If you ostensibly work to help people, you are doing a terrible job representing Healthcare Workers. Is that supposed to impress me? What was the distinction? Being a walking stereotype, or ignoring the most patients in the ICU? Let me congratulate you on your "…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:26 PM
1

Sexually, too, but that’s of no matter to you as you don’t have sex. "Teehee, Who cares about the Hippocratic Oath?, it was written by a man!" In what world is that not overtly malicious? If his behavior is derived from trauma, you're just negating his ability to trust external help he might need to get better. OP, I asked my uncle (a real MD) and he said most doctors would either likely prescribe you lithium or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)...I highly recommend you look into CBT. I used au…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:19 PM
1

more than aware as a nurse Wow, more evidence of gynocentrist discrimination in the medical industry. "Tee hee, men are so stupid for not trusting the medical community, even though we ignore their symptoms and denigrate them at every opportunity." I am glad your 15 minutes of community college was enough to convince you that you were an expert in diagnosing "Misogyny." It's also hilarious that RNs are notorious for their promiscuity and inability to stay loyal to their men. I think there was a …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:00 PM
1

jerking off and thinking of sex/fucking 24/7 and fantasising about weird shit is a form of misogyny as it warps your views. different strokes for different folks tho Yeah you should be "civilized" and read a bunch of books about jerking off minotaur. What's booktok say? "We listen and we don't judge, wooo!" 🤡 Also, again, what is the diagnostic test for Misogyny again? When you stub your toe, do you curse "muh Patriarchy" for inventing door frames?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:53 PM
1

misogyny that is present in your posts is What exactly is the diagnostic test for misogyny? Where in the DSM is it listed? Why should anyone take your claims seriously if your go to move is to Ad Hom the Man? Women and accountability is like water off a duck's ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:49 PM
0

it is laughable because if you are truly causing scars on your penis, you need to be hospitalised for dangerous behaviour and self harm. Would you hold up to such scrutiny? I doubt it. Whining about misogyny while actively spreading it by attacking men when they are down? Great "look" lady. A woman can hand a suicidal man a loaded gun and still try to maintain she has done nothing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:46 PM
1

People say you’re bad because you are a raging misogynist. Big difference. The empathetic sex, ladies and gentlemen. Even if he was what you're pretending, you're not exactly helping with his "mistaken" impression of adversarial women, are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:42 PM
0

Plenty of women have "pills" of their own. The dogpill is the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:40 PM
1

So is the dog pill
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:40 PM
1

Turn off your comment history then brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 03:39 PM
1

Thank god. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Btw, I still think he murdered Kim Porter. Way too young to die of the "flu," and the symptoms resemble cyanide poisoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:39 AM
1

Life is life. I was anhedonic for long time, you either get over it or you die. If you come out the other side, you stop buying bullshit. One of the peculiarities of Women is that they are agreeable by nature. To be coalition-builders you have to be agreeable. The downside is that Women tend to care more about maintaining the "narrative" than telling the truth. That's not my nature. Respectfully I think you have a sanitized view of things..."growing apart" is narrative. You just aren't privy to …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:30 AM
2

I'm (mostly) happily married now and just lurk/comment on these subs because I find the debate interesting. I am (mostly) happy that your happily married now. Jk, good for you. I first discovered the MRA/red pill/PUA stuff years ago when looking for advice to help my dad protect himself in his divorce (ended up not being necessary, because my mom was a class act) Who initiated? Was infidelity involved and by which party? and when he started dating again, and have been following it on and off out…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:36 PM
1

Most of it comes from my own experience, but I have 10+ years experience conducting research on this. I know the presumption is that I am simply a bigot or an uneducated jackass, but that is sincerely not the case. If you want to genuinely understand my perspective on this you can read Steven Pinker's "The Blank Slate" and/or Dr. Steven Rhoads "Taking Sex Differences Seriously." (Pinker is more important overall and applies to more than just men and women). I am currently traveling and don't hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:47 PM
1

it is statistically men who leave relationships when their partners become less useful to them. take chronic and terminal diagnoses, for example. men are statistically more likely to leave their partners with a diagnosis like cancer because their wives can no longer do work around the house, or, more commonly, no longer can have sex with them and are less attractive. I am familiar with this purported statistic/argument I have several foundational issues with the way the data was interpreted. (I …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:33 PM
–

i’m in a commitment relationship with my man. we aren’t married and have been together for almost 8 months now. we live together, pay bills, have a promise ring. just not married. committed doesn’t have to mean marriage. I am happy for you. I am talking "commitment" for LTRs, (coming from a quasitraditional framework). RedPill doesn't (necessarily) question your ability to commit to a relationship, but there is some distinguishment regarding what commitment actually is when it comes to a woman. …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:11 PM
1

I am "challenging" it here. I prefer to be transparent because I have had Mods be abusive in DMs. TBC, I don't care what you do. I am doing what I believe to be right. I try to abide by the rules even though they seem to be poorly formulated and deliberately nebulous (most likely for bad faith moderation decisions). This sub in particular has developed a "reputation" for such activities.(I have neen documenting it for several years now). I have developed a thick skin on this sub because I know t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:30 PM
–

Also, why does it matter so much? Do you actually care or are you running interference for your "side?" It's a ltr credibility issue, we know how pair-bonding works with oxytocin generated from carnal exercise, we also know that bodycount is negatively correlated with longevity (on aggregate) with women. The short answer is that we wonder if she would be a "flight risk" if things went to sh*t. Speaking personally, I have had a lot of bad things happen to me, what is the evidence that she would a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:59 PM
1

OP was strawmanning red pill and black pill people as being unable to get laid, and extrapolating that problems regarding overt double standards about promiscuity stem from this. You doubled down on the strawman. You also illicitly claimed that me quoting op was the same as directly invoking red and black pillers. That was also incorrect, quotations refer to the original poster, this is basic grammar. By definition, your comment is as irrelevant as the original post. Not intimidated by strawmen.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:03 AM
0

You were referring to commenting to people being pilled. It's also irrelevant and makes no sense. Bye bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:50 AM
0

So it wasn't technically the start of my comment, it was your subject not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 01:58 AM
1

Actually that was a quotation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 01:42 AM
–

That's pretty civil. Bad faith moderation is not. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:19 AM
–

Doesn't mean strictly anything apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:37 PM
-1

Yes I did. We don't have traditional relationships anymore, this hedonism is what's left. I just am following the utilitarian standards that women apparently live by and applying them equally. What did you expect? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:35 PM
0

This sounds like alot of whining from you that women have more freedom and thus don't need marriage for survival and security. "Y-you j-just get no p-p-pussy!" 😂 All your "arguments" sound the same, spud.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:32 PM
0

You're now just creating fake arguments to debunk because you've consistently failed to debunk my actual one. Okay kiddo what's your argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:29 PM
1

I mean more like first pairing, iteration, lol. The comparison stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:28 PM
0

You...clearly don't know what aggregate means, you just know you disagree.🤣 That is a more plausible explanation than any of the drivel you've been spewing Bro, add some broccoli because you're steaming.🥦 I love how your argument is that I don't mean what I am saying. Nah cuz, I literally mean what I am saying. You're contention is seriously that there are NO commonalities that can be tracked across women's behavior as a group? 🤡 I don't think I am the one spouting drivel here cuz. Why do you NE…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:53 PM
–

"If Grug cry he no get snu snu, Lala leave, he get sad sad....if Grug strong she stay, get more snu snu" It's not that deep lady, its basic pattern recognition, it doesn't require Xenu hooking up all men to a frigging hive mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:50 PM
–

Plenty of men exhibit avoidant behaviors because it’s normalized due to patriarchy 🤡 I bet you did 😂 So do we download patriarchy updates from a central server? Or do they come out of a Feminist's ass? Please expound on the "lore" for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:47 PM
0

Im imagining a arranged marriage that was called off after rape. The fact that your mind went there says everything. 💀 I think it was year 3 or whatever. Not everyone is a wh□re in their committed. I honestly wish I hadn't had sex with her tbh, because I over comitted. ____/// If you are ordering something from Amazon and the box has been opened and or damaged. Would you send it back? Assess the condition first? Or just take it as is? I was referring to how most men
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:42 PM
0

When you use the phrase "in the aggregate" to describe a group, you mean considering the group as a whole total, rather than looking at its individual members or parts.It means you are summing up all the individual data points to look at the big picture. Here is what that looks like in practice: In Economics: "In aggregate," consumer spending rose by 5%, meaning the total amount spent by the entire country went up, even if some individuals lost their jobs or spent less. In Statistics: Analysts l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:36 PM
1

Yeah I think you're butthurt a woman rejected you so you're crashing out about women on here as a kneejerk reaction. That would explain why you don't have any coherent argument whatsoever Try not to get hayfever from all that straw 😂 My focus is on women, I honestly don't know if men in aggregate all act the similar ways. It would make sense. Aggregate is not a monolith, its about overall trending towards one specific archetype. With gravel you can have coarse aggregates or fine gravel, but they…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:31 PM
3

pay for her own trips Does your ideal woman also pay for a chair at the end of her bed? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:23 PM
1

If you subscribe to a pill, anyone is qualified to speak to what you believe as it is defined. If I was, I would be flaired that way. I think for myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:22 PM
0

These red and black pilled dudes can only see the world and people via projection. Sorry, all those strawmen made you feel that way, try not to get hay fever. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:21 PM
0

Women in aggregate behave similarly under similar conditions. Regardless of what OP may or may not have said.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:17 PM
1

I love my parents, I love my boundaries too. Bye Felicia.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:15 PM
1

In the world where you are not having sex as kids? 🤨 You know people who come out the box as nonvirgins? I only had sex with my ex because I thought we were getting married, and I am a dude...so...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:14 PM
1

How about waiting until you've met his people and hes met your people? Does she come from a broken home? Is her father there? Is the mother a harridan? No matter how good a woman may seem, if her sister and "folks" are known to be snakes, take everything she says with salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:11 PM
0

Men would still marry Margot Robbie if she gave it up on the first date Debatable. The treads on those tires looks a little worn, not safe for long-distance trips. The ephemeral promise of pussy is less important than staying whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:09 PM
1

The reality is if you do have sex the first night, unless that night turns into a few days you will never hear from them again. If she's done it with you and she's not a virgin, then she's pulled the same song and dance with someone else. If her Hedonistic ROIs fall below baseline, dump her and forget her. Discretion is optional of course, you can try to take a promiscuous girl seriously, but no one will respect you if she turns out to be a "Lily Singh" type.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:08 PM
1

Cool, but be up front about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:04 PM
1

Or don't date a promiscuous woman because the currency of your attention will inherently be worth less to her.... 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:02 PM
1

Its a clear dichotomy. Are you a virgin? Get traditional benefits. Not a virgin? Meet the Hedonistic ROIs of your "partner" as long as you are able.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:00 PM
-1

So wouldn't a lack of this also negate the relationship? Or are we just baselessly justifying double standards? Yes, but both needs are subject to external pressure. Both parties need to give a lot of grace for this. I wouldn't be humping on my wife's leg if she was suffering from post-partum depression for example. But since marital duties of loyalty have been thoroughly dismantled, modern LTRs have been reduced to ROI based transactions. It is unreasonable for a "modern" woman to be whinging a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:57 PM
0

Same group, different life phases. Your reading comprehension sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:33 PM
1

A lot of these men were avoidant before the women. Have you actually talked to them? I doubt it. I am so done with bad faith women unilaterally appointing themselves to speak on our behalf. Your cohort consistently fails to model and predict male behavior, let alone your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:21 PM
0

David M. Buss and David P. Schmitt. Their 1993 Sexual Strategies Theory proposed that humans possess distinct psychological mechanisms for: Short-term mating — sexual variety, multiple partners, relatively limited commitment or investment. Long-term mating — pair-bonding, commitment, mate retention, and parental investment. They applied both strategies to both sexes, while arguing that men, on average, show a stronger orientation toward sexual variety in short-term contexts. Other relevant autho…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:16 PM
0

A necessary element which negates the relationship once absent. "Important," cute. Men need physical validation in the same way Women need emotional validation. One begets the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:11 PM
-1

The target demographic I am currently representing not some ideologically captured harridan you've fraudulently appointed to speak on our behalf. "Credentials" 😂.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:07 PM
2

Clearly she hasn't been invited to the Diddy parties.🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:04 PM
1

"After their twenties" Do you understand how time works? Or do you need a peer-review with a bottle of lotion and a clock? Men seem to have two atavistic drives when it comes to reproduction, short term and long term. There has been evolutionary psychology articles written about it. I would send a link, but I am not convinced it would be worth my time. Since you previously claimed that you never met a single promsicuous woman. 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:02 PM
0

Learn Reading Comprehension: The only men I have known to engage with this "recreational" fucking after their twenties were doing so because they were conditioned into being an avoidant by the women they were dating. Ergo, who is actually preferring this?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:58 PM
1

Learn reading comprehension. The only men I have known to engage with this "recreational" fucking after their twenties were doing so because they were conditioned into being an avoidant by the women they were dating. Ergo, who is actually preferring this?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:57 PM
0

Cute, irrelevant. I already explained theb avoidant behavior post 20s ghat leads to recreational fucking. Again all have an incitng incident with a bad faith woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:56 PM
1

Women "in aggregate" are hypocritical about promsicuity, and engage in solipsistic reasoning when confronted with group behaviors. Also, I am not inclined to believe any claims you make if your first move is to argue in bad faith. Unicorns never hold up under scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:51 PM
-1

It is pretty well established in Evolutionary Psychology that men are operating according to two reproductive strategies, short-term and long-term. Women, in aggregate, is the operative phrase. We are talking about trending behaviors across the group not your handpicked unicorns (which never seem to hold up under scrutiny).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:46 PM
0

Thanks for the unsolicited and irrelevant take. I stand by what I said. "Happily going about their lives" right, because their operating principles are wholly predicated upon Hedonic Utility and Emotional Convenience. Also they have done studies on female friend groups. (Child psychology I believe). The hypothesis was that good influences would cancel out bad ones. However they all began to exhibit the undesired aberrant behaviors. This closely models what a lot of men have attested to in real l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:33 PM
0

☝️oh look, "evidence"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:43 PM
1

Myopia is not an argument
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:42 PM
1

Lots of people are in long-term relationships without being married. Well "marriages" don't mean what they once did, and "commitment" only means as much as a woman's convenience nowadays. Doesn't mean much of anything at all. That's why I made the joke about commitment meaning insanity. Lugnut here just couldn't follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:35 PM
1

If its not hatred its functional antipathy. As a man, no one in my cohort buys that empathetic gender bs. Its fairly ubiquitous in our reporting and my lived experience supports this. I grew up believing in all the equality jumbo jumbo, and I am telling you now, I would move to a gender segregated place in a heartbeat, just for a moment of peace. I suspect your "studies" were biased in term of methodology, or sampling, or in formulation in general. Conventional wisdom supports this, no one value…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:40 AM
–

It okay, English isn't your first language. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:10 AM
1

If an organization has a gynocentric bias, its rules will inevitably be prejudiced against men. I am sure there people making your terms of service argument at diners during Jim Crow.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:09 AM
1

Oh no, my dumb lady brain couldn't ever process a properly articulated argument. One must assume you don't have one. Here's an argument, I genuinely believe that women are biologically wired to have an empathy gap when it comes to men. Which if true, fair enough, I won't waste my time trying to lobby the ostensibly fairer sex for fairer treatment. However, I am done seeing struggling men be taxed to subsidize the elevation of people that demonstrably hate us. I am done with the idpol chicanery.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:06 AM
0

What a rational, logical thing to do. Not emotional at all. I don't listen to cloying nonsense. You won't listen. Boo hoo, go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:03 AM
1

As ever, you won't explain what you mean by this I genuinely think its a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:01 AM
1

Ah yes the ol My Lady of Perpetual Victimhood. Quarantine is a form of censure. r/Blackpill is allegedly gone. Look we get it, you don't see men as people. So go bother someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:59 AM
1

Child mortality rate, attrition rate. Buhbye Ms.Mountain time, I have shit to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:55 AM
2

Cool, I'm not her. Some men buy me birthday presents so you should buy me one too. https://youtu.be/8gnQx40JiBU?is=tMcM1bnaWNTC9SJ2
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:38 AM
0

A way that you see as bad faith, which may just be a way that disagrees with you. Sorry lady, I am not giving you gals here the benefit of the doubt anymore. Too solipsistic to engage with in good faith. Truth becomes subordinate to your emotional convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:35 AM
1

I am sorry is the redpill not quarantined? I am not one one of them but the incels routinely get purged from this very subreddit. The mods did an especially cruel April 1st prank one year.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:33 AM
2

Most men do have children now no matter what happened in the past, and even more men than that have sex! Most people exist outside 1st world countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:31 AM
1

Never known anyone to be deplatformed just for being a man. Yep. Not a surprise based on how you're arguing. Myopic convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:30 AM
2

Yes, most men and women do have sex, disease or no. Wrong. Evolutionarily speaking most men do not pass on their genes. "Scientist" 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:29 AM
1

you'd better have found a really good superior way of producing unbiased, accurate research. Or I could do what women have done and have an entire panel of men speak on your behalf. I mean why not?, they apparently have felt emboldened to speak on what is "wrong" with my demographic for years whilst simultaneously barring the target demographic from speaking for itself. Anita sarkeesian horseshit all over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:27 AM
2

You're going to be so embarrassed when you look it up. Or its just more gynocentrist propaganda. Either way, if there is a dirty dick, the women will find them, like moths and lightbulbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:23 AM
0

You feel that way, and because you feel that way and I'm a woman disagreeing, you will find an unfalsifiable way to dismiss me by saying women are stupid. I've seen it a million times. Of the subset of women who engage with me, 80% will choose to argue in a badfaith way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:21 AM
1

Yet I am bringing criticised for not wasting my time looking for links you're not going to click. Welcome to Reddit. I am arguing that the degree of social engagement is at least a way of corroborating that there is at least a kernel of truth in what my "side" is alleging. It's better than the peer reviewed circle jerks I was pestered about today.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:19 AM
1

