Home

kim-possible Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by kim-possible on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This person was wrong. They clearly didn't read the article or look at time stamps for comments. What I said to them: Actually, he made that comment before the Forbes article was posted. If you read the article, you will see that's not an accurate assessment of what they did. They compared like positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 06:31 AM
1

Actually, he made that comment before the Forbes article was posted. If you read the article, you will see that's not an accurate assessment of what they did. They compared like positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 06:29 AM
2

Sure. Look, as it is pretty obvious at this point that you either think women have less value than men, hate all people and want to live on an island by yourself but lack the skills, or understand nothing about economic systems -- and quite possibly all three -- there is no purpose in me continuing any sort of attempt at good faith discussion with you. So I'm just going to say you can call it the sexual harassment tax and be done with you. Later tater.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:58 PM
2

used for public works Right. So things you agree with and that benefit you. We didn't have an income tax in this country until the early 1900s, soo that's incorrect. The federal income tax isn't the only type of taxation. The government wasn't doing shit without tax dollars until 1913. There were taxes on products, poll taxes, local taxes, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 06:08 PM
1

So you think taxes should only be used on things you agree with and that benefit you personally. Cool. That's just not how societies work, dude. They literally could not function that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:35 PM
1

I'm sorry. I can't anymore. Your comment literally made me laugh out loud it is so ridiculous. I just can't handle unpacking each of your delusions just to have you circle back to them again a comment or two later anymore. Take care of yourself, man. I hope one day you grow out of this and become a happier and healthier person and have lots of positive and joyful relationships with women. Have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 09:04 AM
4

If that was true then rates would've went down after Obamacare mandated routine tests instead of going up. I think you're missing the part where a) Obamacare is a conservative and patchwork approach to healthcare, b) rates are not the measure of cost, c) you've only had most of the program for four years, d) rates are partly going up in response to uncertainty about ACA continuing due to Trump and Republican efforts to repeal and d) the US is not the only place where healthcare exists for compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:59 AM
1

Women aren't magically going to be attracted by you because you're so thrilled about your computer science project or your video games. Not all women obviously, but I never said they would. There will be people who are interested in those things. If you find interesting things about your hobbies and communicate passionately about why you like those things, and you go out and meet people, you will be able to find people who are attracted to that. Passion is charismatic. they're never going to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:51 AM
1

But if a large amount of guys say they experienced the same thing. Obviously its more common than people think. If you make a statement about how women are/what they think and a woman tells you it is inaccurate and points out there isn't research to support that belief and you defend it because you know lots of men who think the same then you are still privileging your own voice over other peoples and over facts. Literally no one is saying this. On average? Yes. But no one believes all people of…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:23 AM
2

the whole point of insurance is for emergencies Umm. No. Preventative care is important and in many areas saves money in the long run. STD screenings, cancer screenings, reporting of communicable diseases. There are tons of ways in which 'regular' use of health services is important and saves money. Not to mention pregnancy which doesn't even apply to me. You came from a uterus. Pregnancy applies to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:59 AM
1

You started out saying "nobody ever cares about my computer science hobbies". You have now amended that to clarify that you simply don't have enough updates/action to entertain people regularly. Those are not the same issue. Talk about your hobby when you have something to share. That's true of literally all hobbies. Talk about other hobbies, current events, things that happened during your day or spend more time listening to the other person when you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:50 AM
2

Agreed. How is that not textbook gender discrimination? Auto insurance already increases costs when you get in an accident. Why is that not sufficient? I am from British Columbia where we have government-run insurance and they do not do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:39 AM
2

I should've have to pay more just to cover others That is literally the point of insurance though. You all pay together and it covers the people who wind up needing the service. You might end up being a super expensive client. You don't know. Assuming you personally should pay less because you might cost less based on your gender defeats the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:34 AM
1

There may be a trend wherein some men (possibly even many, I don't have the research on this) tend to ignore women who they don't find attractive but I would avoid making the categorical statement that men as a whole don't do so simply because you have not seen it. I certainly have -- especially in academic circles where men might compliment a woman researcher that they've never met (or even seen) for doing important work in the field.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 04:40 AM
1

Alright, haha. You got me! There is one AWALT I will 100% agree to and it is this: all women are in some way distinct/different from a monolithic conceptualization of 'all women'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 04:32 AM
4

Forbes disagrees. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tanyatarr/2018/04/04/by-the-numbers-what-pay-inequality-looks-like-for-women-in-tech/#afcf1260b113
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 11:20 PM
5

According to Forbes (totally left wing biased rag dontchaknow) they aren't. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tanyatarr/2018/04/04/by-the-numbers-what-pay-inequality-looks-like-for-women-in-tech/#afcf1260b113 This person is, unsurprisingly, basing his information on nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 11:17 PM
3

Right. You clearly did not intend to lump me in with that at all by saying "typical response from..." in relation to my response. You used the word innate incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 11:01 PM
2

