Christian men desperately want to make this distinction, but is there any?

Readership: All; Men;
Theme: Problems with The Red Pill / Misunderstood Models
Author’s Note: This post contains some input from Lexet.
Length: 1,200 words
Reading Time: 6 minutes

I posit that the last place on earth you will find ‘Biblical Femininity’ being practiced is in an American church.  I would even troll Churchians a bit by saying they produce more tr@ns wimmin than the secular world.  Why?  Their women aren’t being raised to be homemakers and mothers.  They aren’t being raised to be quiet, submissive, and respectful.  They are loud, proud, obnoxious, and immodest.  They dress like men, act like men, want to work like men, and want to compete with men.

img-1783678106-6a50c49a422078.27226609.jpg

At the opposite end of the inverted r@!nb0w spectrum, whenever there is talk about ‘Biblical Masculinity’, what this often refers to is the Chivalrous, emasculated, Purity Culture / virgin-in-waiting, stultified Beta male (which is a misnomer in itself).  After all, Churchianity is a Beta Factory, so it makes sense that ‘Biblical Masculinity’ is all about adopting these traits and then attempting to survive the drought without the twin sins of skin pics and choking the pigeon.

This presents a crisis for both Christian men and Christian women: (1) stay with the clown show at your local church, remain alone, spank the monkey when it acts out of control, and comfort your broken ego by telling yourself that you’re following God; or else (2) leave the clown show at your local church and go out into the secular clown world to find a masculine man or a feminine woman who befits God’s natural order and is not like the other clowns.

I highly suspect that God is using this conundrum to separate the wheat from the chaff and oust those given over to the flesh.  Insert dozens of OT references where singleness and barrenness are judgments on society, given by God to rebellious people.

We might suspect that the biggest problem single Christian women are now facing is how to sift through the riff raff and identify the men who talk like Christians and those who act like Christians.  But the real problem they’re facing is how to justify choosing Worldly Men over church boys and how to elicit Christian sympathy when they run into the problems associated with following the Worldly Life Script (e.g. sexual promiscuity, getting knocked up or else deleting babies, getting dumped and heartbroken, wasting their prime SMV years, etc.).  Lately, dealing with any of these ramifications has become a walk in the park for them.

img-1783680484-6a50cde4173b63.20232504.jpg

OTOH, the biggest problem single Christian men are now facing is how to make sense of their current singleness while holding the notion that a Christian woman will/should be attracted to ‘Biblical Masculinity’, however one might erroneously think of that, when it is quite apparent that women are strongly attracted to “Worldly Masculinity’, and NOT church boys.

But wait a minute!

There is one line of argument that says Worldly Wimmin are naturally attracted to Worldly Masculinity, and godly, mature women are more interested in godly men.  And if a worldly woman rejects a godly man because he is godly, then it is to his benefit.  The trash takes itself out.

But what is a man to do when godly mature women are practically nonexistent, and those who claim to be godly and mature suddenly become not so godly and mature when Harley McBadboy strolls by?

Another line of reasoning argues that nature itself teaches us that most all attraction is necessarily of the flesh and there is no distinction between ‘Worldly Masculinity’ and so called ‘Christian Masculinity’, with respect to attraction.  Therefore, in many ways, ‘Biblical Masculinity’ and ‘Worldly Masculinity’ are the same, but what makes it Christian or not is what a man does with himself.  Here we begin to delineate significant differences in behaviors.  Most notably, secular masculinity suggests that a man’s value is primarily indicated by the women he can juice up, neatly quantified by how many, how often, and the SMV quality thereof; whereas Biblical masculinity and MGTOW are pretty much in agreement that men are what they make of themselves.  The difference is that Biblical masculinity entails that women come along for the ride whereas MGTOW leaves women out.

img-1783681112-6a50d058428598.99723085.jpg

The implications of these views are that secular men need to be shagging away early and often with any and every piece he can come down with; whereas MGTOWs and single Christian men should be improving themselves, building a domain, and leading their own life.

Philosophical / political specific views like Christian Nationalism, civilizationism, nihilism, and others fall somewhere in between and have varying nuances, like building / preserving the tribe, effective procreation, “The future belongs to those who show up”, and others.

But once we start down this path, then the same area of confusion still arises — we expect worldly women should be attracted to ‘Worldly Masculinity’, and Christian women should be attracted to ‘Biblical Masculinity’ / ‘godliness’.

And presto!

Now we are back to discussing how Masculine behaviors and traits are viewed and judged by women in an Evo Psych context, as if we are morally bound not to disappoint our betters.

When we start assigning social or sexual value to a man on this basis, it suggests that male seed is more valuable than other masculine qualities, like confidence, diligence, dominance, provision, purpose, etc.  Or to be more precise, the LAMPS rich, Top SMV, Alpha Male seed — the kind that exudes buck confidence pheromones that autosomatically overwhelms women’s moral agency in favor of her breeding instincts with just one whiff from 3 kilometers away on a rainy day, and can thereby induce women to breed like livestock and commit any and all forms of debased immorality in order to defile / sanctify herself unto the meat scepter of his lordship.

img-1783681113-6a50d0597d6ed2.40058104.jpg

Ahh…  Certainly, THIS is what ‘Biblical Masculinity’ is truly all about!  The church and women have conspired to engage in a mass conspiracy to hide from men this vital knowledge of their own immense value down under!  The family jewels!

But wait a minute!

This contradicts the notion that “eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap.”

Moreover, defining manhood based on what women find attractive is a circular argument that devolves into analysis paralysis, and terminates in a genetic dead end.  (This is the problem of induction.)

How long will we delude ourselves into thinking that there is a distinct difference between ‘Biblical Masculinity’ and ‘Worldly Masculinity’?

When are we going to face the fact that what commonly passes for ‘Biblical Masculinity’ is a social construct of chivalrous converged Churchistanity, which is a whitewashed vehicle of the Feminine Imperative, and is in fact, not masculinity at all?

How hard will it be for Christian men to bite their knuckles and admit that ‘Worldly Masculinity’ is much closer to God’s original design than ‘Biblical Masculinity’ — more than their piddly spiritual pride can muster?

The only point of ‘Biblical Masculinity’ that is truly biblical is a man pumping his pea shooter into his own heifer and keeping his d!ck out of crazy.  So why must we build a whole paradigm of masculinity around this one point of wisdom?  Instead, we should add this wisdom to the correct paradigm of masculinity.

Your gut will tell you which one is correct.

Related