Nobody else involved here has referenced a study either. You're holding me to a higher evidentiary standard. Most of our opinions are not formed based on studies. Idk what someone else said or why that should affect what I do. I literally had a chick tell me that everything I experienced is invalid because I didn't have a peer reviewed circle jerk to confirm everything I say. I think we should hold women to a higher standard since their go to move is ad humming and bad faith argumentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:13 AM
1

I didn't downvote you, you commented at midnight GMT when I wasn't even awake. Typical woman, eschewing accountability 😘 Jk. But in all seriousness, I don't believe you, women are walking petri dishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:10 AM
1

Mad as a hatter and cunning as a fox. Here's what you do...You should peer review my body of work and then lobby to censor it. Gotta make sure that pesky target demographic isn't allowed to speak for itself, so we'll misappropriate Congressional funds to start a mass surveillance program of people like me and then call me an "incel" when I try to say anything about it. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:07 AM
1

"Committed" relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:33 AM
1

So now you have to explain why some anecdotes are acceptable and others aren’t. And your answer to that is peer review? Lady what do you think the courts do all day? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:29 AM
0

Horrible and humiliating for the men. What “your the second place loser I’ve fucked every guy on the block but it’s ok you can take care of me now Don't worry a bunch of horrid bitches in congress will write a bill making you have to pay for them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:26 AM
3

No I am gonna have to peer review your request for links and then author a paper that blames everything on some evil external parasocial force that conspired to keep women housed and debt free...that no good, dirty rotten patriarchy with its functional economy and positive birthrate. We should all vote on sending all the men to war, so we can backdoor changes to how the currency functions while the men are away.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:19 AM
1

I am sorry but...I fundamentally disagree with your assessment. To be blunt you seem really young or sheltered. Mean looks are the least of it. I've had cops called on me because I "look" mean...I was in physical pain 💀. I also cannot stand women in supervisory roles when it comes to moving stuff. "Lady if you've never lifted something this heavy in your life, maybe just help keep the path clear?" Funny how your brother and ex's anecdotes are now valid....but mine are all bad faith... I’m not sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:08 AM
-3

So committed relationship means what? He's not in an asylum is he? That's a bit much even for me. What is with women guards and prisoners? Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:56 AM
1

The moderation here is pretty bad in general. Literal Streisand effect BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:53 AM
3

Sorry about your ex. I can't say what I think here, but you can gather what my views on disloyalty are. I don't f□ck around with that harem shit, my ex tried the open relationship bs too. You can gather how I took that. I hope that you can find your way out of misandry. I meant everything I said here tonight (and a lot more that I can't say). But I wish you well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:42 AM
1

I didn’t mock your friend. I even tried not to comment on the situation much out of respect. I am talking about IRL people, you know people that have influence on your outcomes, the arguments that matter. And don't feed me the respect line, you've already pre-emptively discredited any testimonial evidence I have to say. What groups? Any org to help women? Yes. ALL of them. If men are on average doing worse, and no one gives a shit, then all the special interests need to STFU and stop pulling mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:34 AM
7

You guys just refuse any evidence that is contrary to your beliefs. That is a BIG claim, can I get a peer-reviewed study and a big bottle of lotion so we can all peer-review it together? 🤡 My favorite thing in college was going to a thesis defense in the Gender Studies department.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:52 AM
5

You guys just make claims you can’t back up and frame them as fact. Based on how you are arguing, A woman could walk up to me, kick me in the nuts, leave a bruise, and you still wouldn't believe it. Guys, this is the same woman who seriously maintains that she does not know a single promiscious woman. Not a single one. She is not an arbiter of credibility, in any regard. She claims to be in the tech industry, so I guess the memes write themselves. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:50 AM
1

I’ve seen a red pill guy here claim a study HE brought was biased because I read it and it concluded the opposite of what he thought. Based on your performance thus far, I am inclined to believe you misread it or deliberately misframed the results. Myopic convenience isn't as slick as you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:46 AM
-3

about the expectations that come with it. If you are not having sex, then why are you married? Should be grounds for annulment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:44 AM
1

I brief dozens of cases where women lie about men and then are allowed to keep custody. Thanks for asking. 💀 Cute that you think that family dissolution and paternal estrangement is a joke. Speaks to your general character.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:43 AM
0

Shitty memes are not an argument. Please consult your doctor about the benefits of a vasectomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:39 AM
1

You 100% do referee. Remember when I said I don’t know any promiscuous women and you called me a liar indirectly? Fair. I will be direct then. I don't believe you. That's the whole reason I invoked Mia Khalifa. She was just known. People will continue to ask for sources on these things and you can either suck it up and ignore or pony up. I think you misunderstand. IDGAF about the evidentiary standards of people who routinely go out of their way to discredit everything I have seen or experienced …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:34 AM
1

You’re bad faithed because you routinely say I said things I didn’t because it proves your point. If I have, I am sorry. A lot going on atm. I do think you played fast and loose with your claims about female promiscuity, which led me to see you as dishonest. That necessarily shifted my approach. I have seen appeals to authority abused ad nauseum. I also sincerely do believe in an institutional bias against men, and I perceive a lot of circular logic proppkng that up. I do think women have an iss…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:09 AM
1

There are 0 stakes. There are for me. I actually give a shit, I am not doing this to dunk on women or simpy men. They shouldn’t give af about men, they should be caring about the population as a whole. That would be fine if tax dollars weren't being misappropriated in favor of groups that us. I know I am not the only one done with this. I’m literally writing this stuff without spellchecking in between reading documents Yeah I noticed. Like I said this is just practice for the arguments that matt…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:43 AM
1

If you don’t understand why trust me bro doesn’t work for a survey of half the population, you’re a lost cause. If you don't see how a gynocentrist bias, regulatory capture, and ideological grant based funding can undermine peer reviewed research, then YOU are the lost cause. There is no Diversity of Opinion on the Academic level. What do we know about the incel demographic? We know they are reviled nationally. We know they are deeply angry. We know that there seems to be some barrier to their a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:20 AM
1

I’ve noticed some patterns that you won’t like Name them. You might be surprised with what I agreed with. If you genuinely believed that there was a gynocentric biad All you’re going to do is continue skimming and screaming at the sky about how the big bad misandrist is hurting you Believe it or not, I don't enjoy this. It's practice for the arguments that actually matter, its also valuable to have to contend with opposing opinions in a hostile environment. I don't think that women in positions …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:06 AM
1

You just have to trust me bro, it’s my lived experience. Again, when I make claims I am trying to act in good faith. I am not trying to referee what evidence is valid or not, however I will point out hypocrisy by your side on this point. You don't have to trust me, in fact IDGAF if you do. What interests me are the arguments you use to "negate" what I am saying. Myopic appeals to overtly biased authority is not sufficient to me, sorry. You already are playing fast and loose with "your lived expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:55 AM
1

We’ve already been over this, no one cares what you take seriously. I am not asking for your respect, I am not inclined to think you are a good person. It’s simply not applicable here. Because you decreed it to be not applicable. Nobody appointed you, and I have no reason to take you seriously. Anecdotes can be used as evidence, but this is not a case where that is appropriate. Again, I don't agree and you failed to provide a sufficient reason for me to take this "claim" seriously. I trust my ey…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:39 AM
1

The crazy part is you said you had shit to do but yet you’re still here. Let’s get to work and get off Reddit. My best friend shot himself in the head over bad faith claims made by a woman he was engaged to, do I need peer review for that? I grew up with this kid, I saw how his mother acted, how he was estranged from his biological father, how our primarily female teachers treated him. When am I "allowed" to notice some patterns? I do have better things to do, but I am more than happy to pursue …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:16 AM
1

Stop with the victim complex Right back at you No one cares about what anything means to you, that’s the thing. I don’t respect people with this mind frame in the first place. If you aren't willing to take any testimonial evidence seriously, even as a baseline, why would I take you seriously? Look up what happened to the kids that tried to report on the Franklin Scandal to the FBI. As late as the 2020s, I saw people blowing it off . I take self reporting seriously, I acknowledge the need for cor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:08 AM
3

You’re literally skipping over me saying you need to vet your sources for whatever reason. And you shouldn’t just depend on what someone else concluded, you should look at the actual data yourself. How about you do it? The institutional bias thing is tangential to the central argument, Why would I waste time on someone who is predisposed against testimonial evidence provided by men? Look it up yourself. I am talking about your burden of proof regarding female double-standards of promiscuity. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:00 AM
1

Why did you quote me with the clown emoji at the end? I genuinely don’t get what you’re mocking there. I genuinely do not believe you. You don't know of ONE promiscuous woman? How am I supposed to believe you are credible? She did sex work publicly. Somebody didn't read the full wiki... Isn't having sex publicly an example of promiscuity? You are so bad faith you cannot acknowledge objective facts. 💀 You draw your burden of proof wherever it is CONVENIENT for you. Can you acknowledge the possibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:53 AM
1

No. (But thanks for actually reading it). To be clear, I previously studied what happened to the lobbyists who were working for Big Tobacco...a ton of them (do NOT get me started on Juul and Zyns)...this was NOT an argument. The post 2015-2017 argument was over articles published supporting the claim that Voluntary Circumcision was helping prevent the spread of AIDS. The "science" behind it seemed ludicrous to me. I remember people who worked on the ground telling me that some of these guys were…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:46 AM
1

Mia Khalifa is one person, idk if you know that. Yeah I know & she was an obnoxious piece of work in middleschool. Do you need peer reviewed journals backing that up? Is my assertion still insufficient? Her promiscuity is just public facing, Ms. "And by the way, I don’t sleep around and don’t know any women who sleep around." 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:31 AM
3

Why is your immediate presumption that I am overstating it?😂 I honestly cannot stand people who are SO resistant to the plausibility of institutional bias. We are literally coating national forests in Glycophosphates as we speak. What is burden of proof here? You expect me to just jump through hoops for what? If I brought you 500 anecdotes with corroborating documentary evidence, would that count as "evidence" to you? Where's the line? TBH, most of the jank I have seen is with political polling …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:28 AM
1

Because I actually care about evidence, this was a cursory AI pull, this has not been vetted by me, but I have no reason to doubt it yet. Surgeon General did not say smoking was good for you, but I definitely remember there was a controversy about a prominent doctor that was bought off. I'll have to track down the article at some point. When studying institutional bias, lobbying, and corporate capture, the relationship between the tobacco industry and major medical organizations provides a clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:12 AM
0

No one cares about what anything means to you, that’s the thing. I don’t respect people with this mind frame in the first place. Did I ask for your respect? Or is this one of your daily affirmations in the mirror? Funding =\= bias in all cases by the way Oh so you can acknowledge that funding DOES effect bias some of the time? Just never against men right? 🤡 Link the threads for the aids and smoking arguments, I’d like to see if that’s what they actually said and if the sources were actual duds.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:06 AM
3

Did you peer review that first? Testimonial evidence is used all the time in court. Tell you what. Since you don't believe me, I am more than happy to DM all the corroborating evidence supporting my anecdote about who I went to school with. Its definitely "peer-reveiwed" 🧴🤢. Will that be sufficient to establishing Mia Khalifa's promiscuity, or does some NGO need to pay me first?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:44 AM
4

And by the way, I don’t sleep around and don’t know any women who sleep around. I am sorry WHO is bad faith? I went to school with Mia Khalifa...I must have just hallucinated that right? Gtfo 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:34 AM
1

Wait so its (allegedly) easier for women to catch STIs, but your presumption is that its most likely JUST the men spreading them? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:29 AM
3

STI rates also occur in children, do you want to hear more about this? I hope not. I worked for USAID providing AIDS relief to Africa....so yeah, show your work. The study specified adults starting at 18...so... They could also be monogamous wives who are infected by cheating husbands. Even the study concluded they were all f□cking the same men, that's more evidence of flawed mate selection criteria... TBH I genuinely think you are incapable of recognizing the bias created by institutional gynoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:28 AM
0

You don’t need a Harvard degree to do research bud. Or you at the very least need to reframe your argument. I have literally had people try to cite studies alleging that circumcision prevents transmission of the AIDS virus. Completely oblivious to the people funding the study. (Horrifically bad sampling by the way). If we followed your appeal to authority logic and ignored all available anecdotal evidence, smoking would be seen as good for your health. Your appeals to authority mean nothing to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:14 AM
7

Do you actually not know why having a large pool of data vs “trust your eyes” is better? Lady, I have worked with lobbyists and think tanks, I have seen how the hamburger is made , someone is always paying for these studies (not b/c they love science or for humanitarian reasons). I have had arguments with morons who believe that circumcision prevents AIDS transmission over an Appeal to Authority Bias. Nevermind that the money came from an ideological NGO... I have seen regulatory capture in real…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:02 AM
2

What does accountability look like to you? This is ancient history, but this is what accountability looks like to me: My 10 yr LTR failed for a lot of reasons. I prioritized her needs instead of dealing with the career/health/educational issues. I should have been my focal point, I ignored already saw us as getting married. I was naive about the nature of love in general, I projected my own "blue pill" values onto her. I prioritized acts of service over setting boundaries and keeping track of wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:41 AM
-2

Also, I have never touched TikTok, I interact with the Family Courts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:19 AM
0

because she is over 30 and therefore must be a whore. The only reason I would see myself tossing this hypothetical nice girl (out of hand) is if she showcased a lack of accountability regarding her past or if I was in a position to build a family. (In vitro failure rate/geriatric pregnancy complications speak for themselves). This is not said to be cruel, but to be honest about what most men want out of relationships (your outlier anecdotes not withstanding). The unspoken truth is that a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:10 AM
0

HR ladies are Jezebelles? If not that, overt misandrists. Seriously, society would be better if we got rid of all HR departments. (I say that as someone that worked with HR ladies).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:07 AM
2

Under rated comment
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:05 AM
-1

It's a revenge fantasy they have for promiscuous women "I think people should be held accountable for their actions and avoid hypocrisy," = "Grr, I hate promiscuous women." What is it that Gen Z says? "Okay Gooner."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:59 PM
1

These red and black pilled dudes can only see the world and people via projection. Does this count as projection inception? As the saying goes "speak for yourself." Frankly, you aren't qualified to speak for me or people like me. Case in point: They didn’t get hookups in their 20s so they resent women because they believe that all women would be doing what they wish they could have done. I got hookups in my twenties, I am still disgusted by hedonistic women who make hypocritical misandrist state…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:56 PM
0

How do you know that? Aggregated (almost universally experienced) trend analysis. If an entire cohort of people claims to have experienced something it is incredibly suspicious to just write it off as "nah they are all stupid/wrong." Its funny how often a bunch of people attesting to something (Franklin Scandal ; Little St. James) are just written off by people in favor of a conveniently myopic status quo. I have often wondered if why the Franklin Scandal was so under-reported was because the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:47 PM
5

i am not arguing, i am simply telling you your post doesn't resonate with me. So, by your "logic", if I dislike soccer I should just wander up to a sports bar and announce that IDGAF to people watching the world cup? Also do you usually feel motivated to comment on things that "don't mean anything" to you? Seems like it resonated on some level, otherwise why waste the time to comment upon it? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:27 PM
1

"After their twenties." LMFAO do you live under a rock?!?! Almost every normal young man does this bahahaha If I do, maybe you should find one yourself, might learn basic reading comprehension. The emotional tenor of your reaction is suspicious to me..."Methinks the lady doth protest too much?"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:18 PM
1

I know they are women you work with not friends, and from other posts in this thread you asked them out and were rejected. Translation: "You got dumped one time, so your comment about literally being stabbed in the back by an ex wife has no merit 'incel'." Bad Faith Ad Hom is not an Argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:14 PM
2

Sure. You did For all we know you are commenting from basement on an island, this is not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:13 PM
4

i don't care because this post doesn't describe me or the people i know. maybe get a different social circle Solipsism is not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:12 PM
2

One of the more common arguments against discussing these gender trends with women (in general) is that they tend to filter all evidence against a solipsistic framework. (I never experienced this, and its not emotionally convenient, ergo all men are lying).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:08 PM
2

Why assume it's the same people other than to say "women bad"? Why assume that we are assuming? Our view is built upon aggregated and corroborated empirical evidence (viewcounts) that point to women engaging in this double standard. I can speak for myself, family members, friends, men and women who can all attest to this behavior. You are free to be skeptical, but at some point your failure to provide a concrete burden of proof for our claims just looks like bad faith framing of our ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:06 PM
1

How do you know that none of the formerly promiscuous women criticize men for seeking casual sex? Virtually every former porn star that I know of has engaged in this character laundering & correlated misandrist denigration at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:02 PM
1

What do you think dating is? Adversarial job interviews/unregulated personal marketing. Given the extraordinary standards men are held to, it behooves the man to vett everything said against available evidence and evinced behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:00 PM
7

Idk if a study has been made on it and I'm not basing my opinion on that. Then why should your view be treated with any credibility? I just saw a Feminist whining about anecdotes not being evidence, I don't fully agree, but why shouldn't we hold you to the same evidentiary standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:58 PM
1

more counterintuitive point? More counterintuitive in relation to what? Look up the gender disparity in the rate of STIs between men and women, that alone disproved your unsubstantiated assertion. (Oh, I guess someone thinks downvoting is an argument? 😘)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:56 PM
-1

Female principles appear to be largely defined by their social cliques, even if a woman does not evince the promiscuous behavior of others in their cohort, their continued association can be extrapolated to be a form of tacit endorsement. The same "functional" inductive reasoning can applied to associations with women who engage in misandrist rhetoric at their personal convenience. If someone is okay with bad behavior in theory, there probably isn't a lot holding them back from engaging with bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:54 PM
8

I prefer to refer to "Women, in aggregate" to avoid this kind of venal pedantry. If the majority conforms with a rule to the extent that it remains a majority intergenerationally, I think it is safe to opine that such a rule should be applied to your subset of "available" women, in aggregate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:47 PM
-1

The only men I have known to engage with this "recreational" fucking after their twenties were doing so because they were conditioned into being an avoidant by the women they were dating. Ergo, who is actually preferring this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:45 PM
1

Lmaooo “I made a post for a circlejerk of 12 other men who are just like me, I’m definitely right” I have sincere doubts about the quality of the sex lives for anyone that regularly comments here regardless of affiliation. Even tangential interest in this subject matter "begs the question" as they say. (Downvoting is not an argument 😘).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:42 PM
0

