A Snapshot of some abortion related issues and other interesting observations and conjectures.

Readership: All;
Theme: Abortion
Length: 1,900 words
Reading Time: 10 minutes

Faustian Slip Reveals All

Repealing Roe v. Wade lifted a veil for all to see the proponents’ true colors.

Sometimes, idolaters can be quite frank, although it may not be their express intentions to do so.

In this video clip, one female protester gets honest in her efforts to derail the speaker’s diatribe on sin and hәll.

She shouts, “I want c0ck!  I want sex!  I want to come!  I want to orgasm!”

At its root, the maxim, “Girls just wanna have fun”, reveals women’s true motivation for demanding abortion and supporting Roe v. Wade.  “Fun” is a euphemism for constant, continual, convenient, free-for-all carousel riding with absolutely no responsibilities nor shame whatsoever.

In another video clip of the same Dobbs protest at Washington D.C. on June 24, here we see Faustians proclaim their true master.

Note that the female speaker is giving them a fire and brimstone call to repentance, warning them against “going to hәll”, but what she fails to grasp is that her audience is already living in hәll and enjoying it.  They shouldn’t have arranged a female to deliver that kind of sermon to this crowd, but it does match the unclean context in a Jonathan Edwardsian way — churchian hoes lecturing secular hoes about digging their graves. It’s disgusting and hilarious at the same time.

Another interesting thing about these clips is the wide array of personality types.  Among the men, there’s an atheist (chanting), several male feminists of various sorts (some chads, some clueless betas, some neckbeards, and some smug chubbies), two Mormons, and a few Tyrones.  Among the women, there’s a couple püssy hatters (one chanting), a hefty termagant in a loud yellow t-shirt, a party girl, a sorority girl, a sweet coquette wearing a green bandanna (exclaiming “Hail Satan!”), and a very traditional looking woman in a black and white sundress.

H/T: Patriactionary: Demoniacs (2022-6-24)

The Fun must Necessarily be Expediently Convenient

“It’s not just that they murder their own babies.  It’s that they do it because convenience.”

Gunner Q2: A deep dive into the socialist hive (2022-6-24)

Yes, overturning Roe v. Wade eviscerates the god of materialistic convenience from the equation.  This, I believe, is the biggest sting of all to its proponents.  No more cuffing on the fly without a care in the world.  No more cheap, easy, quick, secret abortions that no one will ever know about.  Now an Artemisian must take time off work, travel to Storyville, and pay $$$ as an out-of-stater who didn’t pay into the local tax coffer.  And as the number of states that ban abortion increase, wimmin in some areas of the country (i.e. the deep South) will need to travel a very long distance indeed to appear for their date with the grim reaper, and they will feel quite embarrassingly out of place in Clowntown.

OTOH, if a woman doesn’t go to the extra trouble that is now necessary to terminate a pregnancy, she’ll find that that her life instantly becomes much less fun and convenient.  She’ll be forced to grow up and assume responsibility for herself and a child.  She’ll also find it more difficult to pursue a degree, hold down a “career”, and the clincher – No Mo Hoeing!

Your body your choice!

How did Roe v. Wade change the population?

Under Oscar’s post, No Mo Roe (2022-6-27), LastMod wrote,

“So I couldn’t care less if abortion is legal or not because it doesn’t make much difference.  Legislation didn’t stop abortion from happening pre 1973.  Abortion didn’t suddenly take off and become more popular after the pro-abortion marches in 1994.”

Let’s take a look at some data and then decide whether it made any difference or not.

img-1783683858-6a50db122c1539.77311022.png

Let’s put this data into perspective.  I’ve collected some data from several sources (listed at the post’s end) and put together a graph that will make your stomach churn — The Percent of Pregnancies Aborted.

img-1783683859-6a50db136bfe59.75242159.jpg

As can be seen in the graph, as soon as abortion was legalized in 1973, and the numbers started to be recorded, 18.13% of pregnancies ended in abortion.  Within 7 years, this quickly ramped up to an all-time high of 31.12% by 1980.  The rate hovered around 30% all throughout the 80s.  1990 concluded the debauchery of the eighties with an all-time high of 1,608,600 abortions that year — a grand finale of 29.06% of pregnancies.  1992 had an all-time high number of pregnancies, 5,510,229, with 27.75% going in the trashcan.

Moreover, for 12 years (1978-1990), nearly 1 out of every 3 babies were scuttled!  When I first saw this data, it made me nauseous, which is probably why Guttmacher et al. will never depict the data this way.

Births and abortions didn’t begin to decrease until 1993-94.  Ironically, 1993-94 was the same time that the pro-abortion marches swept the nation.  After this, the abortion rate began a steady decline, reaching an all-time low (since 1973) of 18% (862,320) in 2017.  Since then, it has started increasing again.

In conclusion, LastMod’s statement is dead wrong.  Passing Roe v. Wade was a strong incentive for women to use abortion as a form of birth control.  And as I will describe next, it also cleaned out the gene pool.

