Roughly 33% of students are male and 67% are female. Feminists don’t seem to think this is a problem. Here's why this sort of trend pushed by feminists will destroy them:

Women all want to marry up and across economic and dominance hierarchies (Hypergamy).

Do the math: University Enrollment is now 67% female and 33% male, which means for every 1,000 students there are 330 men and 670 women.

This new feminist utopia we now live in means a shortage of 340 men for women at university....670-330 = 340 men.

Feminists don't see this gender enrollment gap as a problem for men or women because they don't think logically. Feminists are callous, bitter, and gynocentric. This social blindness created by women ironically ends up creating problems for women.

This female dominance at university is a relatively new thing and the devastation it will cause for feminism is blatantly obvious and will only accelerate.

The numbers above assume the men at university only date women at university, however, this is highly unlikely. While women only marry across and up dominance hierarchies, men on the other hand marry across and down dominance hierarchies. What does this mean? It means that the girl taking the gender studies, sociology or economics degree at university is competing with all the other women in society for those economically dominant university men. That cute girl cutting hair with a hot body, that smoke show working the register at Target, etc. can easily out-compete an average looking woman at university when it comes to finding an Alpha Male who also goes to university. Money makes men more attractive but it doesn't do the same thing for women. Feminists either don’t realize this or will not admit it.

The above situation creates an even larger discrepancy than the 340 outlined above when you factor in non university women competing for those same university men (men on average who go to university make more than non university men so I am eliminating the men who don’t go to college — I know there are exceptions to this and it is rapidly changing).

When women spend their healthiest years competing with other women and men for money, they are doing so against borrowed time as well as too much competition (The Wall is undefeated). Take a guess who they will blame... yep, MEN.

We have never in history tried this social experiment of delayed pair bonding, uninhibited sexuality, and female economic dominance and so far it has been a complete disaster. Young pair bonding, restrained sexuality, female economic dependence and inter-dependence with males was selected by evolution because it WORKS.

Any society that adopts feminism will quickly disappear from history based on demographics alone (western birth rates are plummeting rapidly and many below replacement levels) without even getting into the socioeconomic destruction it brings with it.

To keep society moving along under radical modern feminism they will need to implement control of non-breeding men (already happening) for the safety of the feminist elites....male and female.

Marriage is now a quaint relic reserved for the top income performers. For most people in advanced countries like Sweden, Japan, and America, marriage has already ceased being a functional reality or organizing principle of their lives. Women spend most of their lives essentially old (90 percent of their eggs are gone by 30) by nature's standards of desirability and this time bomb combined with radical feminism will only lead to disaster.

TL;DR — feminism leads to destruction of society, be long in cat food producing companies.