AI that shit bruv, (Data Validate of course).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:40 PM
3

All empirical evidence is predicated upon "scientifically" aggregated anecdotes. So do you have anything to contribute besides "Don't Trust Your Lying Eyes?"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:39 PM
3

My point is that when I was in school, it was part of the curriculum. That IS a form of tacit acceptance. Feminism is like Hepatitus, just because not every strain will kill you, doesn't mean that it is actually good for you. I see it as another form of Blank Slate Utopianism, it seeks to reprogram the parts of human nature which are hard wired by evolution and genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:16 PM
1

In all seriousness. Speaking as a putative "conservative" guy, you might like Alistair <https://youtube.com/@alistairianism?si=TQd8YGsBQhNZ_PkM > He started as a right wing libertarian, but he is more economically 'progressive," and resonates with me as a man (where I am at). He is not an intersectionalist so he actually cares about people writ-large.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 07:08 PM
1

I am not unsympathetic to your view. There should be a distinction drawn between what is representative per capita vs what is ideologically "authentic." (Although I wouldn't necessarily conflate media's astroturfed prominence with actual per capita representation either). Hassan is conflated with Progressivism because of the size of his viewership, just as Andrew Tate is conflated with RP because of the size of his viewership. Its just one of those things, and its why botting & catfishing was su…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 06:33 PM
1

Ok, amd in general, women all have a different desire for men. The only statistically relevant selection criteria are the ones that lead to breeding and family formation. Anything else is pricing yourself out of the market. Ex: You can want a conventionally attractive 90's style goth chick all you want, that doesn't mean that they are a statistically relevant portion of the population (or that they are stable enough to form a family unit with - just ask Tectone). Also you should look up the evol…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 06:10 PM
1

We are enslaved by our "conveniences."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:54 PM
1

I think this is more difficult for men than for women in many ways because of patriarchal norms. Really? You don't think mainstreaming "affirmative" gender discrimination had any effect on male outcomes? 😂 I get so tired of the Utopian Blank Slate Psychobabble. Evolutionary Psychology addresses a lot of this. Mating Behaviors are not rational, they are hard-wired instincts we assign post hoc rationalizations to. Ask any girl that's happy in a relationship, once you spend 30 minutes sifting throu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:48 PM
1

Guess what? Black women exist, too….crazy, right? Really? You think we forgot? Idpol is only shoved in our face every 15 minutes Example: "Why do you care about Black Helen of Troy or Eliot Page Achilles?" Because its a form of deliberate cultural subversion? Hating White People and/or Men is not a Civic Virtue.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:43 PM
1

They are more representative than you want to admit. Subreddit rules notwithstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:39 PM
1

They aren't breeding with bishojo twink models IRL, so its not statistically relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:33 PM
1

I hate having progressive values because I get associated with dumb regressives who think openly displaying a lack of empathy is helpful to anyone. Can you really call it an outlier if that's what's being elevated in the mainstream discourse? Hassanabi's "Why should incels want fatherhood if they'll never experience it?" comes to mind. Grant you, I am not unsympathetic to the No True Scotsman astroturfing of ideology, I just don't see "reasonable" progressivism IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:29 PM
4

I’d argue that progressive spaces hurt men more in application than in ideology Respectfully, I don't think you have done the reading. Dworkin's "Erect Phalluses are Violence against Women," is a particularly hilarious example. For all the lambasting of their strawmanned "Patriarchy" I would argue that Gynocentrism has done more damage to society writ large than "muh Patriarchy" ever did.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:27 PM
1

"Society" is never going to respect soft men, its just going to try to destroy and replace them. Its basic Evolutionary Psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:11 PM
2

What would ‘valuing men as men’ look like? Honest question. Idpol is a literal psyop targeted at subverting the middle class from uniting over monopolistic practices, price fixing, and parasitic rent seeking behaviors. (Transactionmaxxing is not the same as increasing productivity.) I am conservativish, but the leftwing guy Alistair on YT really captures the heart and soul of the economic side of it. ≈=========== ATM, Virtually every issue that caters to young men is captured by right wing popul…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:10 PM
2

I agree. As an individual though, I am just not into "masculine" type of dudes. Let me stop you right there. When men are talking about women, they tend to be speaking in aggregate, as in "this is true of women in aggregate." No matter how unique an individual fish is, no successful fisherman goes out with techniques catered to one specific fish, they go out with techniques targeted at specific groups of fish. "But not me" is anecdotal and not really useful to men trying to find a woman worth bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:58 PM
1

I am not hating on them, they are my favorite "enemies."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 02:21 AM
1

I am not saying whether or not to date them, I just refuse to define healthy sexual relationships according to their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:41 AM
1

Nope, definitely defective from an evolutionary perspective, and genuinely useless from a biological one. It's like someone born without legs trying to coach me in long distance running.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:13 AM
1

No, I understand that defective people exist, I just don't use outliers to define norms or standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:03 AM
1

So you are from a commonwealth country. That explains a lot. Come on little "sheilah," you'll figure it out eventually. Maybe if you read more, you'll figure out something to say: https://youtu.be/IFACrIx5SZ0?t=28&si=hoZK1KuSq5WS3XMD It's so precious how you lack the basic self awareness to be embarrassed, "you go girl!" 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:53 AM
1

You can barely speak English apparently😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:41 AM
–

In fact, people who chase validation are typically annoying and labelled having MAIN CHARACTER SYNDROME. Southpark actually did a some episodes about it. Watch The F Word. 😂 South Park? seriously? We are talking about value in relationships, not personal value. Is that what we're calling men who do more than think with their penis? Really? Maybe you'd know if you weren't too busy citing slop writing as actual evidence? Why don't you try looking it up? It's like trying to explain the tides to a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 11:31 PM
–

Women are always so obsessed with eating and garbage media. The ones that actually have stimulating thoughts and hobbies, have psychiatric disorders. It's like when a woman starts talking about a dream she had, and it is the most mundane boring shit I have ever heard in my life. Like so bad you want go buy her an audible subscription, and put headphones over her ears while she is sleeping just to make her dreams have better pacing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 11:23 PM
1

Commenting on a statement that has a worse shelf-life than milk at room temperature makes me a "weirdo?" Maybe focus on saying something which retains its value after a week? Would you care about the opinion of a shit-throwing chimpanzee? Would it give you an existential crisis? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 11:07 PM
2

Most men would get extremely offended if you assumed that was sex Its both physical and emotional validation, your rhetorically convenient myopia must prevent you from seeing that. Most men DONT like that stereotype you're promoting and know that stereotype gets used to demonize men. More blank slate utopian bs, sometimes arguing with your "side" feels like I am arguing with flat earthers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 11:01 PM
–

Then rewrite them without the "woe-is-me" and "Men can't be expected to do much" sexism. I am not "woe is meing" I am saying you and most women generally, literally have empathy blindspots when it comes to men. That's not moralizing, that's responding to observable patterns of behavior. I don't lose sleep over moronic behavior, I do try to help if I can, but I wash my hands of stupidity at the end of the day. I am. What is Tabula Rasa then? What is the Blank Slate Theory? Trying to "logic" men o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:16 PM
–

You aren't listening. Engage with the points that were made. Men and women are both subject to a degree of biological determinism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:09 PM
–

That's EXTREMELY sexist to assume all men act in a way that makes everyone hate them. I don't care about your perception of my conception of reality, I care about the material facts. "Modern" Women like to maximize their own hedonic interests at the expense of men or are too solipsistic to see what the consequences of gender discrimination policies actually are. (that's just modern Feminism essentially). There also is a Malthusian Eugenicist trend among the elites, but that's outside the scope o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:03 PM
2

Honest about what? That's the part that is poorly formulated. Also what exactly are men not clear about regarding their needs? Is it the tacit need for sex you are talking about? If so, the only reason that men don't communicate that overtly is because it isn't considered "sexy" to women to be so blunt. Most guys who get action aren't trying to embody the "show bobs and vagene" meme. Because attraction is predicated upon kindling a natural "friction" between you two. That's where Tinder's brandi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:49 PM
2

So, you WANT women to assume most menace purely sex motivated? Lol, "menace" is obviously an autocorrected Freudian slip. You clearly have some kind of hang up with sex. Sexual relationships are inherently predicated upon a basis of mutualistic & reciprocal sex. If a man is committed to a relationship with a woman he wants to invest in this wonderful person who makes him feel valued. For men this is slightly more physical than emotional, but we need both just like women. If we didn't need the wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:38 PM
2

Your problem lies in the fact that men don't actually want to be married though. Western secular marriage is not marriage, it's just a bad contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:24 PM
1

Sexual relationships are usually predicated upon some measure of sexual activity. Hence the name.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:22 PM
2

The problem with that is that men here admit they wont admit they dont want a relationship because they know damn well how their chances drop in dating. This is obviously some sort of strawman, but its so poorly articulated that I genuinely don't understand what you are trying to say...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:21 PM
2

The guy is dumb because he really thought that’s a good reason to get married. The woman is dumb because she doesn't understand how men are motivated to maintain performance within the relationship. Also this only applies to secular marriage which has no principles outside of emotional convenience and hedonic utility. It's like playing Russian Roulette without any payout at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:19 PM
1

damn bro folded by deleting his acc rq You don't have a debate about hygiene with a chimpanzee throwing feces at your face. Sure the chimp thinks its "owned" you by getting you to leave, but at the end of the day...alienating the only people that give a damn is going to bite them in the ass when the loggers come to cut everything down.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:17 PM
–

When guys here talk about dating being a numbers game. They sound like compulsive gamblers too. You've clearly never been to the finance sector
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:11 PM
–

Going with the analogy, the guys I’m talking about will keep fucking up their job interview until they realize there’s zero job offerings left for them and then they’ll panic cry and say it’s the job market‘s fault. And then wanna get pity about how hard it is for them to find even a single job. If the job market is explicitly discriminatory against men and actively seeks to displace them through exploiting migrant workers and AI, then most men are going to check out. If the job market then beco…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:07 PM
–

I never said that was what I wanted.... The act of going on dates is a ritualistic feeding activity for people with nothing else going on.... I am talking about the actual give and take in longterm dating. The messy work that makes a relationship work. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 08:46 PM
–

Reciprocity is not Transaction
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:16 PM
0

“He must think I’m going to be a bang maid. A cook. A baby incubator. A submissive house elf who defers to his Lordship.” Based on that definition of it, to women it sounds like a threat or prison sentence. Oh so you really like Handmaid's Tale?💀 Also I have never heard of ANYONE who wants to bang a House Elf, that is naaaaasty gurl. Also WITAF is a Bang Maid? The French Maid is a peak aesthetic and you know it. ....wait are you saying women don't like furnishing clean spaces to live in, or is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:40 AM
1

Challenging the OP's view means there should be some way to convince him that it should be easy to sympathize with most of women's dating woes. I literally did just that. Thanks for showcasing the lack of reciprocity when it comes to giving and receiving empathy. Personal feelings are not debatable. Except, we are discussing his worldview, not personal feelings. These perspectives are shaped by interpretations of experiences he has had. These CAN be shaped by appeals to reason You (and women lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 05:14 PM
1

This “men are the victim” is getting so exhausting because men really aren’t a victim they are just experiencing the bare edges of equality and they don’t like it Adorable,"bare edges" and all. Go lay down if you're "tired" no one is forcing you to be here. If an artificially altered heuristic is skewed to prejudice the majority of women against 80% of men, then that is a literal example of systemic discrimination against men. (This is just in terms of 'attraction.') Regarding Systemic Discrimin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:54 PM
0

I think it is debatable, you just don't want to engage with it, which begs the question, why comment upon it? It speaks to the broken nature of society that women can so stubbornly hold to their refusal to empathize with men, and it creates a problem for men. Do we reciprocate the disrespect or do we try to find a way to build rapport with people who think that misandry is a civic virtue? To OP: I would argue that there are women out there that you can sympathize with on some level, who genuinel…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:46 PM
1

I agree with what someone is saying, doesn't mean I idolize them. I don't like influencers, drifters, and coaches. Doesn't change when what they say is factually correct. Gynocentric Simps are more dangerous and culturally corrosive than anything they have said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 03:43 PM
5

Not really. Any "panicking" occurs after you realize the cultural blindspot exists, once you realize it cannot be fixed, you can come to terms with civilizational collapse. We are speed running the mouse utopia experiment at terminal velocity. People who are too solipsistic to pay attention will maintain their delusional "status quo" until the collapse occurs. The hedonistic crowd is too busy chasing that validation high to pay attention to what happens to the economy when your social entitlemen…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:55 PM
1

Slutshaming is a form of attack. Attacks are harm causing. Articulate the "harm." If you are referring to harassment, I would be inclined to agree, but it depends on where you draw the line. Not sure what you are referring to re: disagreement If you are inclined towards "playing the victim," you could argue that someone disagreeing with you would approximate a harm. (Similar to criticizing Israel yielding accusations of Anti-Semitism, but on Gendered Grounds).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:34 PM
1

You sure use a broad brush champ. Hope you find happiness one day I am content, people who chase happiness at the expense of stability, are most likely chasing a high.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:33 PM
1

Some of those high trust societies can be downright hostile tbh. I never claimed perfection, I claimed stability. People over-prioritize "niceness" and "comfort." Personally I think having diversity is good because it prompts people to learn and grow in ways I value, I don't like it when there is failure to police, adjudicate, or punish sexual abuse crimes because a certain "community" has been given unearned privileges to cater to unsubstantiated sanctimonious feelings. , but with that can come…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:32 PM
1

There is a difference between shaming a behavior than denigrating a person. I lean towards generalized criticism unless they lean into the ad hom.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:27 PM
1

Disagreement is not harm, your wold view is immaterial. Physical assault is obvious harm. Emotional abuse gets into gray areas depending upon how it is defined.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:24 PM
0

Did you think you were doing something profound here or are you just now realizing that your response was ridiculous, given the context? Your inability to grasp what I was trying to say is not my problem. Also I am not debating to win you over, I am showcasing the misalignment between temperaments and perceptions between our "sides." Food for thought Thanks, but I'd rather not "starve." Regarding "slut shaming," I differentiate between shaming behaviors and people. I tend not to direct it "at" a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:20 PM
1

Men wanting sex for a sandwich is far more prevalent Unrepresentative sample, basic math shows that most men are not in the relationship category, hence the bad actors sample is as unrepresentative as it is exclusive. I am guessing you are older than the peak fertility "cohort," so "Boomer" relationship problems don't interest me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:14 PM
1

What happened with the water bottle? Herpes? Vanishingly unlikely but again: negligence. Mono. Re: abortion, I’m all for it. I don’t believe a small bunch of cells is conscious Abortion advocacy trends towards late term inevitably. Anyone paying attention has seen how the messaging accelerated away from the 90 Having protected casual sex isn’t negligent. Unearned qualifier. I never conflated "protected" with "unprotected." Again, contraception trivialized the risk, hence the proliferation of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:12 PM
0

Suuuure bud. You were slut shaming people for their health. Totally believable. 🤣 Two separate things. Not surprised you failed to clock that. PEPFAR was targeted at Africa not Texas, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:07 PM
1

Simping is the status quo...so "yikes" not withstanding, most modern relationships aren't healthy IMHO. Simping is the proximate cause of the birth rate collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:05 PM
1

Number one concern with bodycount is how it impacts long term pairbonding. Regarding sex, it increases the likelihood of STDs or unplanned pregnancy. Pretty Simple Logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:03 PM
1

Verbal attack or fist to the face? Are we talking threatening physical violence or nebulous "emotional violence?"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:01 AM
1

Aggression is not ever to be 'dismissed' by 'get over it' Digression aside, both sides can claim this viewpoint. As a man, the only times I have gotten truly angry is when I catch someone in a lie. It's the ultimate form of disrespect for me, and it changes how I view them. While I would never want to date an overtly promiscuous woman, I definitely would respect them more than the one who lies to me for their personal convenience, because I risk investing in someone who secretly does not respect…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:00 AM
1

. It was pretty obvious that the men doing it were jealous because those women were having the casual sex they wanted and couldn't get ...That's not why I care...how was it obvious? What was your sample size? Other people's insecurities never did and never will affect the choices I make for myself. I literally worked in AIDS relief...there were people pushing circumcisions as a form of AIDS prevention....I used to wonder...why not lead with the condoms? Also...Texas Spring Break had crazy amount…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:55 AM
1

Why do men get so mad when women call them incels? Why do women ask questions they don't care to know the answers to? It comes down to more men caring about what is objectively true rather than what is emotionally convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:50 AM
1

...Does it matter if we go clockwise or counterclockwise? What if we make a square or a rhombus? Is it because of the splash effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:48 AM
1

I mean the per-instance risk of serious harm when precautions are taken. Like shooting blanks on set, except when you take the potential arm for granted and the armorer leaves a real gun. The real negligence of the act is who else it can harm. My whole lacrosse team got an STI from sharing water bottles. (Not me of course). And with abortion you're killing a child out of emotional convenience. But if that kind of argument upsets you, try this one I only get upset when people lie out of convenien…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:37 AM
2

Incels hate women. Incel isn’t about celibacy. Incels aren't really a thing IRL. Most people called incels don't actually see themselves that way. Some of the people who are called incels, are actually having sex. Also misogynists hate women, hating women isn't an essential component of Inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:01 PM
1

A man becomes a new person everytime he walks into a room with new people in it. There are people who live completely segregated lives between who they are online and who they are IRL. Also a person is an ephemeral and changing being, if you've ever gone through a major trauma, its often easier to conceive of your past self as a different person. A lot of people develop a degree of body dysmorphia after they age or go through life altering injuries. A lot of old people think of themselves in an …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:54 PM
2

You just gave the same definition for two different things, that's like a blind person explain the difference in color between apples and oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:46 PM
-2

Another day, another man complains that he can't just sit on his ass and women would come and offer themselves to him (hot women), and call it entitlement of women and unrealistic expectations of men. Thank god we have brave people like you to sit and and provide meaningless commentary instead of addressing the topic at hand or engaging with the rationale behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:43 PM
0

