Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]Wisemanner 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mikesteane 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]falselyaccusedguy234 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]MagicTampon points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Effectively, there already is amnesty because false accusers are virtually never prosecuted anyhow.
But seriously, in my opinion, in case someone confesses to a false accusation and in so doing, sets someone free from prosecution or from prison, if the accuser would otherwise not have been discovered as a false accuser, they probably should not be prosecuted.
Because the first priority should always be to rescue the victim -- the falsely accused.
But if the false accuser is separately discovered as having lied, or only confesses only as they are about to be exposed, then that false accuser should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
This includes prosecution for false testimony and false reporting, but also includes prosecution as principles in the crimes of false imprisonment, physical battery and related violent crimes, in case the accused is detained or imprisoned. So for example under US Federal law:
[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]andejoh 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link