How young women are seduced into accepting promiscuity as the norm.

Readership: All
Theme: The W!tchy War on Masculinity
Length: 1,300 words
Reading Time: 7 minutes

Introduction

Red Pill Apostle’s post, The Cultural Myth of the SIW (2023/11/8) covered the faux glorification of masculine women in movies.  The darker side of this trope which he didn’t go into is how modern women aspire to be sexual conquistadors.  Once in a while, we’ll hear some women openly declare that women want “to have sex like men” (sic), even though they’re obviously lacking the hardwood.  What they mean is that they desire to channel their inner slore such to be as freely promiscuous as top SMV HSM playboys, and only with top SMV men as if they were a dime a dozen.*

Gee… Where do they get this idea?

img-1783681977-6a50d3b9b57531.68551720.jpgAdvertisement for Burberry depicting the poly rotating metrosexual lifestyle lauded for its “fashion appeal”.

The sexual objectification of wimmin is roundly condemned by feministas — except when women choose to objectify themselves for the sake of attention and SMP status, and in this special circumstance, female sexual objectification is glorified!  Thus, we see S1ut Faming everywhere on the media, being covertly passed off as “fashion”, “lifestyle”, “popularity”, and “self-fulfillment”.

S1ut Faming and the glorification of sexual liberation are ubiquitous in advertisements, movies, television, and online literature.  RPA already covered women in films.  Here, I’ll go over famous female personas and women’s literature.

* The fact is that there aren’t enough HSM to go around, so they end up sharing them in rotating soft polyharems.

Case Study — K!m Kard@sh!an

The wealthiest wh0re of the West, K!m Kard@sh!an, is the most ostentatious epitome of this archetype.

Time magazine included K@rd@sh!an on their list of 2015’s 100 most influential people, while Vogue described her in 2016 as a “pop culture phenomenon”. Critics and admirers have described her as exemplifying the notion of being “famous for being famous” (Translation: “famous for being a female sex symbol”), and she has used her fame to exemplify the star feminist, which the media has amply designated for prime exposure to push s1ut faming to the full.

Forbes reported that “she has monetized fame better than any other”, through fashion ventures and television production. She was reported to be the highest-paid reality television personality of 2015, with her total earnings exceeding US$53 million. Taking after her sister, Kylie Jenner was the top earning female last year.

Remember, the definition of a wh0re is a woman who monetizes her sexuality.

img-1783681979-6a50d3bb2fe7a6.26348013.jpg

Hailing from a family spoiled by fame, wealth, and affluence, it would seem that finding ‘self-fulfillment’ would be a walk down Figueroa St. for her — a far cry from the real challenges involved with true character building.

Instead, she has engaged in multiple marriages rife with affairs, contrived to generate money through the sensationalistic media attention of subsequent divorces.  She has also used her ample a$$ets to bring her expertise in the p0rn industry into every family’s home on prime time television. Then she emphasized this point by appearing in Playboy magazine, which ‘normalized’ her lewd lifestyle in the minds of many Americans.

Meanwhile, middle America has come to accept KK as a common household name, while millions of young women are frequenting the local gym, doing squats and deadlifts until they can achieve the steatopygic bubble butt that has swept Hollywood by storm. When these women hit 50, those huge droopy glutes will surely eye bleach the younger generations.

Case Study — Women’s Literature

Women’s media producers, like Allure, Babe, Bazaar, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Essence, Glamour, InStyle, RedBook, Self, Vanity Fair, Vogue, W, and others all contain a Gnostic appeal to female fantasy, solipsism, and the Feminine Imperative, and press the concept of female primacy — all politely presented as “lifestyle”. Role models similar in essence to the Kard@sh!ans are amply showcased (e.g. Jessica Alba, Cameron Diaz, Eva Mendez, Aubrey Plaza, Brittney Spears, et al.).

img-1783681980-6a50d3bcddca93.98020990.jpgVogue Australia, March 2020 edition.
  • These sites specifically employ a level of psychological sophistication in their marketing to target horny, naïve teenage girls and present bimbofication as the norm.
  • Personal pronouns (“Attract the man of your dreams.”) and open ended promises are ubiquitously employed (“You can have better orgasms.”), which leave the subject open to the reader’s imaginative interpretation.  For example, InStyle often quips, “where the reader is the celebrity”. 
  • Trendy vernacular is masterfully presented to appeal to adolescent girls who are ripe for the psychological plundering, which is no mere coincidence.  For example, colloquial buzz terms like “Whatever…”, and “Ask me later”, are often used, which I might add are dead giveaways for liars.
  • These sites actively promote erotic literature [example] and p0rn [example].
  • Magazines and online sites that cater to women’s competitive sexuality outnumber all other genres.
  • Female authors outnumber males, thus contributing to the hegemony.
img-1783681982-6a50d3be76da27.67397221.jpgCosmopolitan, August 2010 edition.

Some soul shackling examples from the website, Babe, are as follows.

Of particular note, Chateau Heartiste offered a commentary on Caroline Finney’s article, entitled, The Fake Bravado of the Gross Skank (2018/3/4).

Lies upon lies!  Leading to lays upon lays! Resulting in slores upon slores!

The most shocking thing about this is that these slores become a starring role model for failure when they offer apparent ‘confirmations’ of those lies through their own ‘lifestyles’, and write ‘fashionable’, trendy articles about it, and yet they still continue to be admired as famous social role models.

Why?

These lies become attractive and convincing when these ‘confirmations’ are offered as ‘proof’ that Satan truly follows through on his promises, and rewards his feminions with unmitigated sexual indiscretions and handsome stud butler services.

img-1783681984-6a50d3c00a6f77.57206381.jpg

Conclusions

The nude backbone of s1ut faming is the semiotic illusion of female sexual power and the accompanying sexual authority, as RPA described.  Granted, this is one of the few forms of authentic power that women have over men, but the willingness to wield this power openly and publicly has now lost all sense of opprobrium.

The basic recipe for $1ut Faming consists of a contrived ‘success story’, offering affirmation, narratives of justification, role models to be admired and emulated, and sometimes even mentorship.  All this is peddled as a package deal, ‘lifestyle’.

The qualifications for ‘success’ always require the traditional Christian moral value system to be flipped on its head, with women professing pride in their high notch counts, and making promiscuity appear ‘normal’, widespread, and socially acceptable. This is one of those things where it’s only true if you believe it, and TPTB have used the media for decades to get a critical mass of the public to believe it.

img-1783681986-6a50d3c251f733.65097556.pngAdvertisement for Hermes depicting obscene feminine arousal.

The way S1ut Faming fits into the W!tchy War on Masculinity is that it casts a spell of fleshly materialism and sex-centrism over the minds of young women, seduces them into promiscuity, spoils them for marriage, and transforms them into enemies of God’s ordained order.  (See links below for more detail.)  Men are left with fewer and lower quality women as companions and they have to deal with all the aftermath of their corruption.  To state that this is greatly discouraging and disheartening to men is an understatement.

It could fairly be said that K!m Kard@sh!an and Cosmopolitan magazine indirectly created MGTOW.

Related