OP is clearly just here to complain, not even sure there's enough in this post to debate. There are pills for that, red ones, black ones...green ones... Just don't take the dog pill, that gave me nightmares. Never could look at Peanutbutter the same way again. We can barely agree on the basics, I think it's safe to say people will continue to do whatever the fuck they want. Not everyone lives in a "Diversity is Our Strength" multicultural shithole, some people live in high-trust homogenous socie…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:41 PM
1

American women really just accept anything including 50/50 dates. Several Qualifiers Needed. Also not accounting for Foodie Calls, Situationships, and other socially retarded modern dating conventions. The women in the country I’m from could and would never lol. In Japan, the astrology girls usually also are really into bloodtype for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:37 PM
0

Nobody just asks someone on a date and they say yes. What happens is that there is some period of talking, ranging from a couple/few days to a couple weeks, in which you both assess whether you even want to go on a first date. Believe it or not, dating used to be semi-normal in the '90s & early 2000s. Comparing that with the social standards of today is ridiculous. Apparently a lot of Gen Z thought massive house parties were "just a movie thing."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:34 PM
1

I’ve never seen a simp "Turns out the real Simp was inside us all along." "Stand by Jasleen" Akash Singh, 2024.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:30 PM
1

Like a mole rat, they are looking for a warm dark place, they can really stick their "head" into.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:23 PM
1

"A Simpanzee is many things, Phallicular, Son of Groin; But here on Reddit, He is Mod." "Lord of the Things," Book VII, Chapter 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:22 PM
0

Some women get off on it in a sadomassochistic sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:16 PM
0

The fact is no one actually has to be an employee. You apply for a job. The employer doesnt come to you asking you to work. I actually think there is some cross over into the labor force when you account for how women are over-represented in Admissions and HR departments. There is a reason why online dating is congruous with the moronic requirements in job listings online. Like the infamous 5-Year Entry Level Ghost Jobs that they put out there to project growth and how that is analogous to women…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:05 PM
1

Dude, you guys are jsur focused on the extremely attractive women you want (or the women you’ve convinced yourselves were average) simps are not an issue for the majority of women. You've clearly never heard of dead bedrooms or all the bitching I've seen online. Behind every intolerable social media addicted thot is a legion of useless pussy worshipping simps. Simps are the ones who validate bad behavior in women and compete with each other over who can give the most in exchange for shitty ROI.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:52 PM
1

I frigging love Epistemology. I could also argue that the alleged "distortions" are more representative of our "true selves."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:45 PM
0

We're talking about wife treatment whoosh you missed the point. Thanks for the irrelevant observation. Right, 90% of American Husbands are overly submissive "SIMPs" to their Wives. Ergo the Traditional Validation-Seeking behaviors of "Wife Treatment" is heavily associated with being a Simp in younger generations of men. Basically, Male enabling proto-cuckhold behavior. Its where men become overly emotional and cloying in an effeminate attempt at keeping a lackluster relationship alive with "chor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:18 PM
1

You can't say simps are thirsty and desperate when your standard for being a simp is "pays for a date" and "acts chivalrous". Simp became a catch-all for male validation-seeking seeking behaviors after emulating the degenerate "romance" genre of the eighties & nineties started yielding suboptimal results. Picture Tom or Grandad from the Boondocks. The Antonym to Pimping. Basically its cringeworthy thinking that presumes that "acting like a gentleman" is going to win over the cynical "village bic…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:06 PM
2

You're overly conflating "Simp" with "Incel."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:46 PM
2

Its a fun house reflection of real life, and is therefore evocative of real things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:44 PM
0

This does not happen lol You clearly haven't seen that video of that single mom bitching about a "first date" with a man who didn't want to buy food for her collection of semi-feral kids. (For context they met online). There was another one where she was bitching about "dusty" men who wouldn't pay for a babysitter or for her nails/hair (which looked awful btw).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:43 PM
2

To me the wife treatment to be honest sounds horrible. Like a man promising to do something but not doing for months. Or demanding dinner. Talking about how he hates me because I nag (even if I don't)... Look up the "overly emotional boyfriend" Brendan Fraser clip from that Bedeviled movie. That's more accurate to what a Simp is. Its cloying, emotionally laden, validation seeking behaviors like blowing up your inbox because he thought you gave him a "look" that one time. Overly submissive, a pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:38 PM
1

Into. What is wife treatment? How men would treat you if they actually respected you. High emotional investment behaviors, not dissimilar to how "Yo Daddy" would act if he hadn't "gone out for the milk" With a Simp, its a man that devalues himself, his time, and his social currency by excessively catering to mediocre pussy. Look up that meme of the Husband Chore Chart were the "reward" for several "gold stars" was a lackluster blow job. He is degrading himself for low ROI. Often correlated with …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:33 PM
3

Dude’s gotta promote his YouTube channel somehow Perfect example of vacuous validation seeking behavior. A key part of Simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:27 PM
-1

Someone that devalues their own social currency through cloying & effeminate validation seeking behaviors, and being overly submissive to women. A practitioner of "Bitch-Think" that relies upon appeals to emotion rather than cold/hard masculine facts & logic. A proto-cuckhold who devalues his own investments in time & resources for mediocre pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:22 PM
5

According to Etymological Research, the modern usage comes from the 1960s and was slang for being excessively submissive to your girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:20 PM
5

In the 1920s, "simp" was a common slang abbreviation for "simpleton," referring to a foolish, gullible, or silly person. It was used generally to describe someone lacking intelligence, rather than strictly in a romantic context. The term appeared in media, including a 1923 New York Times article, often highlighting a "simple" person. In the 1920s, "simp" was a common slang abbreviation for "simpleton," referring to a foolish, gullible, or silly person. It was used generally to describe someone l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:17 PM
-1

Simp is slang for Simpleton, it goes back to at least the 1920s. In modern parlance, it is used to refer to cloying validation seeking & effeminate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:12 PM
1

Being with someone under 6ft is not enough to say that the requirement does not exist. It's called settling, unqualified argument is thereby rejected. It just came up "short" 🤏. A preference can become a requirement at the drop of a hat, and if the majority of single women have that as a filter on a dating profile (and fail to date organically) even a soft preference can become a hard requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:43 PM
1

Most people who encounter bears will encounter black bears. Literally an unearned qualifier. Most people in the world are living in an area where there are no black bears. [China and India] Sloth bears are "on sight" by the way, and the bites have been compared to chainsaw injuries. Even if I grant you the American black bear (I don't), female black bears are less likely to be alone, and male black bears are more likely to engage in predation on people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:40 PM
1

I maintain what I said. It says more about the women that hold these views than the men they are denigrating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:36 PM
1

Then what was the point of your video? Never mind. I don’t care. We’re done here. "I pick the bear" "Okay, show her what she's won" I've literally explained it over and over. You only refuse to see it because living in prejudice is easier for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:35 PM
1

And you’re doing that with insults Its telling when relaying the truth is treated as an insult. Perpetual Victimhood won't save you from the prejudices you've displayed. Good luck navigating life like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:33 PM
1

You’re being obtuse. I’m done wasting my time I highly doubt that, you've wasted so much already. Also, not an answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:31 PM
1

that's not the concern men who say casual sex is bad have. So you deny my existence. Interesting strategy cotton, we'll see how that works out for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:30 PM
0

You don’t have to believe me, this is the internet; I could be a 6’2, 280lb linebacker for all you know. The real question is why would I believe you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:29 PM
2

Unearned Qualifier. Point discarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:28 PM
1

It is if your goal is to have a conversation and be understood by people. As far as I can tell, plenty of people were understanding what I was saying. What doesn't make sense, is what you were trying to do. You were not saying to stop out of kindness, you had nothing to substantively address the points I was making. What you said was deliberately meant to be condescending. I can respect people who disagree with me. I can even respect open hostility for its honesty. But your concern trolling is w…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:35 AM
2

"shaming people for things being easier" The shame comes from the danger and damage to the community at large. Men stepping outside of marriage is bad enough, but women stepping outside of marriage leads to total social anarchy. Women stepping out means that surnames can no longer be used to establish parentage, this increases the likelihood of inbreeding. Also factor in the correlation between increased promiscuity and lowered pair bonding. The more partners you have, the lower the likelihood o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:09 AM
1

The "rationale" I see the same men give behind why it makes sense directly correlates these concepts when there actually isn't any logically coherent reason to do so. Natural selection drives men to ensure that any children they provide for is genetically related to them. I would argue that the "logic" of evolutionary psychology is predicated upon ensuring that their genetic legacy is passed on. Also promiscuous women having children outside of wedlock increases the likelihood of incest overtime…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:00 AM
1

Look I cannot stand crabcakes, (she generally argues in bad faith) but can you elucidate upon how safety is not logical? Are you referring to logical validity, because (as I understand it) that refers to the way premises are arranged to yield a specific conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:42 AM
1

Are you implying that being blind or deaf is an insult. I have "met" blind People on reddit before, they have special technology that reads to them, its very impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:07 AM
1

I was trying to convey that the degree of potential violence is disproportionate to that of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:03 AM
1

Bear attacks are indeed rare and geographically limited. Most women (even the ones that hike/camp a lot) will never see a real bear outside of the zoo. They are meeting one in the hypothetical, arrogance and ignorance notwithstanding. I see more men than that just going to work. If men were as likely to be dangerous as the hypothetical suggested then you should not have made it to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 06:17 AM
1

So your “evidence” is an angry bear? How often are you "angry" when you bite into a hamburger? The worst bear attacks don't have an overt sign of a ggression. Even a minimally informed person would know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 06:15 AM
1

What do you mean by "most?"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:51 AM
0

That said, I’ve never once cheated in my life. 🤷🏼‍♀️ How many women would say different even if they did cheat? Its why demonstrated promiscuity is so key. If a woman will sleep with you on the first date, it shows she has a lower barrier to entry and is a higher liability for infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:41 AM
1

It's not. The military standards for combat roles in the US is the same for men and women. If the standards are the same its because Hegseth explicitly readjusted to the standards set by men. Also the lack of women within combat roles us a tacit admission that they can't meet these standards. Its very convenient how you left that out. Also, regarding cops. Everyone knows that female cops suck at physically subduing suspects and are more likely to use lethal force. They suck at handling stress or…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:31 AM
2

Their inability to be with 6ft plus has no bearing upon the millennial cohort preferences (and the generation below them). Even if they "settle" they often demonstrate their disdain for the men they are with in a multitude of ways. Look at the changing birth rates and marriage rates across the generations. That is unequivocally trending down. There’s nothing disingenuous about pointing out that most women don’t require a man to be 6’+. Again, being with a man under 6ft doesn't remove the require…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:25 AM
2

They made a specific claim and you responded with an anecdote about something completely different. Your opaque useless comment not withstanding, he replied with an appeal to evidence, which you just refuted out of hand. Despite the fact that the comment he was responding to overtly asserted that most "women do not prefer x" and didn't even back it up with an appeal to lived experience. Not only are you wrong, but once again you have engaged in bad faith and have failed to substantiate your clai…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:14 AM
2

But most women don't require men to be 6'+. Based on WHAT? If 90% of a userbase sets their preference for being 6ft plus, does that count? Hell, if it was only 51% that set that preference as a standard, then it would still count as "most." However your assertion that "most don't require x" has come out of nowhere. For all we know it could have been pulled out of someone's ass. It certainly smells like shit when compared with the lived experiences of a lot of different men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:08 AM
2

You didn't actually counter anything they said lol. The inability to perceive a truth is only evidence that your faculty of perception is insufficient for detecting it. You may say "There is no Tiger because I do not see it." However claiming this whilst closing your eyes doesn't prevent the Tiger from jumping up and mauling your face. You may stubbornly insist that the evidence he has provided is untrue, but your refusal to see the obvious doesn't prevent it from being true. We've all seen thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:59 AM
2

There are SO many women who knowingly fail to disclose they have an std.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:48 AM
0

Gross for engaging in it frivilously without properly vetting your partners first.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:47 AM
-1

Having sex isn't moral rot, it's human and it should be something that's fun. It's not the sex its the qualifier before it and the context surrounding it. We all agree that nonconsensual sex is wrong because of the negative effects. Promiscuous sex can be argued to be bad too for the negative effects that resulted from it. You just don't because you're artificially distanced from most forms of consequences that result from it. (Except when you're not). Look up that poor schmuck from Spring Break…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:43 AM
2

And the risks are mainly to the participants. Babies? Accidentally Spreading STDs? Emotional convenience doesn't efface uncomfortable truths.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:40 AM
1

It’s about women having casual sex. If it can result in an abortion then the act is not casual, the actors are simply frivolous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:38 AM
1

You can continue missing the forest for the trees by yourself, I have more interesting uses of my time How VERY interesting. If you genuinely did not care about what was being discussed, if you truly thought that my counterfactual on fucking fat fucks was irrelevant, then what compelled you to respond? Engagement in any conversation involving the disgust over hyperpromiscous women showcases that you genuinely care on some level. You may hem and haw, but if you were genuinely indifferent to the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:34 AM
1

The idea that talking about anything at all must always convey personal investment is false. You've been commenting in these threads for a very very very long time. Your continued participation is evocative of the fact that you do care what people think about this on some level.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:23 AM
1

Your anecdote doesn't mean anything to me, Your inability to perceive a truth says more about your faculty of perception than it says about the nature of the truth itself. relevance to the point of my comment The arguments you have attempted to advance are predicated upon an improperly framed hypothetical. It is logically incoherent. You are appealing to relativistic standards when the context shows an objective reality you are refusing to contend with. You ultimately DO care what people think, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:18 AM
1

No one said anything about "morbidly obese" Ah, but YOU just did as everyone can see. Checkmate Feminist. There are degrees of sexual preference when it comes to fatness in women, but in aggregate the data is clear. No one enjoys fucking a TRULY fat fuck. Also I stand by all the other aspects of my comment which you have carelessly disregarded. Even in countries where being FAT is conflated with wealth, no one without degenerate sexual preferences is enjoying sex with a person shaped like an ovo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:07 AM
3

Philosophy applies to any discussion where concepts are being discussed, your demonstrated inability to engage with the subject matter is indicative of your inability to engage in good faith. I genuinely believe the world would be better off if people who shown to have argued in bad faith were forced to get tattooed on their forehead, so everyone could ignore everything they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:01 AM
2

This is not a conversation centered on philosophy. We're not discussing concepts. Oof. I am sorry but literally EVERYTHING you've been discussing is predicated upon concepts. It doesn't matter if I start from a preference as long as the structure of the argument holds. I think you'll find most (properly) educated people prefer a system of empiricism that directly addresses falsifiable claims. Circular "preference" logic is seen as someone sticking their own head up their posterior. They aren't i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:58 AM
2

Listing a bunch of random quotes without context hasn't really refuted the points he has been making. Its okay to admit when you're wrong, feel free to go outside and take a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:47 AM
1

Of course it does. In poor countries, being overweight is a social status symbol Even if a fat person is seen as wealthy, that doesn't mean that they are seen as pleasant to fuck. Which is kind of the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:43 AM
1

In wealthy countries being fat is considered gross regardless of your personal level of income or status, regardless of your "access to food." Weird thing to focus on, but I have spent time with people from multiple countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, India, Africa, Australasia, and South America. Being morbidly obese has always been perceived as disgusting and evocative of a slovenly disposition in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:41 AM
1

No, he was right about the Military, Firefighters, and Police.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:37 AM
1

Wrong. You were right and he/she* was wrong. You weren't wrong about firefighters, because even when they have unisex standards, the women have been usually relegated to support roles engaging in activities which naturally have higher requirements for physical labor and exertion. (The only exception I can think of has been the most recent California wildefires which didn't have enough men to go around due to discrimination in hiring practices). I know these double-standards from conversations I …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:37 AM
1

California female fire fighters were lambasted after tacitly and explicitly admitting that they were incapable of carrying an incapacitated man out of an exigent circumstance. You'd have to be wholly disingenuous not to acknowledge a strength differential when both groups are compared side-by-side. I also noticed that when they use convicts to fight wildfires, they never seem to use convicts from female prisons. Why do you think that is? To bastardize & paraphrase past comments you've made, "its…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:28 AM
1

This is genuinely embarrassing. I hate to invoke it, but you have truly embodied the dunning-kruger effect in this thread. Hegseth has been pretty clear in the past that he doesn't like women in combat roles, because they have been consistently shown to be a liability in combat scenarios. All female combat units consistently are grossly ineffective in combat scenarios, coed units are hampered because the men are picking up their slack, and all male units tend to perform at a much higher level. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:21 AM
1

Anecdotal nonsense Agreed, the "bear' side of the argument is wholly predicated upon the useless anecdotes of myopic women with limited life experience. Everything I have added here that you deem out of scope is intended to flesh out the recklessly disregarded data. It's more indicative of the indidividual women themselves than men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:05 AM
1

I was civil. Be fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:41 AM
1

You’re not presenting evidence, you’re outsourcing your argument to links. It is evidence of the delusional standards being applied. Your inability to grasp it or substantively engage with it is immaterial. Unironically, this is how I perceive the co-related "Men are inherently dangerous" argument. https://youtu.be/DSWVCuMvHPo?si=If7eAO6dEzbOVSQx
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:37 AM
1

Downvoting is not an argument bro, its fine when accompanied with an argument, but without it, it is more evocative of emotional incontinence. Thanks for demonstrating my point about histrionic modes of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:21 AM
2

The definition in Merrimack Webster indicates subordinate and inferior are synonyms. It’s the first definition. Cute. Overtly over-reductive, but cute. In the military, there are objective precedents for when disobedience is theoretically "allowed," because tactical realities sometimes supersede the orders that have been handed down. There's an expectation of trust that you want to have with the person leading you, where you expect them to value your survival. The exception indicates that someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:18 AM
1

make up a dozen new rules and caveats for why those don’t count. Your examples were inadequate for addressing what I was saying. The point was to demonstrate the flaws in your thinking, which you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:10 AM
1

Except the ones who don’t do that? Again, speaking about men in aggregate. Men are hardwired to be disturbed by the sounds of women and children in distress. The predatory ones are an exception to the rule. That's why they are associated with being atypical.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:09 AM
1

