Before we begin, let me show you a statistical way to analyze a person. Its called a IQ test and in general is a good predictor on your capabilities and processing speed. There are two major ones, Mathematical IQ and Verbal IQ. These determine your constant appearance as what happens internally in you but more importantly externally.

Lets showcase four examples of these variations:

Super High Verbal, Super Low Maths: Schizophrenic, someone who is detached from collective language.

Super High Maths, Super Low Verbal: Autistic, clinical dependency with the real.

Higher Maths Than Verbal: Systematizing

Higher Verbal Than Maths: Justifications

Assuming we have a normal person with normal balances then someone who can think mathematically is more inclined towards jobs such as programming or logistics. Their sentences and topics are very consistent and clean. Sometimes bourgeois people virtue signal by inorganically mimicking this trend on social media. Someone with higher verbal tends to want jobs such as sales or whatever requires expression.

The efficiency is determined by potential IQ. In general women are low on both and the smart ones are always higher verbal. Men and betas as a rule are higher maths. Ideally they would compliment each other. "Before you would have the church (verbal IQ) that would justify men's passions, now with the dissolution of the church the burden is set on the individual". Hence why we navigate towards chaos and degeneracy as a whole in society.

Lets break into subcategories now. Trivium is the end point of all speech. It is summarized with: 1. Reference points, 2. Grammar, 3. Logic, 4. Rhetoric. Usually there is a strong combination of two with a unimportant theme of others.

Neutral Academic = 1 and 2

Liberal Normie = 2 and 3

Convinced Ideologue = 4 and 3

Teacher Archetype = 1 and 4

There's a split between mathematical and verbal IQ. 1.Reference points and 2.Grammar are on the side of mathematical while 3. Logic, 4. Rhetoric are on the side of verbal. If we were to break down these elements alone they would be something like this.

Fundamental: Reference Points (Ideology)

Carrying Mechanism: Grammar

Highlighting Negative and Positive Outcomes: Logic

Persuasion, finding the right mechanisms that trigger you towards a flow: Rhetoric

When the sum of a cultures individuals are put together then we have a general message forwarded. This can take the form of analytical vs continental philosophy for example. English culture is a symptom of Reference points and Grammar. Their expression is very strong however lack style and meaning. Continentals are the opposite but sometimes "uninterpretable" to the reader. Novices usually have strong ideological biases and dogmatic styles that analytics hide. This hiding is done by approaching language from many directions. You could find 4-6 ways to express a given topic if you wanted to. However this dependency is based on your characteristics.

Ther are many such cases where this theory could be used. Authentic male experience vs Maternal Status Quo aka Red Pill vs Blue Pill and so on.