I have a pet theory about why the number of abortions dropped off precipitously in 1993-94.  Around this time, the generation born after Roe v. Wade (the latter two-thirds of Gen X) was coming of age – a generation that was missing many of its cohorts due to the easy accessibility of abortion.  Those cohorts who were missing were the terminated offspring of mothers who aborted them.  The theory is that the decrease in abortions after 1993-94 is because those Boomer women who were willing to abort their babies didn’t produce Gen X offspring who were similar to their ancestors in this respect.  Over a generation (or two), this thinned out the number of women who were willing to abort their babies and grandbabies.  In effect, women having an abortion-prone nature have self-selectedly removed their genes from the gene pool over the last 49 years, but especially during the first 20 years, as the last 29 years was from a population descended from stock that had already been picked through.

In scientific terminology, what I have described is a natural (or artificial?) selection resulting in a genetic drift. The bottleneck event is selectively removing ~30% of the birth population every year for 12 years and more than ~20% for another 37 years.

img-1783681218-6a50d0c22dc2b5.68693879.jpgThe bottleneck effect is an extreme example of genetic drift that happens when the size of a population is severely reduced.

How will the repeal of Roe v. Wade change the SMP/MMP?

The new ruling introduces a catastrophic fracture in the Feminist Life Script and mixes up women’s choices of preferred mating strategies.

The new ruling puts more pressure on women to reassess their life choices concerning extramarital sex possibly resulting in a pregnancy.  It leaves them five options.

  1. Get married.
  2. Embrace celibacy.
  3. Have children out of wedlock.
  4. Move to states where abortion is legal.*
  5. Procure abortions in a state where abortion is legal.*

* Additions from Thedeti.

According to the Feminine Dilemma, women must work out a very complicated decision of whether to join with a man in a long term relationship, or else pursue an independent lifestyle.  This new ruling forces a sharp urgency for women to make this decision early in life.  It also imposes a strong pressure on women to abandon the Alpha Fux Beta Bux strategy and to get married.

Oh noes!  No Mo Roe, No Mo Hoe!

How will the repeal of Roe v. Wade change the population in the future?

The future depends largely on what percentage of women can get their act together and secure a man for marriage, and quickly.

  • If this percentage is high, then we can expect early marriages to become more common and the birth rate to go up.
  • If this percentage is low, we can expect more out of wedlock births.

On the latter possibility, there are already a large number of out of wedlock births. This number has hovered around 40% since 2007, and will serve as a baseline for future analysis. Of these, there is a number of lower income single mothers intentionally having 2 or more children out of wedlock in order to game the court and/or the welfare system.  This demographic serves as a buffer against any drastic changes in the Feminine Dilemma ratios.  It will be interesting to see how the number of women doing this might change under the new ruling.  We might speculate that the number of women playing this game will increase by default, since abortion is no longer easily accessible.  Again, this depends on what percentage of women can get their honeycraft game on and lock down a man in marriage.  If a sizeable number of women can’t land a man, then we can expect the dolearchy to grow in size and power, possibly until socialism has been attained.

In conclusion, I will speculate that the biggest effect Repealing Roe v. Wade will have on the future population is a sharp increase in the number of minority and working class births (i.e. Blacks).  These groups are less likely to use contraception and are less likely to travel out of state to procure an abortion, due to the costs and the time off work it would require.

Only time will tell.

img-1783683860-6a50db14baa116.35743719.pngSome populations will recover, while others will not.

The Introduction and the Repeal of Roe v. Wade both happened on a Jubilee?

This is incredible!  It just so happens that 2021-9-7 to 2022-9-26 (year 5782 on the Jewish calendar) is a Sabbatical year. The previous Sabbatical year was in 1972-73, and we know what happened on 1973-1-22.

The Jubilee (Hebrew: יובל yōḇel; Yiddish: yoyvl) is the year at the end of seven cycles of shmita (Sabbatical years) and, according to biblical regulations, had a special impact on the ownership and management of land in the Land of Israel.  According to Leviticus 25, Hebrew slaves and prisoners would be freed, debts would be forgiven, and the mercies of God would be particularly manifest.

I’m not at all familiar with the Jewish calendar, and I found some sources that put the years of Jubilee along 1960-2009, so I could be wrong about this.  But if this is true, it seems like more than a coincidence.  Knowledgeable readers are welcome to either confirm or correct this information.

Sources

  1. MacroTrends: United States Birth Rate
  2. MacroTrends: United States Population
  3. United Nations: Fertility Data
  4. Christian Life Resources: U.S. Abortion Statistics by year: 1973-current (2021-1-19)
  5. The Guttmacher Institute: Long-Term Decline in US Abortions Reverses, Showing Rising Need for Abortion as Supreme Court Is Poised to Overturn Roe v. Wade (2022-6-15)
  6. Pew Research: What the data says about abortion in the U.S. (2022-6-24)

Related