You asked me to “name one” and I easily cited 5 across many eras in western history. Distinguishing between aggregated attributes and competencies doesn't speak to a designation of women being "inferior." Also this is not Germaine to the topic at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:06 AM
1

Some men do actually hate women and really do suck. The hypothetical was out of a set of all men vs all bears and which it would be safer to be around in a survival scenario. Human beings are pack animals, that's why we are wired to care about social exclusion so much. Its also why men reacted so strongly, there is something deeply wrong with a community where women are this distrustful of men. Whether they are behaving like this as a form of signaling or if they genuinely believe this, it shows…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:05 AM
1

I don't think you're a bigot necessarily, your behavior and bad faith framing of the issue is just consistent with the definition of one. I even told you to watch videos and read articles where women talk about this issue Men are the most dangerous in metropolitan areas where women have the most power. This isn't a coincidence and is more emblematic of the kinds suicidal empathy and aversion to accountability in gynocentric cultures. High Diversity-Low Assimilation begets low trust cultures. Its…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:55 AM
1

Cry about it, predator. The only "crying predators" I have met have been women. The truth is men are dangerous and make women feel unsafe. Performative signaling aside, if this were true then the majority of women should be on anti-psychotics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:47 AM
1

I'd pick a bear over you. You seem crazy. And super ultra needy. Incel vibes. What exactly would I need from someone like you? Genuinely curious. Men suck as a whole. Men as a whole are unsafe. I don't know any women besides pickme's that deny this. If men as a whole were unsafe, then you'd be unable to go outside in whatever overpopulated shithole you're from. I don't know any woman who talks about "pickmes" who would actually be useful in a survival scenario. Doesn't mean I would right off a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:44 AM
1

and you still disagree with my assessment that what you were doing was unhealthy? If you're regularly engaging and having to argue against people who are hostile, mendacious, and conniving, then yes this exercise can be useful to me. Based on your demonstrated behavior, you fall right into this category.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:40 AM
1

I think you're taking the whole thing too literally. If there is no room for literal interpretation then you're not saying anything rooted in reality. You are extremely emotional and it's been obvious in just about every comment you've made. Prove it. This is super weird. Compared to what? Your metric for what is normal is myopic and irrelevant to me. You already have demonstrated that you "don't get it," you've admitted as much yourself, so why would it hold any intrinsic value? Being condescen…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:35 AM
0

The OP topic that I’ve been talking about: "in-group sensationalism and overdramatization" Unaccountable people are more prone to in-group sensationalism and overdramatization, because they are emotionally incontinent. Sorry I had to hold your hand, but its okay if you don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:25 AM
0

Ah yes I can clearly see your posts are only about objectivity and not emotion. Irrelevant snark aside, I never claimed to be a Vulcan. I try to argue the facts as best I can on issues which I think matter. I try to avoid getting emotional myself because I see it as being detrimental to my performance and objectivity. Women are never conditioned out of this behavior growing up, so they often default to appeals to emotion or through character assassination. Maybe there is a biological component t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:23 AM
1

You handwave centuries to cherrypick examples that highlight differences which you conflate with superiority. The best ones you found were a fat German Heretic and a witch hunter (Malleus Malificarum does arguably describe some unspoken negative female characteristics), they would hardly be "representative" of men's attitudes towards women in the day to day. All men naturally love women and want to protect them, its the modern world that has destroyed that through mass migration and reckless soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:12 AM
0

I was busy, and her examples conflated observed aggregated differences as the same as saying women are inferior. If you had to move a heavy couch, would you be more likely to call a man or woman? I have never seen a woman who was as proficient at manual labor as a man. They are very good at "working" in air conditioned administrative office jobs, but anytime I've been forced to work with them in hard-core physical labor, they gas out. I have seen female "movers," they mostly run their mouths and…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:05 AM
2

Moral Equals does not mean social equals. No man would doubt the intrinsic value of a woman, he just wouldn't judge her by a male metric. Saying something is different isn't the same as saying something is inferior. Men and women have different competencies. Being subordinate in situations does not automatically equate to being inferior. If you were in the military, you'd know this, you salute the rank not the man. Why are you denigrating women for their ability to create and shape children? A g…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 12:52 AM
1

I am in my 30s and I vet the f*ck out of everyone I am interested in. TBH, I could never do the "casual" thing very well in my 20s, I take people seriously and if they are frivolous about the people they are with, then I assume they are too dangerous to attach myself to. I am pretty upfront about what I think, and am pretty harsh on myself and others. But, I don't hate them, because I am careful to not fully invest in them. Life is hard enough as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:04 PM
1

I wish we could actually do something about it. In the 80s and 90s we used to have the mall. Bars are okay but I have seen too many bar fights.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:53 AM
1

It genuinely doesn't bother me after a while, you get used to the malaise. I apologize if I was too acerbic, but I am trying to build up my ability to navigate caustic environments like this. Its my calling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 12:31 AM
1

Why do you think I'm pretending? I genuinely don't think it's healthy to rage in reddit for an entire sunday. There's nothing weird about my opinion that. Its both condescending and useless to me. I am aggressive in how I prosecute an argument, but I am not "raging." I am doing this because I am a true believer, because I feel ethically compelled to take the "fight" to people like this, and its a useful exercise for me because I need to be able to argue to malicious ideologues like this. lmao ??…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:30 PM
3

I have lived as a pariah. Validation doesn't mean anything to me, because I never really had it in the first place. Honestly the people who fixate on how other people perceive them seem trapped by the perceptions they are trying to curate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:54 PM
1

Bars and Professional Associations, you know actual career focused networking? You missed the most important ones. Third spaces are drying up for men, not that you'd be capable of giving a shit. "Try again"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:48 PM
1

I asked a really simple and easy question. Tell me what I said that was done in bad faith. Pretending to give a shit about my mental health, its overt condescension. You clearly don't care about the flair, looks like a shitty pun, so your material sucks. And you don't appear to care about the topic at all. Hence, why I think you're a troll. Which is honestly fine. I don't come here for positive interactions. Do as you please.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:08 PM
1

That is all impossible for men— there is no way to predict whether a man is dangerous at a glance based on either a brief glance at a distance or based on what part of the continent you’re in. That's not entirely true, you can glean a lot by how someone carries themself. By the things they say, don't say, even when they are about to get angry or attack. Its helpful if you've lived through something traumatic, that tends to give you more vigilance in those circumstances. , at a substantial distan…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:04 PM
1

Again, this doesn't make any sense to what I said lol Not my problem. You came just to troll, got it. Doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:00 PM
1

“Several of you”— quote where I did that! It’s bullshit. You blame me for the words of “several of you” as if I’m part of some collective and I’m somehow responsible for the words of others. I did not say the shit you claim I did. You made that up I have literally been having seven different arguments today. Believe what you want. No wonder you feel like such a victim! if you see even one woman write something you don’t like, you immediately blame every other woman on the internet for what she s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:57 PM
1

Quote where you think I denigrated men. You can’t, because you are deliberately lying to make a false accusation. I said most of you, not you yourself. Not a surprise you identify yourself with a dishonest criminal character, really. Gross. Performative outrage notwithstanding, my intentions are pure. The Sopranos reference was in regards to practicing a dialectic in a bad faith adversarial environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:54 PM
1

Then stop responding? "LOL bro, you did this for 12 hrs, this is so unhealthy, so I am going to get sucked into a meaningless back in forth LMAO." Like I said, do as you please.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:47 PM
1

This isn't something you should be bragging about dude lol This isn't about ego for me "dude" I don't care about embarrasment, its something I am compelled to do. If you're not a sockpuppet, you're either a troll or you're here at the behest of someone else. I don't care, do as you please. It doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:45 PM
1

Even if this was true, it still wouldn't make spazzing on reddit for 12 hours a mentally healthy activity. What you deem to be "mentally healthy" is completely worthless to me, as are any other topically irrelevant things you say. You're still not engaging in good faith, and yet you keep commenting like I'll care. I once was on a thread for over a week, I can keep going as long as it takes. At some point you'll be just as "bad" as me, or you'll go do whatever lowtier sadists do for fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:03 PM
1

You haven't changed my position on anything, your lackadaisical affectation is undercut by your continually responses. I could keep saying "I don't care," but you're obviously not paying attention. I don't buy your stated rationalizations at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:57 PM
1

I am not here to argue the motivations behind murdering Emmett Till, I already established it was race primarily and gender secondarily. Hypothetical demographic changes fundamentally change the nature of the inciting crime. I am trying to draw out the analagous logic between the racial prejudices against Till as a Black man and against men in general, because its abundantly obvious that the majority of those arguing in favor of the bear are incapable of entertaining men as victims of discrimina…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:52 PM
1

I'm confused by your responses because they don't seem to relate to anything we're actually talking about. It's like you're having a completely separate conversation. It was patently obvious you're not going to engage in good faith, so I am treating it as an exercise in discerning the "mens rea" element behind your "behavior." So far you're falling into the flaccid category of debaters, you obviously are incapable of contributing anything substantive, so you make sophomoric attempts at rage bait…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:42 PM
1

I am not the kind of person to repeat myself. When I said there is no debate to be had here, I meant it This is a debate sub, you're not credible enough for me to take your little "designation" seriously. Bigots have always had napoleon complexes, doesn't mean I have to validate their bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:36 PM
1

And men can't handle it. The ones that can't handle it, react that way because they were engaging with women in good faith. Of course they dislike being slandered, unlike you, they actually care about what the truth actually is, whereas you are illicitly strawmanning their motivations to fit your fraudulent narrative. At least you're being honest about your innate sadism. You should add a 'Misandrist' flair, its more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:34 PM
1

People are always right to prioritize their safety over the feelings of strangers, ESPECIALLY men. Cute deflection. The hypothetical is about women justifying picking bears over men, and I am gradually establishing that most of you are doing it out of an innate prejudice. Several of you have already slipped up and started denigrating men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:30 PM
1

So no apologies for your lies or for calling all women dishonest manipulators. Why would apologize for something you've illicitly framed? I maintain that those choosing the bear are doing so for prejudicial reasons, and several of you have already slipped up and started denigrating men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:28 PM
1

Seriously, I point out that panda bears are pretty unlikely to kill you, and you threw a fucking hissy fit screaming “misandry!!!” at me. Like, maybe just chill and take a minor pedantic comment with a little less freaking out? I am not freaking out, I am cross-examinining. Its actually quite an enjoyable and useful exercise for me, since you're my ideological opponents IRL too. Its more like Tony Soprano with his therapist for me. The exercise itself is useful, everything else is just pretext. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:26 PM
1

I don’t recall the hypothetical saying I’m blind? Pandas are bears and easily identifiable at a distance, unlike dangerous men. If you're adding qualifiers to the bear and not the man, you're breaking the "randomness" of the hypothetical. Not that I mind, without the "randomness" you're just showcasing your overt disdain for men. Which was the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:22 PM
0

If he were a women and smart talked this particular white woman in this era yes she would have also been punished. The discrimination was predicated upon both race and gender since the justification was the woman's fraudulent claim. It was the central conceit behind the atrocity. Any handringing about alternative genders or race is ultimately moot. The point of invoking race at all was to showcase the analogous logic for choosing the bear in the hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:21 PM
1

I’ve been clear about my point, and you keep rewriting it. You literally began by rewriting the interpretation of what a "man" is, in this hypothetical, I rewatched the video, plenty of women were framing it as "all men." You're overtly wrong. I’m not responsible for how random people phrase things online. You become complicit when you try to justify the "logic" though. Its like writing the preamble to a paper on scientific racism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:17 PM
1

The accusation didn’t kill him. The accusation was the proximate cause of the lynching. Its telling you're already trying to excuse her behavior. And who lynched him? White men. This isn’t “men vs women,” it’s race and power. Women wield power through emotionally manipulating men. She's still guilty. You obviously cannot conceive of a situation where a man is discriminated against on the basis of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:14 PM
1

"Youre not making any sense, so I am just muting you." Again, I literally don't care, not my problem if you can't keep up. Narrowly defining what the tiktokthot hypothetical really means, ignoring the obvious ragebait intention, and disregarding any attempt at establishing an alternative interpretation as "irrelevant" just showcases your innate prejudice against men in general. Its beyond obvious that you cannot conceive of a situation in which a man is discriminated against on the basis of gend…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:12 PM
1

I did answer. Race primarily, gender secondarily, since it all stemmed by a false claim made by a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:02 PM
1

I promise the advice I gave would be very useful for you. Why would I listen to some bystander? Nothing is more useless than unsolicited advice. What? You asked how I knew you had been arguing for 12 hours. Your comment history shows you in this thread responding every 5-10 minutes for 12 hours. Right, and you just interjected out of nowhere for no reason. Like a sock puppet account. That has nothing to do with whether or not it makes sense. Like genuinely what part of my comment was confusing? …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:00 PM
1

Women are saying how they feel and you're trying to argue about it. I am arguing that it showcases that they are more bigoted than they men they are complaining about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:49 PM
1

Sorry if they hurt your feelings. Doesn't mean they're wrong though You haven't hurt anything, I just think they are hiding their innate prejudice against men. Keep leaning into that sarcasm though, really underscores your lack of credibility when you claim that the meme "doesn't really mean anything."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:48 PM
1

Why should I? Its not like you're contributing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:46 PM
1

You’re not responding to what’s being said, you’re trying to make it sound worse than it is. You're either in denial, dishonest, or incapable of grasping the correlations I am drawing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:57 PM
1

The inciting incident was a false accusation from a woman. Cute dodge though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:55 PM
1

You keep arguing against things I didn’t say. At this point, you don’t need me here, you’re just debating your own version of my argument. Pot meet kettle. I don't buy that "man" is perceived as a variable by the way, or that the women articulating their "feelings" on TikTok were adequately distinguishing between "a man," "any man," or "all men."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:54 PM
1

Looking forward to mine. Cheers. 🍻 I genuinely don't get what the other "side" gets out of this debate. I guess when you're propped up by overly censorious moderation, you feel like a big fish in a small pond. To me it just looks like condescending nepo babies bragging about their certificates of completion. You know the LinkedIn guys who are posting inane articles every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:48 PM
1

Or do you want to retract your misogynist claim that women are dishonest manipulators? The subset that are arguing in favor of the bear most likely are. I don't buy the rationalizations about the shitty logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:43 PM
1

did not say all bears are less dangerous than men. I said pandas are. I also didn’t say that “men”, as in “all men” are dangerous at all— you are just fret lying. Pandas are irrelevant to the hypothetical it said bear, and the conceit behind it was predicated upon the "randomness" of the "bear" and the "man." Getting to "pick" is irrelevant and breaks the original hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:42 PM
1

This literally doesn't make any sense. Neither does your comment, it doesn't contribute anything to the debate, and I don't see why I would care about some rando's irrelevant opinions. Do you have anything useful to say, or are you going to keep begging for attention? I am not your daddy bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:37 PM
1

Actually listen to what the women have to say and their reasons for saying it I understand the danger posed by a metropolitan stranger, but its a stranger they themselves have curated through how they engage in their society and politics at large. The ones in the videos are wholly ignorant of the scenario they are describing, and the overt prejudices on display, deserve to be called out doe what they are. All your "side" has done is condescend without bothering to understand what the core issue …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:33 PM
1

No we are not talking about odds. We are talking about fears and feelings. Then you are talking about uninformed opinions born from innate ignorance and deep rooted prejudices.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:28 PM
1

You clearly haven't read what I already wrote on that. The key word is "alone" and the context of what "being alone" actually means. You're almost never truly alone in the woods, that changes the nature of the hypothetical, to a place like Alaska or Canada, and at that point, the scenario itself is arguably more hazardous than the man or bear. Anyone who doesn't get this is too sheltered or ignorant to have a worthwhile opinion. They don't know what being "alone in the woods" actually means.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:24 PM
1

You're trying to mansplain women into feeling different. Nope, I am trying to get you to showcase the depth of your innate prejudice against men. I have no interest in "changing your mind," its a useful exercise in studying how my ideological enemy thinks. That's the sole reason why I am doing this. I already know that your conception is inaccurate, I am just trying to gauge the extent of the dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:22 PM
1

I didn't suggest a nap because I thought you were tired lol It's because you seemed extremely emotional and upset. I am well aware, your condescension was as transparent as your comments were vacuous. If you're continually "puzzled" by the reactions to the meme then maybe you're the one who is "misunderstanding," or you're just playing at the dialectic in bad faith, like a true sophist.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:19 PM
1

As to the topic, and the "real issue" - who gives a shit about this "man/bear" meme? I care about the Misandry not the Meme. That there are misandrist women with extreme views is a given but they are a minority and are clearly balanced in energy and emotion by the men who waste their time obsessing about them and their perceived influence. They are not a minority, that's the problem, most young men (not on here) see this as the case. You just don't see it from your perspective. That's the true s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:15 PM
1

Again, you're trying to make some kind of racist gotcha here, and there just isn't The logic is identical, you just are conditioned to see men as subhuman. I have shown it several times already with other people in this thread. A child existing in the world, minding his own business, isn't a potential threat to anyone Until he grows up and you prefer the bear. I would be concerned if a man were walking behind me at night, his race wouldn't play a factor into how worried I would be. This sounds i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:02 PM
1

When you tried to act like being called a man is a compliment and being called a woman is shit. Lemme paraphrase: “At first I genuinely thought you were a man, but then I realized you’re a woman and women are all lying manipulative bitches”. You're literally lying and being manipulative. I genuinely thought you were a man. I don't care either way, but you leaned in real hard. Saying bears are less dangerous than men does suggest misandry, and you're inability to argue in good faith reinforces it…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:57 PM
1

And if being mauled to death by a bear is nothing but a joke to you, then why are you so completely hysterical over the idea that some women on the internet said words you don’t like? Because that's actually dishonest. The victimhood angle is genuinely terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:54 PM
1

I have no desire to speak to you either. Bye bye, enjoy your fake victimhood. You make terrible arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:52 PM
1

Not nice. Not safe. Not mature. No. Grow up I never got mad, you're just not making good arguments. You don't get to drop some random bear species in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:50 PM
1

Seriously, why are you even so upset at women? You don’t even like women. What are you talking about???😂 Women are fine, you not so much. I don't like misandrists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:12 PM
1