Are you talking about me or just generally guys in the manosphere? I'm going to address this first because I frequently use a general and abstract 'you' and will continue to do so here. It is rhetorically simpler but I am not necessarily targeting you as an individual and will specify if I am speaking specifically about you, but as I do not know you I will probably not be doing so. How am I suppose to believe it when I've experienced the opposite? Your experiences do not supercede either researc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 10:12 PM
1

I mean, look, if you're literally just not going to believe the majority of what I say then I'm not sure why you think this is a genuine discussion. I will simply point to this central problem: You have a bunch of men in these communities saying "all women are like x" and "only men have to deal with y". You have women saying "I know tons of women who aren't like x" and "I totally identify with what you're talking about in regards to y. I also deal with that." If you're going to plug your ears an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 09:12 PM
3

Except I didn't say "all men are like that". You have created a straw man to be angry at. But you go ahead and shake your fist at the argument you built all by yourself and see if it gets you anywhere. And I love how you assume that I am fat. Good work dude. You ferreted me out. All size 2, 120lbs of me has been wounded horribly. Look at me beach myself on the shores of depression and celebrate your victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 05:23 PM
2

Lots of people like computer science! Maybe you aren't great at communicating them in a way that people can connect to? Like, I can't follow code conversations but I like seeing the end result of things people have created and descriptions of how they make it work as long as they don't use too much jargon that causes me to lose the plot! Just a thought. Maybe you also aren't hanging out with other people who nerd out over computer science too? They're definitely out there!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 05:19 PM
1

Every woman online that says this ends up being super attractive. Look, when I say that I'm not conventionally attractive, I don't mean I'm a brunette with a few extra curves. What I mean is I spent a significant portion of my childhood and adolescence being bullied for my appearance and it took a long time for me to be comfortable being who I am and understanding that I'm not everyone's cup of tea and that's okay. Don't dismiss my perspective because you assume as a woman that I must be 'super …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 05:15 PM
2

I wish it was that easy. If it was, there would be no incels, mgtow, or trp. I don't think it's necessarily always easy, but this is the simplest approach. And, yes I am a woman, but (as I already mentioned) I have social anxiety and I don't necessarily find it easy myself. I'm not what you would call conventionally attractive to most men. Men don't generally tend to approach me, it goes the other way when I'm feeling brave. The mindset that all women have it easy is pretty toxic, imo. I will gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 06:25 AM
3

Step 1: State that "women" have a fundamental and specific nature that you, enlightened man that you are, declare not hard to see. Step 2: Get on high horse when woman doesn't respond particularly positively to aforementioned comment. Step 3: Avoid having to explain yourself. Step 4: Declare win. Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 05:04 AM
2

but there are plenty of guys with hobbies that are single. Absolutely, but you'll notice I paired having hobbies and finding yourself interesting with also flirting and asking people out. A lot of those men are missing the second part (and likewise the women). YMMV but overall those two things will lead to at least some dating. if it'll get you laid faster, why not? The question referenced dating. If you just want to get laid then you hardly need to go through the above steps. Just be clean, dre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 05:01 AM
1

it's not up to you to determine if you are interesting. It is not up to you to determine if you are interesting to an individual person but if you are interesting to yourself then you will attract someone with similar interests. Why bother pretending to be something you aren't to appeal to some idea of what a girl might like? Ain't nobody got time for that shit. Do you do this currently? Sure. The grand secret is that I would mostly do things the same. Focus on being a person I like and then fli…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 04:17 AM
1

I didn't say anything about you. I said your response wasn't coherent. You both told me to go digging through your past posts and told me I won't want to do so. It was patently unhelpful and, I imagine, was not intended to be. If you wanted me to learn your opinion, you would have shared it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:42 AM
2

Can you point me towards some public discourse that sends men this message? Either articles in media or some genre of films or something? Because women grow up learning the message that we are supposed to compete and all other women are catty bitches who will steal your man - and this is supported in a lot of public discourse and media - and we have to unlearn this in order to value female relationships as adults so I'm just having a hard time putting myself outside that paradigm to see when/whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:30 AM
2

But we aren't just talking about pick-up artistry here? We're talking about other things that are attributed to "female nature" like women will cheat on you, you can't know what women are thinking, women want Chads, women like to be subservient... there's a whole bunch of crap tied up in AWALT other than simply "here's how to flirt in a way that's attractive to women".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:13 AM
1

Ah. A totally coherent response, that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:10 AM
2

Please. Enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 02:47 AM
2

Why bother arguing in favor of a maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 02:45 AM
2

But what is your evidence that it works? Where is the research showing that Red Pill approaches make for happier individuals and/or more successful relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 01:54 AM
4

Be the most interesting and successful version of myself that I can be. Be socially active in communities I like. Cultivate meaningful friendships so that a partner isn't the most important thing. Flirt with women I find attractive (when in an appropriate social situation) and ask them out if they flirt back.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 01:14 AM
9

Of course it won't, because there is no singular female nature. Get to know the specific woman you want to know. Stop thinking there is a magic answer that will help you because no matter what the advice or assumptions or even research that shows a plurality of success... it won't work for all women. Because... Not all women are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 01:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter