The most effective eugәn!cs program of the modern age.

Readership: All
Theme: Cultural Demise
Length: 1,100 words
Reading Time: 6 minutes

Roe vs. Wade was a Bottleneck Event

In No Mo Roe, No Mo Hoe! (2022/6/29), I described the Roe vs. Wade period of U.S. history as a genetic bottleneck event that selectively removed ~30% of the birth population every year for 12 years and more than ~20% for another 37 years.

img-1783681218-6a50d0c22dc2b5.68693879.jpg

As mind=blowing as this was, I was not content with this analysis. I decided to look into the data further to see exactly how much of a bottleneck it was.

Initially, I had expected that poor and highly promiscuous women were the most likely to kill off their progeny.  It turns out, I wasn’t too far off the mark. But there’s a lot more.

After looking at 40 years of data, Dehlendorf et al. [1] reported that the open season on baby parts hit lower income blacks the hardest.

According to KFF [2], in 2020, the percentages of abortions by race are listed as follows.

RacePercent of the PopulationNumber of AbortionsPercent of Abortions
Black13.6%130,53839%
White58.9%108,90433%
Hispanic19.1%70,42021%
Other8.4%23,4277%

When comparing the percent of the U.S. population to the percent of abortions by r@c!al categories, Blacks had the highest per capita rate of abortion, while Wh!tes had the lowest.  Abortions among Hispanics and Others were proportional to their populations.

img-1783682618-6a50d63a8592e9.55807967.gifImage Source: The Guttmacher Institute [3].

And this is just one year (2020).

In 2004, it looked like this. → → →

The numbers are pretty similar.

If every year since 1973 had similar rates by race, this would appear to be a massive Black cull.

Where is the W0ke outrage over this?

Apparently, women’s “right” to “choice” is more important than Blacks’ right to life.

img-1783682620-6a50d63c3b2955.05702909.jpgBlack population of U.S. counties in 1900 and 2020. [Image Source: Maps Porn]

Legalized and Subsidized Abortion as a defacto Eugәn!cs Program

History will show Roe vs. Wade as the most diabolical form of eugәn!c r@c!al discrimination in modern times — enforced not by edict nor force of law, but by an unrestricted appeal to the base insecurities of the feminine nature. Restrictions were removed by making it legal, subsidizing it, and relegating the decision to be made privately by individual women while they’re in a dependent and helpless state.

Apparently, this was no accident.  Abortion firebrands of the 1960s and 70s actually had this motivation.

“Marcus Epstein raises an interesting question when he asks if harping on Sanger’s r@c!sm does harm in other areas.  Does it feed into what we might call the Left’s “Anti-Southern Strategy,” which entails hunting down and denouncing every trace even of group identification among European Americans, while coddling and profiting from outright r@c!sm and bigotry among every other ethnicity?

Well, maybe.  But that’s not the real problem with tarring today’s Planned Parenthood with its founder’s ethnic obsessions.  Instead, it is this: Attacking an organization that kills tens of thousands of children every year because it might, just might, be a little r@c!st is simply a joke.  And in very poor taste, like denouncing H!tler for destroying German typography.

As I’ve written elsewhere, compared to legal abortion, the whole of J!m Cr0w was a fart in a bathtub.  Even sl@very paled.  We need to make this point over and over again and not to undermine it by our own tactics.”

Taki’s Magazine: Sometimes a R@c!st, Always a S1ut (2008/5/6)

H/T: Cameron232

img-1783682621-6a50d63d8fdb95.86978086.jpgImage Source: Epstein, 2003 [4]

Conclusions

Throughout most of history, excess populations have been curtailed by disease, famine, and war.  Now that disease and famine are decreasing, and economic prosperity and life expectancy are increasing, we now enjoy living conditions that would normally promote a massive population boom.

So now the PTB must cook up another plan to keep populations in check.

Since the 20th century, various regimes around the world have employed various defacto eugәn!cs and population control programs.

  • Mass destruction of European men during WW1 and WW2.
  • During the latter half of the 20th century, China culled their population through a cultural revolution followed by the One Child policy and ended up with a glut of men.
  • In 1973, the U.S. adopted the practice of culling their population through legalizing abortion.
  • Since the turn of the 21st century, India has been embracing the Feminist Life Script and the higher education / Career Life Script for females as a time tested and trustworthy method to reduce marriage and proliferation.

All these changes have set up a world ripe for mass warfare, where sin and death are the only paths to peace.  (Angry, disillusioned, and displaced men are only pacified by hormone blockers / testosterone reduction, recreational drugs, p0rn, sex, war, or death. Take your pick as to which one of these is coming next.)

img-1783682622-6a50d63ed65ca5.29920307.jpg

Questions

If we are to assume a grand consp!r@cy as the information above suggests, then the question that arises is, “If this eugәn!cs program worked so well, then why is it now being stopped by repealing Roe vs. Wade?”

IOW, what happens when we get rid of the bottle neck of abortion? 

Now that the first few rounds of experimentation have proved successful, it’s possible that the PTB realized that by allowing states to prohibit abortion, they could achieve certain other goals, such as…

  • Decrease the percentage of Wh!te Deplorables in society.
  • Increase the percentage of minorities in society.
  • Eradicate the Wh!te majority. (We’re almost there now.)
  • Increase the crime rate. (It’s true. See [5].)
  • Bankrupt the social security, medical care, prison, and welfare systems.
  • Create a Malthusian Crunch.

The realistic honest answer is that there will be a lower class population boom, and a sh!t ton of people will be added to the welfare rolls and end up in the prison system.

And this is only the beginning. 

Sources

  1. Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. “Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach,” American Journal of Public Health 103(10):1772-9 (2013).  DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301339.  Epub 2013 Aug 15. PMID: 23948010; PMCID: PMC3780732.  [Read Online]  [PDF]
  2. KFF: Reported Legal Abortions by Race of Women Who Obtained Abortion by the State of Occurrence (2020)
  3. Guttmacher Institute: Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture (2008/8/6)
  4. Epstein, C. “Is modern genetics the new eugenics?” Genetic Medicine 5, 469–475 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000093978.77435.17
  5. John J Donohue , Steven Levitt, The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime over the Last Two Decades, American Law and Economics Review, 22(2):241–302 (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaa008

Related