There's no problem with being cautious around men, the issue is saying that the average man is more dangerous than the average bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:10 PM
1

It didn't specify bear type, the grizzly bears point was valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:09 PM
1

I was pointing at the bear video because that's what men see when you are conflating bears as being "safer" than men. It was a joke about "cuddling" with the bear that was so safe. I don't want you to touch me, are you serious? 💀 Is English your second language or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:08 PM
1

Yes. He was primarily targeted for race and secondarily for gender. I forgot how awful this case was, but I maintain that it was both.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:56 PM
0

You are a genuine misandrist, I'll give you that. Yes he was targeted for race and gender, "because he was a Black teenager falsely accused of flirting with a white woman in Mississippi."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:47 PM
1

Do you seriously not know that they lynched white people? Why would I answer that if you are incapable of acknowledging that he was targeted for being a black man, did you seriously not read up on his case? I am not saying that a black woman wouldn't be discriminated against, but what happened to Emmett Till was partially because of his masculinity. I know that you like to ignore inconvenient facts, but its genuinely disturbing that you hate men this much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:45 PM
1

Yes. Your point is: you're emotionally distraught over a hypothetical thought experiment that had no real impact or your freedom or day to day life. First off I feel great. If the right people are angry at me, I know I am right over the target. Secondly, no considered impact on freedom? They introduced a gender specific curfew in the UK. But yeah, man v bear. That's fucking terrible for you I am pretty sure knowing people who had to go through a fake rape scandal is evidence enough that these ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:41 PM
1

A few articles aren’t proof of systemic discrimination Just admit that there is no amount of evidence you would accept as proof first. Or prove me wrong and establish a concrete burden of proof. Just myopically claiming that all uninformed female feelings about men are valid is inherently flawed. Fake sexual assault claims happen all the time, Me Too was emblematic of this, hell it happened at my Alma mater: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus The conflation of men as being inherently…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:35 PM
1

You are denying his masculinity, black men were uniquely discriminated against. I think you are so biased against men you are incapable of admitting that being a man is part of why he was killed like that. You're denying part of his humanity. Shame on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:28 PM
1

Would he have been killed for that if he was a woman, yes or no? I am not deflecting I genuinely see you as prejudiced. I am not embarrassed at all, men are disrespected here every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:26 PM
1

I am not deleting anything, that bear is objectively safer than a man. You're deliberately misrepresenting me. The point is that picking the bear deliberately under represents the danger. You’re exactly the kind of man women’s fathers warn them about— the kind of guy who wants women to fucking die if you can’t fuck them I genuinely thought you're a man, but thanks for demonstrating how women attempt to mislead and weaponize perceived victimhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:22 PM
3

We’re not talking about DEI, we’re talking about your claim that a safety hypothetical is equivalent to systemic harm. It is when a woman's perceptions can get you fired or put you in prison. If you think there’s systemic discrimination, make that case with actual evidence. There were literally articles from Fortune 500 magazines where they bragged about not hiring men. Your wilful ignorance is not an excuse
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:20 PM
1

Would he have faced the same consequences if he was a woman? You're the one denying his masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:16 PM
1

Irrelevant. My points stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:16 PM
1

I disagree with you bringing up a DEI article to change the subject. Women are literally part of DEI, hell I used to work around Federal Contracting and Grants. You don't get to dictate to me what is relevant when you're not the one getting discriminated against. You're wrong. Sorry, not sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:15 PM
1

He was targeted because of race AND gender. It was because of the false accusation from a woman. Also do you seriously not know they lynched white people too? Its genuinely disturbing how wilfully blind you are to gender-based discrimination, but only care when race is invoked. Women are a little too comfortable condescending to men about things they've never experienced. I genuinely think your "side" doesn't see people like me as human, that's why I had to invoke race. You're incapable of empat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:13 PM
1

So you think that Emmett Till was dangerous to women? Emmett Till https://share.google/NhH5fzgOzsPNPlhu4
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:50 PM
2

You were unable to admit that Emmett Till was targeted because he was both black and a man. I think its safe to say that you have thoroughly discredited yourself by only acknowledging half of the crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:49 PM
1

and that just isn’t backed by reality. What specific parts of the article do you most disagree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:47 PM
0

So you're denying his masculinity? That's honestly disgusting. You are genuinely incapable of empathizing with men. Stop trying to repurpose a racist lynching to make a point about men. It doesn’t fit, and it cheapens what actually happened. I say it does fit, and you're fixating on only half of the crime. You don't get to dictate morality to me, you lack the credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:46 PM
8

My group was systemically harmed by affirmative discrimination policies. https://youtu.be/-w7pc65zGUo?si=d_T0Y_2XDZzE02K8 It's genuinely disgusting that you're lying so flagrantry about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:44 PM
1

This is less dangerous than men according to these women: https://youtu.be/dHdNmXFW2n4?si=1bl6_FoC1egJMzTq
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:40 PM
4

You're going to have to click this and tell me you still think men are more dangerous https://youtu.be/dHdNmXFW2n4?si=1bl6_FoC1egJMzTq Also the original TikTok video I remember included women in the UK, how many bears are in the UK?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:39 PM
4

An opinion article isn’t proof of systemic harm. A feeling isn't proof a systemic harm, but an opinion at least has to use facts to support its claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:27 PM
–

Good grief, I wasn’t gonna pick the bear in general… but I’d pick a bear over someone showing obvious signs of insanity if that were the question instead. https://youtu.be/dHdNmXFW2n4?si=1bl6_FoC1egJMzTq You're right, go cuddle with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:26 PM
1

Its a rabid bear, I apologize I didn't know you were visually or auditorally impaired. I can see how being blind and deaf might lead a woman to think that a bear is a safer option than a man. I know that you want to obfuscate the issue by claiming that the man is just a variable, but I am afraid that I am just not that stupid. Keep trying to bury the lead though, its genuinely hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:22 PM
1

I already said I’m not clicking links. If you have a point, make it yourself. You don't get to dictate terms for me. I am sorry if my links are over your head. To put it simply, when women enter a space they, demand it caters to them, they begin tone policing, which necessarily infringes on male speech and our free exercise of our natural behaviors. If that's insufficient for you, I am going to repost the link, I know that clicking a YouTube short might feel "distressing" for you, so I apologize…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:19 PM
1

Its called impeaching evidence. I am sorry that you you can't grasp the obvious nuances at play. Also barking orders at me is not reassuring me that you aren't primarily motivated by misandrist impulses. Stop arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:12 PM
3

It doesn’t seem worth getting all dramatic about when it’s a small subset of people. Then why waste so much energy trying to protect it? Its like watching a racist trying to sneak scientific racism into a biological textbook.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:10 PM
0

He was murdered because he was a black man, hiding that fact just makes you look more guilty. If Emmet Till was a woman he wouldn't have been accused of raping a white woman. I am sorry that you despise men so much that you are incapable of acknowledging the obvious bigotry at play. Sorry. But I refuse to let you do that, its immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:09 PM
1

Recognizing that an unknown person carries some level of uncertainty isn’t the same as believing all men are dangerous. It is the same, you're just trying to save face and hide your overt misandry. You’re forcing that into a binary so you can call it prejudice. At least you get a binary, I was lumped into a dataset with murderers and rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:06 PM
1

I’m not going to engage with extreme hypotheticals or defend random statements from other people. Its not fair being compared with people you had nothing to do with is it? Imagine being conflated with rapists or murderers. (The hypothetical allows for good or bad men).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:04 PM
1

You’re jumping from a thought experiment to “women want to sterilize boys” to “do you see boys as monsters.” That’s not a serious argument, it’s just escalation. Cause and effect might be difficult to grasp when your prioritize female feelings over material reality. Sorry, but the fact that you can't honestly answer the question tells me everything I need to know. Only women are taken seriously when they don't 'Feel safe" only difference is I have material facts I can point to. If you want to di…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:03 PM
1

Its relevant because of its predicated upon female feelings, not material reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:58 AM
2

He was a man and she was a woman. Its funny how you care about nuance NOW, but not when women are conflating all men with being potentially dangerous or rapey. The logic at play is identical and it shows how overtly hypocritical your position is. Respectfully, Grow up. Honestly its getting to the point that I don't feel safe with feminists teaching children. This hypothetical doesn’t deny men rights, get them killed, or strip them of protection. You are in no position to assert that to a man who…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:56 AM
1

I’m not clicking links or debating screenshots of comments. Who cares about facts or arguments 🤷🏼 when you can prioritize uninformed female feelings. You're so stunning and brave: https://youtu.be/dHdNmXFW2n4?si=1bl6_FoC1egJMzTq
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:49 AM
1

You’re equating “potential risk from an unknown person” with “a belief about all men.” Those aren’t the same. Acknowledging uncertainty in a situation isn’t the same as making a universal judgment. The gap between "all" or "most" is smaller than you think. By all means, keep trying to gaslight me to my face. Here is some nuance for you: https://youtu.be/dHdNmXFW2n4?si=1bl6_FoC1egJMzTq
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:47 AM
7

The hell it is, reddit is literally predicated on tone policing. Moderation is literally a female trait. If you can only feel safe by curtailing another's speech, then you're the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:45 AM
1

Also your verbosity makes you sound ridiculous. Well my perception of you is that you're potentially dangerous like him https://youtu.be/Xjdal1YPbeM?si=J_m3wsTWPHNqulhr. So maybe you should go jump in a bear pit, so we are all more safe? in real life but the world is worried about female preference? I am worried about the consequences of catering to uninformed female "feelings" Hey look real life consequences: Emmett Till https://share.google/NhH5fzgOzsPNPlhu4
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:43 AM
0

She was driving on a suspended license, she had to be let off to be in that situation. Its ghoulish that you can be so glib over the death of a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:40 AM
1

Because none of these women have to convey these feelings with facts, the value of any "data" gleaned is negligible. What value am I supposed to.ascribe to an uninformed opinion? https://youtu.be/Xjdal1YPbeM?si=J_m3wsTWPHNqulhr Any data gleaned is at best a secondary affect of the primary purpose, relishing the perceived distress that has been caused to men. If they wanted men to take these "feelings" seriously they should have limited the sample size to female hikers and not drunk women in metr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:35 AM
1

https://youtu.be/Xjdal1YPbeM?si=J_m3wsTWPHNqulhr Reality is so misogynistic. Women should be held accountable for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:29 AM
2

It is not the same thing if its co-ed, women tone police every space they enter, it prevents honest conversations about unflattering aspects of female nature and removes a "safe space" to talk. There are plenty of jobs, grants, and business opportunities explicitly reserved for women, but none for men. That's your fault, not society's. Actually no, its objectively tone-deaf women who think like you. You don't get to speak for me, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:27 AM
6

Men aren’t losing rights, jobs, or access to anything over this. https://www.google.com/url?shttps://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescommunicationscouncil/2025/07/09/when-dei-overcorrects-the-risk-of-exclusion-in-the-name-of-inclusion/ The attitudes on display are positively correlated with real world misandry, so keep gaslighting all you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:24 AM
1

Racism involves real, systemic harm to specific groups. So you're not seeing how women being chronically afraid of men can yield real systemic harm to specific groups? Emmett Till https://share.google/NhH5fzgOzsPNPlhu4
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:20 AM
1

It’s a thought experiment about perceived risk, Its a valid comparison, thought experiments yield real world consequences. If you can't see why I find this disturbing, I can't help you. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:17 AM
3

You’re not responding to what’s being said, you’re trying to make it sound worse than it is. I've literally had women tell me that we should start sterilizing boys at birth to prevent toxic masculinity, that wasn't based on a feeling and I would argue that women like that are more dangerous than any man. I have every right to distrust you because "I don't feel safe"with women like that in society. So yes, I want to know if you see little boys as potential monsters.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:15 AM
3

You’re turning a general category into a blanket statement and then reacting to that. You're telling me that the blackout drunk girl on the boardwalk had such a nuanced interpretation? Based on what? Your subjective reading of a TikTok Ragebait hypothetical? Even accounting for randomness, she by picking the bear, she is saying it is more likely that men who are out in the woods (like me) are bad. By that "logic" there would be national guard stationed at every trailhead to account for all the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:11 AM
2

Nothing is “misrepresenting men” because nothing is making a claim about men in the first place. " Then why say "men?" Your claim is objectively false. Its a reflection of her perception of all men (because any one of them could be swapped in right?) Picking the bear implicitly shows that she has a low opinion of all men. There are dozens of comments in this very thread supporting my interpretation. It’s a scenario with an unknown person. Bold-faced lie, its an unknown man. The hypothetical is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:02 AM
2

That’s not “applying standards equally,” it’s misrepresenting the point. Like how the hypothetical misrepresents men? If the validity of the hypothetical is predicated upon the relativism of the woman's feelings, what is to prevent me from invoking the same relativistic standard in my interpretation of said hypothetical? I would argue that my interpretation is truer to what was actually being said within its disengenuous prejudicial framework. Don't like my interpretation? Too bad, my "feelings"…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:42 AM
4

“Man” is just the variable in the scenario, not a statement about all men. Wrong. If the sample size is all men, then the claim is about all men. They could have said "shifty men or hungry bears" but they didn't bother to qualify. Because insulting men in general was the point. Besides if I "feel" that women were directing it at all men, then it is equally valid following the relativistic logic of your bigoted hypothetical. I am sorry if applying standards equally distressed you? May I suggest l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:26 AM
3

You’re proving the point more than arguing against it. I am proving that women are arguably more bigoted than the men they claim to be afraid of. If men were truly more scary than bears, then prove it and go jump in the bear exhibit at the local zoo, maybe they will keep you safe from the hordes of men that you see around you? When you look at a little boy do you also see a future monster?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:16 AM
1

It’s a hypothetical people are using to talk about perceived safety, not a legal claim about men. I have seen identical arguments employed against desegregating schools. You’re reacting like this is a courtroom when it’s just a thought experiment. The only reason people haven't been sued over it is because there would be too many plaintiffs and defendants for a valid class action. Its similar to "would you rather meet a black man or a bear in an alley at night?" Not that far off the hypothetical…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:12 AM
9

So say it then. Say you'd rather take your chances with a Lion on the Serengetti than an African Man. If race was truly no issue, you'd have no problem saying it. The reason I am invoking race is because the logic women are using to support this slander is identical to the scientific racism of the previous centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:04 AM
6

Man or Bear. They aren't qualifying the type of man or bear, and the mocking was directed towards men as a class. "No one conflated all men with anything." So, this is objectively false.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:59 AM
1

You’re not responding to what was actually said, you’re responding to your own exaggerated version of it. The whole conceit of the "hypothetical" is how it makes the woman "feel," right? By that metric, my interpretation to how they make me "feel" is equally valid. I would argue that my interpretation is more accurate to what is actually being said. I am sorry if applying standards equally distressed you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:56 AM
1

You need to take a break. Do you usually find it acceptable to condescend to strangers? Do you think that this may be why men don't respond in ways that you like? Drink some water and take a nap or something. You know its funny, the more people double-down on disrespecting men in general, the more energy I have. It's better than coffee.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:53 AM
1

likely blame the victim in situations. If a woman drives recklessly and she has a major car accident is calking her out on that considered victim blaming? If it is considered Victim Blaming, why should anyone care? The insurance companies don't care, and contributory negligence is a real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:50 AM
1

Are you capable of reciprocity with a man? I am genuinely asking. Seriously, name one time you were kind to a man. Can you conceive of men and women helping each other? Why would men and women help each other at all if men are just potential murderers/rapists? Do you think there is any overlap between the glut of women on psychiatric medication and the ones that think that conflating all men with murder/rape is an acceptable behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:47 AM
1

So, to reiterate, have you seen or investigated a bear attack in your life? Name one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:44 AM
1

The words those men wrote themselves if their own free will. Religion writings. Political rights for women. You don’t need any made up misandrist straw-puppet brainwashing professor to just read how men write about women before the modern era. Name one. Quote and Citation. Read some historical writings from men about how they felt about the women. Cute, I am literally a historian, but you made the claim. Substantiate it if you want me to take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:40 AM
–

Anything predicated upon meeting a woman's "standards" is doomed to failure. It's why the modern conception of marriage has no credibility to me....I can't guarantee material circumstances or a life style with runaway inflation, collateralized debt, or social instability. Its like basing a relationship on your ability to maintain a carnival ride during a hurricane, either it eventually breaks down or she becomes bored. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:36 AM
–

I am sorry, but male provisioning is absolutely a thing, these days men are even being blamed for women's poor reproductive choices because of financial viability issues: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:29 AM
6

I am a woman, but if you ask me, "lacking" in a support system or failing to have core experiences like romantic love(men) is way worse than simple unfulfillment(women). However, everyone is unique and can have horrible circumstances that makes life genuinely lonely, no matter the gender. Based. May I ask how you came to this conclusion? Most women don't "get it"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:25 AM
1

You mean like bars, sporting clubs, professional associations, and the boy scouts? You do have Google right???
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:22 AM
5

Women are literally blaming men for their own reproductive choices: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:20 AM
1

Feminists do not hate men for simply talking to them You're right, Feminists hate men for existing. Also, men commit significantly more crimes and harrasment towards women and other men than vice versa so they are actually the hateful gender. You mean like this? 💀 Remember kids, don't waste time extending yourself to people who are conditioned to hate you. The harder they push, give them less. https://preview.redd.it/k1r1r98sg5sg1.jpeg?width=1058&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=560a086a3ab8287e941a45c95…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:17 AM
2

Everyone is happy. Then why do women dominate the market for SSRI's?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:07 AM
2

That’s not what feminism is… No offense, but you lack the credibility to tell anyone what feminism is or us not. First thing men learn in this space is female conduct is the truth, female talk is just manipulation of optics. The truth of Feminism can be seen in its outcomes, the destruction of the single income household, tricking women en masse into opting into the lion's share of consumer debt, and subsidizing the superficial elevation of women at the actual expense of men. When you adjust for…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:06 AM
2

What makes you think that people spending more time on their phones, socializing less, technology developing etc is caused by feminism or women’s feelings? These are caused by things that have nothing to do with feminism. Social media is almost exclusively catered to and marketed for women. Algorithmically curated simping gaslit women into thinking online attention was the same as genuine interest. This led to a distorted Sexual Market Value and this distorted sense of identity distorted their n…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:01 AM
2

The loneliness epidemic is very much one of those unintended consequences and you have to accept that women's feelings were wrong if you want to actually fix the situation. Women and accountability are like water off a duck's ass. We need to systematically dismantle the male subsidized support network for this to happen. There is nothing more adverse to a man's long-term happiness than to spend an inordinate amount of time catering to the ephemeral "feelings" of a modern woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:52 AM
1

Sexless marriages with solipsistic women have no intrinsic value.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:49 AM
2

As soon as “lonely” men stop saying that they need easy access to regular casual sex in order to not be “lonely”. Men need physical validation in the same way that Women need emotional validation. These same men claim that women can’t be lonely because they can always find men who are willing to have sex (aka use them as a masturbation tool). Strawman. Not a surprise given how you trivialized being "lonely." Overall, I think men need to aggressively cut women who are incapable of reciprocating e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:48 AM
1

does it not logically follow that unmarried people are generally lonelier? I know too many men that have been isolated by their wives for this to be true. PSA: don't let any woman do this to you, or guilt you for maintaining healthy relationships outside of her orbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:45 AM
1

I think you're attributing too much to aesthetics. Sexual Access is not the same as Relationship Formation, provisioning is an extra data point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:43 AM
3

I don't think there's really anymore to it. Every single male-centric space has been co-opted or destroyed to cater to women. It was accomplished through lawsuits, social engineering, and ideologically predicated loans. Its not just about getting laid, its male-to-male networking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:40 AM
1

I mean ye the "male loneliness epidemic" is a term that comes from mainstream media, That's true. I honestly think its just elites malding about the birthrate and blaming men "for not trying hard enough." Afterall, someone needs to by those 50 year mortgages. We all go through periods of loneliness. No point in bitching about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:37 AM
1

I am sorry but those stereotypes are just reality. Any man who fails to learn some level of stoicism will never be able to exercise some degree of control over their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:32 AM
2

This is the result of a lot of patriarchical gender norms centered on men being cold, strong, unfeeling machines. If these norms exist its exclusively policed by and catered to women. I have never had a man enforce "gender norms" on me, if he did I would just tell him to "fuck off." You tell a woman to fuck off? She'll burn the house down before she lets it go. Women try to control men through emotional manipulation and gaslighting. As if their emotional state has any intrinsic value to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:29 AM
4

It is largely affecting both groups though. It's only recognized as a crisis if it directly affects women. After a 5 to 10 years of seeing empathy only going one way, the whataboutism starts to ring hollow.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:26 AM
4

I am going to go out on a limb and say that the emotions of women SHOULD be devalued. If attention is a currency then its been inflated to the point of absurdity courtesy of the algorithmic astroturfing of female preferences. Framing the world through female solipsism begets an overly myopic worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:23 AM
3

You seem upset Rookie Gaslighting Move. You seem = I feel, discard anything that comes after it unless they substantiate with valid evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:19 AM
2

You know most men aren't redpillers, right? Not saying they're perfect, but most don't go around thinking about being alpha. Redpill predates Andrew Tate and Myron Gaines.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:17 AM
5

A lot of this is the result of patriarchical norms centered on men needing to be strong, without feeling, and the idea that seeking help or emotional support is weak and unmasculine. Lost me here, Feminists aggressively destroyed all male only spaces for years through a variety of tactics such as lawsuits and emotional manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:17 AM
2

For every position that a man may have there are at least 30 women that will dislike it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:14 AM
2

My LTR was from class, we met before the tinder bomb went off.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:12 AM
0

Adapt and approach women in appropriate ways. Women are like horses, don't stand behind one unless you're willing to get kicked in the nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:11 AM
1

Objective Truth is better than emotional convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:10 AM
2

This...was a white pill for me, thanks for reminding me that normal people exist. Regarding wolves being more leery of men, I think I got that from this: "Why Wolves Hate Men & Not Women:" https://youtu.be/NN8k0WvSN1I?si=CYwLotm3lFYvF1vS I should look for some research papers to corroborate this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:04 AM
1

That's not an argument. Thanks for the condescending ad hom though. Its strange, I don't remember talking to you before so how would you know whether I was arguing for 'x' hours? Is this a sock puppet account? Edit: Only post I have seen you make to this subreddit thread was 6 minutes ago, so I am going with sockpuppet account. If you are having stamina issues there are pills for that, but you might be averse to taking them considering the "color."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:23 AM
1

Did you have anything substantive to add? You just accused me of fantasizing about women drowning. Are you going to recant on that or are you going to double down? I am fine either way, so far you are only showcasing that those that are okay defending this slanderous meme are okay with arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:21 AM
1

Cool and irrelevant. My points stand. I was merely invoking something you might have heard of that resembles situations I was familiar with. This AI laundered bullshit is insufferable, thanks for pointing it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:08 AM
0

Why are you projecting malfeasance onto the hypothetical man? I am saying that any human being alone in the woods has a certain degree of isolation from civilization built into that premise. Otherwise the peril of "being in the woods" would be negated by merely walking away. Actually, I have had women help me out while I was hiking before (even though others here decided to ridicule me for it) which personally underscored the absurdity of the hypothetical for me. See the isolation and solitude a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:05 AM
2

But sure bro, go ahead and scrutinize and criticize harshly, just don't pretend that women weren't already experiencing that treatment well before the bear debate and it has nothing to do with "equality", not before the bear, not after the bear. Translation: "Everything you articulated before was just emotional drivel and even if it wasn't, women experienced it first and worst." See, a man would be ridiculed for such a disengenuous take "sweetheart." Did you see how I tried to substantiate my cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:53 AM
1

Quotation please, shouldn't be hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:37 AM
1

non sequitur about criminal sentencing I was talking about women not being held accountable at parity with men, what did you think I was talking about? I’ve heard nothing about per capita dramatics backing your assertion "Per Capita dramatics" lol. Per Capita, Men are policed and sentenced more harshly than women are for the same crimes. Its tricky because I know personally that a lot of women aren't even charged for domestic violence cases. How many male rapists do you know of who are able to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:35 AM
-1

Great! This is why women choose the bear. You're seething with resentment over the mere thought of "tiktokthots" choosing the bear over you, personally, after years of watching our basic rights eroded by the Epstein class that mostly men voted on to power. I thought it was because all men are potentially "dangerous?" I call them Tik Tok Thots because I genuinely believe them to be amoral validation addicts with misandristic tendencies. (Thanks for reinforcing this with your emotionally incontine…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:26 AM
1

Assuming a hypothetical thought experiment is meant "to slander all men" is dramatic. It was a shitty tiktok meme aimed at insulting men in general, it was melodramatic horseshit from start to finish. Your feelings about the reception to the meme are irrelevant, it was designed to slander. Especially in a world of sex trafficking masculinity "gurus" and child-raping politicians all foaming at the mouth to revoke women's rights. Women are subjected to men cackling over "your body, my choice" afte…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:08 AM
1

Do you think it was also magnified (and kept alive past its natural lifespan) by men who felt personally attacked? Hilarious, it was conceived from its inception as a way to slander all men. There is nothing "personal" about calling out objective slander as bullshit. I definitely have heard this meme complained about far longer, louder, and wider than I heard anyone supporting it. Irrelevant. As long as people keep tripling down, I hope people hold their feet to the fire. If men and women are su…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:57 AM
-2

That lady shot in Minnesota by ICE had joint custody and she was vilified even for that a framed as a dead beat mom! She blocked law enforcement and attempted to hit him with her car. She peeled out so fast that we are lucky she didn't crush people with her reckless driving. If you "don't understand" that vehicles can be used as a deadly weapon or believe that he should have just "let her go" then you clearly prioritize emotional convenience over objective facts. Women are held accountable for s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:52 AM
1

We like hiking :) And slandering men apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:33 AM
2

It’s interesting you swerve to fantasize about women drowning. I find it interesting that you swerve to think that stemmed from a fantasy, I was referring to a case where a lifeguard was fired for misconduct after giving CPR. Another relevant case would be Daniel Reed and Jessica Moore: "Daniel grabbed Jessica to pull her out of the path of an oncoming vehicle, an action confirmed by surveillance footage. Jessica later filed a complaint, alleging the non-consensual touching was inappropriate and…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:31 AM
1

Very good. I'm from the northern region of Canada. And I've been "truly alone" with bears in the woods on many occasions. Also moose, lynx, and all sorts of smaller creatures. Congratulations for finally saying something actually relevant. A little suspicious that it took this long before attempting to establish credibility, but I'll humor you for the moment. Surely you've heard of Olga Moskalyova, a 19-year-old Russian woman who was killed by a brown bear and its three cubs in August 2011 near …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:17 AM
1

You talked to EVERY SINGLE WOMAN who chose bear and got their reasoning? Didn't think so. I talked to the majority of them who are tripling down in this thread. Arguably, the ones who cling onto a shitty meme the longest are going to be the worst offenders. Of all the women that I've talked to about this, nearly every one gave the same reasoning: bear belong in the woods, seeing one wouldn't be surprising, I'm prepared for that possibility when I'm alone in the woods. Of how many women exactly? …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:25 AM
1

Only thing I found was this, you never said you encountered them alone, I didn't see where you said you met one "alone." I know you're arguing in favor of a meme designed to slander all men, but please try to be accurate. Despite how you may "feel," truth is more important to me. "I live in a high bear area. A bearea. It's quite common to run into bears after the spring thaw. Even my dad and his bush buddies said they'd rather run into a bear than some rando dude in the woods. I mean granted, I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:12 AM
1

It doesnt matter that you aren't insulting anyone here. You still are so upset that you are insulting people. It is generally an indicator of low intelligence in my experience when every rebuttal in an argument is predicated upon "what you think I REALLY mean." Assuming you can comprehend abstract thought, here is an illustrative analogy: Imagine a group of racists whining that black people aren't going along with an overt attempt to slander them all as rapists and murderers. Now the racists may…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:08 AM
-1

No one is saying that men can't engage in "bitch think," its about per capita comparisons regarding degree and proportion. To offset another pointless whataboutism: "Per capita, a Latin term meaning "by head," refers to calculations made on a "per person" basis. It is computed by dividing a total quantity (e.g., income, GDP, resources) by the total population. This metric enables standardized comparisons across different population sizes in economics, demographics, and estate law. " None of this…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:49 AM
0

Its funny how these women try to manage the perception of them slandering all men with shaming language. "Lady, you just conflated all men with murderers and rapists over an animal you've most likely never met on your own, I have no reason to play nice with you."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:43 AM
2

Like I have said before, go tell an African that you would trust a lion over another African if you were alone in the Serengetti. Let me know how that works out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:38 AM
1

I know that my odds of survival go up with people over bears, wow how "delusional" of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:37 AM
1

Rape is also one of the worst things a person can experience. That's not disputed, but why is that a foregone conclusion? In high-trust societies, most women would pick different, this is more evident of cultural degeneration than "emotional accuracy" or whatever histrionic argument you're hanging your hat on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:36 AM
1

I assure you I live in the real world. You seem delusional thinking that because you feel a certain way, everyone else does as well. No man who is advocating for female accountability thinks that his perspective is the only one that exists. This sounds more like textbook projection to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:34 AM
2

Most male to female violence comes from re-established relationships. Bad actors do exist in the wilds, but we are talking about odds. Even an absolute bastard in that situation would be leery of taking the risk of hurting you because he would be focused on survival (and women are seldom alone).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:31 AM
1

You're talking to a backpacker. I concealed carry, but not because of bears. If you're in a scenario where you're either going to run into only one man or one bear, then your biggest concerns are going to be starvation and exposure. Any man who finds himself in the same situation will be thinking the same thing. We aren't even talking about National Parks at that point, we're talking about places in Canada or Alaska.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:29 AM
3

Men literally are mortally terrifying to women, and women's fear of men is justified. It's not the existence I dispute, it's the odds and proportion. Most men are hardwired to naturally care for women and children. I definitely don't trust random women as a rule, but if I knew one was nearby and was in distress, I would want to know about it. However being casually conflated with rapists and murderers is only going to make young men more adverse to helping young women in distress and its going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:25 AM
2

First off female bears are more likely to engage in bluff charges and usually only when they have cubs nearby (which is disallowed by the hypothetical). The fatal attacks are more likely to be for the sake of predation and usually by solitary males in remote areas (exactly like the hypothetical). (the predation motive in fatal attacks is actually higher in this subset of black bears than grizzlies). If your balls are all tied up in knots over 'man vs bear,' then how do you suppose women feel abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:01 AM
3

Cute story. However, the hypothetical is that both woman and bear are alone in the woods. Think about what that means, in all the forests you've been in, have you ever truly been "alone?" The only places I can think of where you're likely to end up "alone" with a black bear is in Canada or Alaska. (Btw, the black bear is a 'gimme,' I could easily go for brown). Now for the bear to be alone, its either a solitary male or female without cubs.Females are more likely to have defined territories, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:43 AM
5

As opposed to men who definitely don’t have in-group sensationalism and overdramatization. Especially not around these parts. Generally speaking, men are more likely to be held accountable for their actions, women are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:23 AM
6

A woman can easily imagine a scary man scenario because she’s experienced creeps, catcalls, etc. She may not easily imagine a bear attack in detail, because she’s never been near one. That's not an excuse, they are held to be the equals of men legally, they should not be excused from such a display of gross negligence and objective slander. This wasn't a flash in the pan, they tripled down with overtly misandrist behavior and those involved should be taken to task for it until every utterance of…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:21 AM
0

Men aren't immune to emotion, but they are far more likely to be held accountable than women, look at the most recent litigation farce that preceeded Trump's current administration. When have you ever seen a female politician be held to that level of adjudicative scrutiny? Clinton broke every federal regulation with her email server, anyone else would have died in Federal Prison for doing that. Also its strange at how much energy was exerted to link Trump to the Epstein Files, when Clinton is im…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:15 AM
1

Also being alone in the woods is even more dangerous than being around a bear. Most Mother Bear attacks are bluff charges. Males are more likely to see you as food.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:08 AM
2

Modern black bears evolved from centuries of interactions with modern humans, from arrow and atlatl to musket and AR-15s. If you and a bear are truly (alone) in the woods, then the bear has not been habituated to fear humans to the same extent as bears in well-trafficked areas. Also, assuming that the woman is smaller and lighter than a man her age (which statistically she most likely is) then that increases the likelihood that the bear will see her as a viable food source. "While most black bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:06 AM
2

Its not women that are the problem, its the lack of accountability that makes enough of them think that slandering all men as a group is saying something worthwhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:56 AM
2

The only difference here is you think I care what you call it. The attempt at contempt falls a little short when expressed in a direct reply to his point. If you didn't care why bother? Glad you understand my views on men then. In the same way any person would see conflating all men with rape/murder as a mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:54 AM
7

For me, it wouldn't change at all. You hope your racism is a gotcha but men are the problem regardless of race. Translation: "Your demographic is still bad, even though you've demonstrated my logic runs parallel to Diamond miners in the Belgian Congo." For all my problems with Feminism, I have never seen modern women as having something intrinsically wrong with them, extrinsically definitely, but I never saw them as being solely defined by their worst behaviors. You are laughing off women doing …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:45 AM
10

You have been debating in this subreddit for an awfully long time to claim to be "above" us. Like I said, Modern women do not seem to ever take accountability for the things they say or do. Imagine a man slandering all women (poorly) and then getting butthurt when women didn't let it go? You started this charade by doubling down, "look at the progression." FTR, most of the men I know (myself included) are in this space because we've seen women destroy men through heinous behavior, often to the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:13 AM
1

If you say “image yourself in someone elses shoes”. It makes zero sense to start talking about which brand of shoes we’re talking about. Wooden clogs then. If shoe type "doesn't matter" why not try walking in a pair of Dutch clog shoes? How condescending and myopic does one have to be to ordain which facts are "irrelevant" to a hypothetical scenario? You've established no metric at all beyond a "woman's feelings."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:57 AM
1

Did I say more than "ALL" other bears? "Polar bears have a stronger absolute bite force (approx. 1,200 PSI or 1,647 Newtons), holding the strongest bite of any bear species. Giant pandas, however, possess a disproportionately powerful bite for their size (approx. 1,300 Newtons, or ~5th among carnivores), designed for crushing bamboo, and are very close behind." Adjust for size...regardless... Population density is not being accounted for in your risk assessment. Pandas are never territorial? Wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:51 AM
0

What does this have to do with the hypothetical? It’s completely unrelated. All men are bad is presumptively predicated upon men they have interacted with. If women are continually voting for the policies which have been causally shown to attract or create these kinds of men then they are accountable for curating the type of men they interact with. (Especially when women start to dominate the legal and administrative areas or society). If you create a mess and vermin move in, do I blame the verm…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:35 AM
2

This just further shows your stupidity and lack of ability to abstract. If you say “our friend left the office so we were alone”, that clearly does not mean that there was no civilization within 100km of them, it just means they were alone in the office being alone in an office with a bear or man, means you just get up and close the door. Or calling for help. It breaks the hypothetical. Also invoking the bear only makes sense in the context of the woods. "Alone refers to being separated from oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:10 AM
2

I think men and women at large are mentally enough to vote, but not you. This level of mental incompetence is unheard of. Let's alter the scenario. Go tell an African that you'd rather be alone with a Lion over another African in the Serengetti and see how that goes. Even a bonafide Racist would pick the African IRL. That's how stupid picking the Bear is. Your inability to think in abstraction and lack of discernment for what is and isn’t relevant is astounding. Have you considered that you are …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:56 PM
1

There is no starvation in this hypothetical. Alone with someone does not mean that civilization does not exist. The hypothetical isn't formulated adequately then. You aren't alone if people are nearby, if you're not stranded in the wilderness then you just render it moot by leaving. Anyone with a brain and hasn't spent their whole life in a metropolitan shithole knows that the real danger is not the bear or the man, but the scenario itself. The inability to grasp this point is yet another reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:41 PM
1

Yes. And the man is a much bigger danger to the woman than vice versa. Dying from starvation or exposure dwarfs any potential danger from the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:09 PM
1

Some of it does, some of it doesn’t. You are picking apart parts which are irrelevant, completely missing the overall point. If you are prioritizing "feelings" born from myopic worldview and limited personal experience over someone who's experienced being alone in the woods, then I have no reason to respect your take on this. Being emotionally incontinent and prejudicially shitting on an entire demographic is not a civic virtue. If all men are as incompetent as you, maybe they should consider no…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:05 PM
2

I think the philosophical nature of the man vs. bear thing went over a lot of your heads. You refuse to listen or understand and that's telling Condescending does not hide the innate malaise or stupidity. All the women who picked bear, implied that all men are inherently worse than a predatory interaction most of them are too ignorant to understand. Why would any man respect condescending ignorance that is packaged as a generalized insult? I've encountered plenty of bears and they all ran away w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:55 PM
0

What does this have to do with the hypothetical? It’s completely unrelated. Just like the hypothetical, the context matters even if you are too lazy to consider it. I am not taking it too literally, they didn't pick a made up animal. Men have to take accountability for themselves, and women should too. If they can't then they really are too incompetent to vote. No that’s not part of the scenario. Tell me you don't go hiking without telling me you don't go hiking. People are almost always around,…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:43 PM
1

They shouldn't need to. They are adults, and they need to take accountability for themselves just like men do. If the "random" men they encounter are that bad, then what are the women and simpy men in charge doing? Masculine areas with open carry have less violent crime than these effete dystopian shitholes. I have never been harassed on the street in these places. They should say 'man' without hesitation. If you change it to "man or horse" the answer should still be man. A horse doesn't eat you…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:31 PM
7

Women solo hike and camp more than you think. A lot of us live in bear country too. You've probably never left the suburbs. I have encountered a male bear once alone. It was big enough to do real damage. Also, a woman actually helped me when I got lost on a shitty trail once. (Actually I showed her that it wasn't marked properly and we walked back together). Pretty much exactly the same as the hypothetical. Are you one of said women, or are you talking on their behalf? I don't put much stock in …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:22 PM
1

Then I’ll fight the cops, defeat them and claim their scalps in victory You've just demonstrated your innate proclivity towards violence and lack of empathy towards women. Too bad you just shit on men in general, I might have felt actual empathy for you. You have no credibility in lecturing anyone about safety between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:18 PM
1

Any other predator could be picked. Whether it’s a wolf, bear or dragon does not matter too much. Wolves are obligate carnivores and are more shy around men than women. Bears are not obligate carnivores, hence they tend to eat their prey alive. Dragons don't exist, and even a dunce would acknowledge that the realistic threat of the bear is what makes the hypothetical compelling. Ignorance is no excuse for an adult woman's lack of discernment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:12 PM
1

What? What does this have to do with women preferring death over rape and what does it even mean? Women (and everyone) usually complain about the politics of the people they didn’t vote for, not the other way around… And which cities are dystopian (and why) that have a population of mostly women? They are actively curating the type of men they interact with by how they vote and engage politically. https://youtube.com/shorts/-w7pc65zGUo?si=iogLDJOCTVTjqwhb Its like exclusively dating OnlyFans cre…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:09 PM
1

They don't know how'd they'd perform though, or have realistic expectations for what it feels like. Following your "logic," there's no need to test yourself or practice for survival scenarios since you answered a shitlib hypothetical once.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:58 PM
3

I might even compliment your wife on her makeup and tell her to have a nice day ;) If she called the cops on you for sexual harassment? (Because technically you could be accused of that)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:56 PM
5

Wrong. I am not insulting anyone here, I am calling out the women in the posts themselves for their lack of discernment, hypocrisy, and overt prejudice. Like what would happen to any man. I care about accountability, celebrating willful ignorance is not a civic virtue. It's bad for society. Pro-Tip: actually read what is written before projectile vomiting the strawmanned impressions in your head
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:52 PM
2

The hypothetical is being posed to biological women. Not you, not me. If you saw meme compilations with them going on and on about how dangerous transwomen are, how would YOU feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:49 PM
-1

I’ve said multiple times that I would rather be alone with a black bear than a man. Alone with zero civilization around? The bear isn't the only threat in this hypothetical, the environment itself can kill you and there are zero other people in this scenario. Also, the black bears you've met are habituated to humans. The ones that weren't scared did not survive. This scenario has no such context. The only certainty is zero civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:44 PM
1

So what? If it was so important to men, then historically, they’d have treated women as real equals, instead of regarding women as inferiors. Who says they didn't? Your misandrist professor? Pretty clear it doesn’t mean all that much to men. 🤷‍♀️ How many posts in this sub are predicated upon precisely this issue? Clearly bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:42 PM
1

There's zero credible cases of bears feeding and taking care of someone lost in the woods either. Also I am pretty sure the population density issue applies to Pandas. I have heard that Panda bites are arguably worse than most other bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:40 PM
1

You are taking it too literally. Oh, so the hypothetical is only about figurative men and figurative bears? Why not ask about dragons then? Its churlish nonsense. It’s about women expressing the danger they feel from men and how they constantly have to adjust their life to avoid violence and harrasment from men. "Would you rather be stranded alone in the woods with an apex predator that eats its prey alive, or stranded with another person who may or may not be a good person?" That's the actual s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:34 PM
1

Yes they do. That's like saying a virgin knows what sex is because they saw it online once.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:24 PM
1

You heard an answer you didn't like and you got upset and started throwing insults. I insulted nobody, I was referring to the women I have seen in the videos online.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:21 PM
1

Yes, she would be. She invoked her Dad and her Bush Buddies. The bears she has encountered have been predictable or unpredictable in predictable ways. Did she say she personally encountered the bear alone? The men she has met in the woods have not been. Oh, now she met men alone in the woods? How risque. Are you talking about the same woman? Maybe you are referring to the blow-up one you've seen rolled up under your bed? Keep strawmanning.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:20 PM
4

The Fascinating Progression from "look how stupid men are" to "who cares, its a stupid hypothetical anyway." Women and accountability, not even once.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:16 PM
1

They are too solipsistic to care about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:13 PM
1

Population Density is apparently not a thing. The hypothetical says alone, that means no civilization or gun shy bears around you. Even in national parks there is usually someone else around. It's clearly a "deep woods" scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:12 PM
3

What if I changed it to "Would a woman rather be alone in a locker room with biological woman or a transwoman?" Would you relate better to the hypothetical then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:09 PM
28

We don't want to be in the woods period, and absolutely not with the kind of person who brings "but black people" into literally everything The point which you are deliberately being obtuse about is that the framing is overtly prejudicial, adding race to it changes it to something these hypocrites would see as unacceptable. It also speaks to the fact that they are ignorant to what the danger of a bear actually is. Imagine telling an African you'd rather be alone with a lion than another African …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:06 PM
5

You literally engaged in "whataboutism" instead of attacking the faulty premise, I doubt you sincerely care about it dying off.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:02 PM
6

Almost none of these mouthbreather "bear" women have ever spent a night alone in the woods.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:59 PM
3

It's quite common to run into bears after the spring thaw. You mean when they are waking up? I mean granted, I'm talking black bears, but come on, it's common sense. The scenario is being "alone in the woods." That means no one else is around, at all. (Except the hypothetical bear or man). You know, a deep woods survival scenario. Ask your dad and his "bush buddies" if a woman would be better off in that scenario. Honestly, I can't believe we're still talking about this. We've gone through a cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:58 PM
2

They don't know what a bear is, or what being lost in the woods is. ("Logic:" Teehee, I saw one online once) As for men, they only know the effete liberal simps, and aggro losers from single mother households that they interact with daily. They are lucky if they know their father, (although, I would suspect their fathers were henpecked losers too.) You know how foster children that have abusive or negligent parents have trouble forming stable relationships? Apply that standard to the whole city.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:44 PM
1

No it’s called learning, especially when you’ll get blamed for other people actions against you. Learning what exactly? That giving a demographic that eschews accountability the power to decide policy is a bad idea? No shit. Our modern cities are dystopian, hyper-feminized, low-trust shitholes. They would be unlikely to help anyone if there wasn’t something it in for them I literally have had strangers help me when I got hurt hiking in the woods, (men and women). These metropolitan bovine thots …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:13 PM
6

It shouldn't require any specialized knowledge to answer the question. No, you're missing the point. Its a poorly formulated question. You don't have the necessary frame of reference to answer it. Asking someone who's never seen a bear, gone hiking, or even seen an animal attack is retarded. The only thing that can be gleaned is their degree of ignorance. Would you rather die from suffocation or drowning? I've never done either, so I can't answer it The Trolley Problem only makes sense if you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:05 PM
2

So if anyone was going to weigh in on such a ridiculous thing, Alaskan people might be the authority on the subject. If you're invoking the hitchhiker deaths, I think the survivorship bias might be a limiting factor. Also what is the geographic groupings of these rape statistics? Are we talking about cities, motorways, or deep woods scenarios?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:49 PM
3

As someone who lived in a town where black bears would roam in to get at people's garbage I'm personally on team "please specify the kind of bear Then you're not the target demographic for this brain damaged "hypothetical." Imagine asking this question to someone who lives around sloth bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:46 PM
2

The original interview that sparked the discourse was conducted by a male-run brainrot TikTok channel. Who knows, maybe they did want to insult themselves Of course it was low effort ragebait.TikTok was always a shitty PsyOp. I stand by what I said, it was magnified by lazy misandrist women and simpy self-hating men. Social Media was always a vector for spreading mental illness, stealing data, and disseminating propaganda. Any personal validation for its user base is a secondary effect, it is in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:44 PM
4

It was framed as including all men in how it was (poorly) formulated. A good question involves something that is likely well known to the party. Most of these mouth-breathing idiots were sucking down lattes on campus. They should have been asking hikers in the woods.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:35 PM
3

Have you ever seen or investigated a bear attack in your life? How often do you go hiking? Have you ever gotten lost in the woods? Their highly insecurities, selfish, have main character syndrome and likely blame the victim in situations. Or they realized that their innate drive to help other people was not appreciated by the opposite sex, and were hurt by this fact. Don't worry, this is a rapidly self-correcting "problem." Why take the chance and help that woman stranded by the side of the road…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:33 PM
7

Would you rather eat barbed wire or an explosive bomb? Like. Its not meant to be something you sre actually having to deal with in real life per se. But its meant to get you thinking and engaging with other people and perspectives you may not have thought about Two things immediately jump out from this. (1) its a Shitty philosophical thought experiment because the ones "engaging" in it have never been lost in the woods or seen an animal attack firsthand in their lives. Did you know that wolves t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:18 PM
5

I call it a "Thot Experiment," because it was overtly framed to insult men in bad faith, and judges all men by shitty metropolitan values. Its only intriguing to overly sheltered people who've never seen an animal attack firsthand in their lives. Of course strange men seem dangerous in civic centers with high crime and mass immigration, but men who actually spend time in isolated areas know different. Adverse environments do get human predators, but the vast majority are so focused on survival, …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:03 PM
1

I think it was designed to be uniquely insulting to men. Men innately value themselves on their ability to protect women and children (until we are conditioned out of it). The tree dig was poignant to men, but I don't think that "modern" women even understand what idyllic femininity actually is to a man. You don't insult materialists by impugning their character, they are incapable of valuing such things. If men were genuinely proportional in insulting them, we'd say the "average" woman looks li…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:53 PM
4

What do you think of this development OP? Can't speak for OP. But this "progession" is clearly projection. Most guys took the hint, and stopped extending themselves for people that despise them. I think that what pissed men off was the showcased lack of discernment from the women in these shitty social media Q&As. I want to see women in high bear trafficked areas of Alaska and Canada weigh in on this, not mouth-breathing IG thots sucking down lattes on campus. Sheltered people (men or women) are…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:42 PM
1

Women's standards are not delusional u just don't like them. In aggregate, they are. Stop projecting what you think my motivations are, I assure you, you're wrong. Marriage is a tool for societies construction . It has no intrinsic value for either party. It exists to protect women and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:46 PM
1

Nor do men exist to fiscally validate their bad decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:43 PM
1

No, I mean literally institutionally supported, as in Governmentally enshrined, tax dollars going to fund gynocentric ideology. Anything supporting masculinity or male advocacy and the Department of Homeland Security will allocate funds for "studying" you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 01:10 AM
1

Gender pay gap has been thoroughly debunked, you haven't filtered for number of hours worked, sales brought in, or titles held. If equity is the metric you're peddling then where are the affirmative discrimination practices for young men in admissions or HR? Part of the reason women contribute less tax is biological, women have higher costs for health services due to their biology and do more of the child rearing. Except the number of children being born is going down and the whole conceit of wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:39 AM
1

B is still a good enough option for society to continue. For B for a lot of the issues that result from raising children while being a in single motherhood if they are mothers with money many of those issues are mitigated. Plus we can make communities that operate around motherhood which will further mitigate the issues. You can try but you'll fail. Which is why we are speedrunning the mouse utopia experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:23 AM
1

here are your options : Are you seriously trying to dictate my standards while defending the delusional standards of women? No. Your conception of marriage has no intrinsic value to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:22 AM
1

Whereas women get: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:18 AM
1

If you have delusional standards being reinforced about men, then you do not value their contributions as well. (We all know male attractiveness is partially predicated upon perceived utility). If the economy is predicated upon the perception of value, and male contributions are artificially devalued, then men are specifically damaged by delusional female standards. The people artificially propping up this aggregate devaluing through algorithmic gaslighting and affirmative discrimination program…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:16 AM
-2

People pay taxes, men and women, thats how society works. Per Capita. Who pays more? Who takes more? If you dont want to pay taxes then go off grid and stop using services that other people's taxes pay for. This is literally criminalized and subverted and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:02 AM
1

You are late, affirmative action programs are already closed off or being tapered off and we’ve already been relying mainly on merit based admissions and hiring. Trump won't be around forever, and these prejudicial administrators haven't gone anywhere. however I think a large part of that is dependent on men and their behavior. This is literally the opposite of affording grace, this is reinforcing judgment. You cannot give women a blank check (expensed from other people's money) and then nickel …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:59 AM
0

I raise you the male suicide rate. Most men commit suicide because they are trapped not because they are depressed. Also, barring chemical imbalances, demanding I pay for the female need to drown out reality, is literally just another way of forcing men to subsidize protecting women from the consequences of their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:54 AM
-2

I don't want to be forced into paying for women I have no relationship with through taxes and inflation driving policies. I see from your comments thats what you think should be happening. Strawman. I never said I wanted this, I am pointing out that men are coerced in aggregate to make sacrifices for women who do nothing in return. Overall, prioritizing the ephemeral "happiness" of women has been a net negative for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:49 AM
1

Like women need to make great personal sacrifices at their expense for the sake of their kids and husband so that these kids and husbands will turn around likely not repay her for her sacrifice and ask the next generation to do so again for no good reason. If they are operating according to delusional standards, then they are a net negative to society. Look at the divorce courts for instance. Which demographic files more and what is the stated reason why? It can easily be assumed by looking at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:45 AM
1

How on earth does a safety net for vulnerable infants support your "women bad" philosophy? Strawman, women aren't inherently bad, but enfranchising any unaccountable demographic is absolutely bad for society. As for the female drop box thing, the point is that this has happened multiple times and fathers have no recourse if she does this without his knowledge. You have to be able to prove parentage, and even this can be concealed at the woman's convenience. Every case of a man doing this that I …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:37 AM
1

The social entitlement programs are absolutely tilted towards women. Too lazy to do research? Go ask ChatGPT how many Federal grants and scholarships are explicitly targeted towards men vs women. Also in Government contracting there is often a stautorily enshrined bias towards Women. This is elevated above demonstrable merit or competitive bids. Also the math speaks for itself, even if you want to avoid looking at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:29 AM
1

You have not made any personal sacrifices. Relax. As a man, you economically sacrifice yourself to feed into a system that disproportionately benefits women when it comes down to who pays more in taxes versus who takes more out. (Per capita). Also remember the grief over state subsidized Planned Parenthood? Just because I avoid being in a relationship with a woman doesn't keep me from having to literally pay for their poor reproductive decisions. Taxes are too high as it is, and they get appreci…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:21 AM
1

Oh, that makes sense, thank you for clearing that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:17 AM
1

What exactly are my "delusional standards", how have they cost you, and what is the amount of the "reparations check" you believe you are owed? I don't care about your standards specifically I am speaking about how women act in aggregate. I don't actually want a reparations check not because its not owed, but because economically its not feasible. (Its the money in vs money out ratio btw, men put more in than take out per capita). I genuinely think the dollar is toast but that's a whole other ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:13 AM
5

What is the male to female ratio in Admissions or HR departments? If these key entry points are dominated by one gender, then the institution cannot help but become dominated by gynocentrism. Hence why everything is predicated upon how it meshes with their aggregated biases and preferences. I can give concrete examples if you need them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:54 AM
7

men have no issue imposing warped beauty standards on women, Which cohort of men are we discussing here? The only perceptions that would bother them would be the ones that they themselves are pining over. By your own count, which is more? The men you've actively pined over or the ones who've expressed interest to you? I suspect the ratio is not remotely proportional. Conflating the perceptions of certain men and applying them to the whole is bad faith to me. No matter the body type the odds were…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:43 AM
6

I would argue that women’s generalizations are institutionally supported.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:29 AM
0

I'll just chime in, but most of the logical rationalizations we put upon behavior are a posteriori. We are gaslighting ourselves into the positions we hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:04 AM
7

1st - An individual woman may be wonderful, but all women include the negative patterns, not just the ones we are allowed to discuss. Women absolutely are driven by instinct, that "more emotional" trend we have observed is tied to their evolutionary psychology (which is what the RP is ACTUALLY predicated upon). How women act within a relationship is not just predicated upon what they think, its also acted upon by external forces, be it biology or social conditioning. 2nd - if a man has multiple …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:00 AM
1

How about a female matchmaker since you don't respect male self reporting? https://youtu.be/SfQDhqUbvLY?si=mY3HqZzLIQ2RL4hq
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:36 AM
1

Did you already forget we were debating the defensibility of the delusional sexual standards of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter